Arjuna asks for the sage made visible: how does steadiness speak, sit, and walk?
Krishna has just named a wisdom that no longer wavers. Arjuna's next move is not to ask what it means, but what it looks like, in a real body, in an ordinary day.
Arjuna asked: Keshava, how would you describe someone whose understanding has become steady and who rests in that deep absorption? How does such a person speak, sit, and move through the world?
The reading read whole, as one unhurried piece
Where it stands
Krishna has just told Arjuna that when the intellect crosses the swamp of scriptural confusion and delusion, yoga is reached. Arjuna, hearing this, does not ask for more doctrine. He asks to see the person such a teaching produces: what would steady wisdom look like, walking around in an ordinary body, on an ordinary day.
The teaching
Notice what Arjuna does not ask. He does not ask for a definition he could recite. He asks for a description he could recognize: how does such a person talk, how does he sit, how does he move. This is a shift from doctrine to evidence. An inward state that leaves no outward trace is not yet something anyone, including the one who has it, can trust. So the eighteen verses that follow this question are not a digression from the teaching on knowledge and action; they are its proof, offered in the coin of visible behavior. And the answer works two ways at once. It describes the sage who has already arrived, and in the very same words it hands the seeker, whoever reads this now, a practice: what the settled person shows without effort, you can take up deliberately, and walk toward becoming.
The doubt that rises
Is Arjuna asking about a single figure, one sage seen in two conditions, absorbed and active? Or does the question conceal several distinct types, the knower of Brahman, the devotee lost in love, the yogi who has simply mastered breath and posture? And what, underneath all of it, does steady wisdom actually consist of?
Where the paths divide
Read as one figure, the knower of non-dual truth.
The steadiness you ask after is the firm, direct knowledge that the self is the supreme Brahman, no longer a belief held at arm's length but the very ground of experience. One figure stands before you, the knower of truth abiding in samadhi, not a separate kind of yogi defined by breath-control or fixed posture. And notice what this means for you: the very marks of the one who has arrived are given to you as the means of arriving. What he shows without effort, you take up as practice.
Read as a plain question about form and conduct.
You are asking, quite simply, what term names the man established in steady wisdom and what his conduct shows. No hidden formula of oneness with the absolute is required to make sense of the question. To describe how someone speaks, sits, and moves is already to describe what he has become, since for a self who lives in loving relation to the Lord, conduct is not separate from character.
Read as an informed question, not a naive one.
You already half-know the mark Krishna gave you; you restate it here to show your grasp before asking for the further sign that will hold in every case, in every person, without exception. This is how the wise have always asked, even the ancient sages who already knew, because a question spoken aloud draws out what silence keeps hidden, and the one who governs even the highest gods, addressed here as Keshava, is the fitting one to answer it.
Read as recognition, not observation.
The truest sign is not something you could watch from the outside. It is the moment recognition dawns, and the whole of scripture, everything heard and everything still longed for, is taken in without residue or resistance. Your own question, in fact, rises out of a deeper confusion: your grief over the coming battle is itself a false seeing, and to ask after the settled one is, underneath, to ask after your own way out of it.
Read as devotion wanting a visible form.
You ask because love wants to see, not only to be told. Speech, posture, and gait become three windows onto one heart that has stopped clutching at its own gain and loss. This is not idle curiosity about behavior; it is the natural wish of a devoted heart to meet its ideal in a form it could actually recognize if it passed by.
Read as four distinct, carefully separated questions.
Look closely and your one question divides into four: how is the absorbed sage described, and, once he has risen from that absorption, how does he speak under praise and blame, how does he sit, how does he move and reach for things in the world. The absorbed state and the active state are not the same condition, and a careful answer has to address both.
All six readings agree that Arjuna is asking for a recognizable, embodied sign, not an abstract definition. They part on what that sign ultimately points to: identity with Brahman, loving service, delegated dependence, inward recognition, devotional intimacy, or a technical division of states. This page will not force those apart into a single answer, and neither does the verse.
A question to carry
If someone watched you speak, sit, and move today with no other information about you, what would they conclude about the state of your mind?
Where this teaching travels
Verses that sit near this one, each going its own way; follow whichever calls you.
So carry this question the way Arjuna carried it: not as a test to pass, but as an honest mirror. Let your own speech, your own stillness, your own movement, tell you the truth about where your mind actually rests.
Each school is voiced from the commentators named above. Their full words, every translation, and where the schools agree and differ wait in the reading desk just below. Open the commentary desk.
This question closes the chapter's opening argument and opens its most famous portrait, the eighteen verses on the sthitaprajna that answer exactly what Arjuna asks here.
Where they agreethe convergence
Across schools and centuries the commentators come to the same ground. These are the points they share, and the voices that hold each one.
Arjuna asks for the marks of steady wisdom, turning an abstract description into a recognizable, embodied figure.
Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Dvaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja · Madhva · Śrīdhara · MadhusūdanaIn Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and 3 others’ words
Every reading agrees on what Arjuna is doing here: he is asking for the marks of the sthitaprajna, the person of steady wisdom, whose understanding Krishna has just described as settled and unwavering. The question turns an abstract description into a request for something recognizable, a person one could actually meet.
The question pairs an inward half with an outward half: how such a person speaks, sits, and moves through the world.
Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja · Śrīdhara · MadhusūdanaIn Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and 2 others’ words
The question has two halves that all six commentators keep together: an inward half, asking what marks or names such a person, and an outward half, asking how he speaks, sits, and moves. Outward conduct is read as the visible evidence of an inward state that cannot be pointed to directly.
The answer that follows works two ways at once, describing who has arrived and instructing who is still on the way.
Across AdvaitaŚaṅkara · MadhusūdanaIn Śaṅkara and Madhusūdana’s words
Several readings converge on a double function for whatever answer follows: it will describe the sage who has already arrived, and in the very same words it will hand the seeker a practice. What the settled person shows without effort becomes, for the one still striving, something to be deliberately cultivated.
Ordinary conduct, tested under praise, blame, and daily pressure, is where a genuine mark of steadiness would have to show itself.
Across Dvaita, Kashmir Śaiva, AdvaitaMadhva · Abhinavagupta · MadhusūdanaIn Madhva, Abhinavagupta, and 1 others’ words
The address Keshava is treated as meaningful rather than incidental. Whether read through etymology or through the logic of who alone can answer so intimate a question, the name is taken to signal that only the Lord who governs the innermost self can disclose what steady wisdom truly looks like from within.
The address Keshava marks the gravity of the question: only the one who governs the innermost self can answer it fully.
Across Dvaita, Bhakti, AdvaitaMadhva · Śrīdhara · MadhusūdanaIn Madhva, Śrīdhara, and 1 others’ words
None of the six readings treats Arjuna's question as confused or premature. Whether framed as an act of devotion wanting to see its object concretely, as a seeker's practical curiosity, or as a restating of a known mark before requesting a further one, the question is read as fitting and well-timed, arising directly from what Krishna has just finished saying.
This is the shared ground; it can be carried as it is. Below is where they differ.
Where they differthe divergence
Viśiṣṭādvaita, in their fuller words
Ramanuja declines to read an identity formula into the question and keeps to its plain sense: what term names the established man, and what does his conduct show. Conduct is not incidental to the answer but its very substance, since telling of a person's particular behavior is already telling what he is.
Dvaita, in their fuller words
Madhva reads Arjuna's restatement of an already-given mark as proof of comprehension rather than confusion, asked so that a further, universally valid mark can now be supplied. The address Keshava names Krishna as ruler over the highest gods, fitting for one about to disclose so deep a secret to a questioner whose asking mirrors that of the ancient sages and seers.
Bhakti, in their fuller words
Sridhara reads the question as devotion's own way of wanting to see its object concretely, in gesture, word, and gait, rather than only as an abstract definition. Speaking, sitting, and moving are three windows onto one settled heart, no longer occupied with its own gain and loss.
A modern reading, in their fuller words
Madhusudana separates the question with technical care into two states of one person, absorbed and active, yielding four distinct questions rather than one blurred one: a mark for the inward condition, and three marks for behavior in the world under praise, blame, and ordinary activity.
A few questions to carry
These ask for understanding, not recall; each answer is settled by the commentary itself.
For a second sitting
Carry this with youwhat stays
Before you read further into the chapter's long answer, sit for a moment with Arjuna's own question turned toward yourself. Not, what do I believe, but, how would someone watching me speak, sit, and move know whether my mind has settled or is still restless. Let the body's evidence be as honest a teacher as any doctrine.
So ask this of yourself as Arjuna asked it of Krishna: not only what do I believe, but how do I speak, how do I sit, how do I move, and let the answer that follows measure you honestly.
Read deeper
Everything a full study holds, folded below.
Word by word
All the commentary, woven together
The commentary, woven together
machine-assisted draft, pending review
Convergence
very reading agrees on what Arjuna is doing here: he is asking for the marks of the sthitaprajna, the person of steady wisdom, whose understanding Krishna has just described as settled and unwavering. The question turns an abstract description into a request for something recognizable, a person one could actually meet.
Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Madhvācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī
The question has two halves that all six commentators keep together: an inward half, asking what marks or names such a person, and an outward half, asking how he speaks, sits, and moves. Outward conduct is read as the visible evidence of an inward state that cannot be pointed to directly.
Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī
Several readings converge on a double function for whatever answer follows: it will describe the sage who has already arrived, and in the very same words it will hand the seeker a practice. What the settled person shows without effort becomes, for the one still striving, something to be deliberately cultivated.
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī
The address Keshava is treated as meaningful rather than incidental. Whether read through etymology or through the logic of who alone can answer so intimate a question, the name is taken to signal that only the Lord who governs the innermost self can disclose what steady wisdom truly looks like from within.
Madhvācārya · Ācārya Abhinavagupta · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī
None of the six readings treats Arjuna's question as confused or premature. Whether framed as an act of devotion wanting to see its object concretely, as a seeker's practical curiosity, or as a restating of a known mark before requesting a further one, the question is read as fitting and well-timed, arising directly from what Krishna has just finished saying.
Madhvācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī
Divergence
Advaita Vedānta
Shankara reads steady wisdom as the firm, direct conviction 'I am the supreme Brahman,' and the question as opening an inquiry into the one already liberated while still embodied. The marks that follow answer for two kinds of seeker, the one on the path of knowledge from the start and the one who proceeds through action, because the signs of the arrived can everywhere be taught as the means of arriving.
Śaṅkarācārya
Viśiṣṭādvaita
Ramanuja declines to read an identity formula into the question and keeps to its plain sense: what term names the established man, and what does his conduct show. Conduct is not incidental to the answer but its very substance, since telling of a person's particular behavior is already telling what he is.
Rāmānujācārya
Dvaita
Madhva reads Arjuna's restatement of an already-given mark as proof of comprehension rather than confusion, asked so that a further, universally valid mark can now be supplied. The address Keshava names Krishna as ruler over the highest gods, fitting for one about to disclose so deep a secret to a questioner whose asking mirrors that of the ancient sages and seers.
Madhvācārya
Kashmir Śaiva
Abhinavagupta turns the question inward, toward recognition rather than external behavior: the sign of gained yoga-intelligence is that the whole of scripture is taken in without residue. He reads Arjuna's very question as arising from the same false seeing, the grief over the family's destruction, that a deeper recognition will eventually dissolve.
Ācārya Abhinavagupta
Bhakti
Sridhara reads the question as devotion's own way of wanting to see its object concretely, in gesture, word, and gait, rather than only as an abstract definition. Speaking, sitting, and moving are three windows onto one settled heart, no longer occupied with its own gain and loss.
Śrīdhara Svāmī
Modern
Madhusudana separates the question with technical care into two states of one person, absorbed and active, yielding four distinct questions rather than one blurred one: a mark for the inward condition, and three marks for behavior in the world under praise, blame, and ordinary activity.
Madhusūdana Sarasvatī
A Seeker Asks
Why does Arjuna ask about something as ordinary as speaking, sitting, and walking, when the real issue is supposed to be knowledge or liberation?
Because an inward state that leaves no outward trace is not yet trustworthy, even to the one who has it. The commentators agree that behavior is where an inner claim gets tested against reality.
Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī
Because the very same marks that describe the sage also function as a practice for you. What looks like a portrait is, in truth, also a set of instructions, since these signs can be cultivated deliberately rather than only recognized after the fact.
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī
And because a mark worth trusting must hold everywhere, not only in rare or exalted moments. Ordinary acts, done under ordinary pressures like praise and blame, are exactly where a genuine steadiness would have to show itself if it is real at all.
Madhvācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī
Contemplation
Before you read further into the chapter's long answer, sit for a moment with Arjuna's own question turned toward yourself. Not, what do I believe, but, how would someone watching me speak, sit, and move know whether my mind has settled or is still restless. Let the body's evidence be as honest a teacher as any doctrine.
Sit with this · sonnet-5-authored
All the translations and commentary
Pull up a chair.
You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, open a tradition in the doorways below, or add a voice by name above.
Also hear this verse, tradition by tradition.