Giving up the fruit of action frees the wise from the bondage of birth.
The fruit born of action will reach you whether or not you hanker for it, as the crop comes up for anyone who sows. What you are asked to give up is only the inner grip on the result: act with a steady, even mind, and let the craving go, not the work.
The wise, acting with discernment, give up the fruits born of action. Freed from the bondage of birth, they reach a state beyond all suffering.
The verses before this left open a precise question: how can action, which normally chains a person to its results, ever become a road to freedom? Here Krishna answers by naming the inner disposition, the even and discerning mind, through which ordinary work stops binding and begins to liberate.
Where they agreethe convergence
Across schools and centuries the commentators come to the same ground. These are the points they share, and the voices that hold each one.
A precise question is being answered: how can work, which usually ties you to its results, ever carry you toward freedom? Joined with the even, discerning mind, the same action that bound you begins to release you.
Across Advaita, Bhakti, Dvaita, ŚuddhādvaitaŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Dhanapati · Śrīdhara · Madhva · Jayatīrtha · Puruṣottama · NīlakaṇṭhaIn Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 7 others’ words
This verse answers a precise question left open by the verses before it: how can action, which normally chains a person to its results, ever become a road to freedom? Krishna's answer is that the key lies in the inner disposition called buddhi-yukta, being joined with the even, balanced intellect (buddhi here means the steady, discerning mind, not mere cleverness). When work is done from that even mind, it stops binding and starts liberating. Several commentators read the verse as Krishna spelling out, step by step, the mechanism by which ordinary action turns into a means of release.
Giving up the fruit is not refusing to act or pretending no result will come; it is acting without craving or sense of ownership, offering the work itself, and that letting-go of the inner grip is within anyone's reach.
Across Advaita, Bhakti, Dvaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Kashmir Śaiva, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Madhusūdana · Śrīdhara · Madhva · Rāmānuja · Ramsukhdas · Sivananda · Baladeva · Abhinavagupta · Jñāneśvar · TilakIn Śaṅkara, Madhusūdana, and 9 others’ words
The pivotal move is 'abandoning the fruit born of action' (phalaṁ tyaktvā). The commentators are careful about what this does and does not mean. It does not mean refusing to act or pretending results will not come; it means acting without craving, desire, or attachment for the result, and offering the action instead to the Lord or doing it purely as worship. One modern voice makes the distinction sharp: as a farmer who sows seed will certainly get a crop whether or not he hankers for it, so the doer of action will certainly meet its fruit; what is given up is not the fruit, which is inevitable, but the desire, longing, sense of ownership, and inner clinging toward it, and giving up that craving is something everyone is capable of.
The fruit being renounced is the gaining of a body, pleasing or unpleasing; to win any such body is to be born again, so in releasing the craving you release the very thing that pulls you back into birth.
Across Advaita, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Dhanapati · RamsukhdasIn Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 3 others’ words
Several commentators identify exactly what 'fruit' is being renounced and why it amounts to bondage: the fruit of action is the obtaining of a body, whether a pleasing, desirable body (such as a divine birth) or an unpleasing, undesirable one (such as an animal birth). To gain any such body is to be born again, and birth itself is the bondage. So renouncing the fruit, rightly understood, is renouncing the whole machinery of rebirth. This is why the very next phrase follows naturally: the wise become 'freed from the bondage of birth' (janma-bandha-vinirmuktāḥ), because the desire that fuels rebirth has been let go.
What you reach is the state free of all affliction and disorder, and this is liberation; the wise who understand taste it clear-eyed, and it can begin even now, while you still live.
Across Advaita, Bhakti, Śuddhādvaita, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Dhanapati · Śrīdhara · Jñāneśvar · Ramsukhdas · Nīlakaṇṭha · Vallabha · Puruṣottama · Baladeva · Tilak · SivanandaIn Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 11 others’ words
The reward is 'padam anāmayam', the state free of disease or affliction (anāmaya means without illness, without any disturbance or disorder), and this state is liberation. The commentators stress that those who reach it are 'manīṣiṇaḥ', the wise, the knowers, those who understand the meaning of scripture; the freedom is not blind but illumined. Many add that this freedom can begin even while one still lives, as liberation-while-living: the wise realize their own true nature here and now, untouched by good and bad action alike, and so escape the turning wheel of birth and death.
So this is not only described to you but pressed upon you: since this even-minded work purifies and carries one to the highest state, take up exactly this kind of action yourself, and walk it.
Across Advaita, Bhakti, Kashmir Śaiva, and the modern voicesMadhusūdana · Baladeva · Abhinavagupta · RamsukhdasIn Madhusūdana, Baladeva, and 2 others’ words
Read in its setting, the verse is also an exhortation, not just a description. Because those who give up craving for fruit and act with the even mind are purified, lose the inner causes of rebirth, and reach the supreme state, the lesson lands on the listener: you too, as a seeker of the highest good, should take up exactly this kind of action. The verse thus closes the immediate teaching on buddhi-yoga by pressing it home as the path to be walked.
This is the shared ground; it can be carried as it is. Below is where they differ.
Where they differthe divergence
Advaita Vedānta, in their fuller words
For these commentators the chain runs through self-knowledge. Acting with the even mind and without desire for fruit purifies the inner being; that purity gives rise to the discernment of the Self disclosed by the great scriptural sentence 'that thou art' (tat tvam asi); and that knowledge, by destroying ignorance and its effects, brings liberation. The liberated state is reached 'non-differently': it is not arrival at a separate place but the realization of one's own self as Brahman, of the nature of bliss, fearless, free of all ill. One commentator works through a careful objection about the word 'buddhi': taken merely as the even intellect, balance of mind cannot by itself wipe out good and bad deeds, so a second, fitting sense is offered, that the buddhi here is the understanding whose object is the unlimited reality, which directly frees one from the bondage of birth. Another raises and answers the worry that giving up even good deeds and their fruit might be a loss of the human goal, replying that what is gained, the supreme human goal of liberation, infinitely outweighs the trivial fruit set aside.
Dvaita, in their fuller words
Here the verse is read as laying out a strict order of means: the fruit of action is given up by offering it without desire to the Lord; yoga (disciplined action) is the means to knowledge; and knowledge is the means to release. So action does not free directly but through knowledge, and knowledge leads to the supreme station. One commentator labors over the grammar and structure to show that this one verse expounds two things at once, the means to knowledge (yoga) and liberation itself, and insists that the single word 'yoga' is meant to gather up all the subsidiary parts of the discipline, including the very abandoning of attachment to fruit; he also clarifies that one cannot literally 'abandon' a fruit not yet obtained, so the abandoning must mean acting through non-desire and for the Lord.
Viśiṣṭādvaita, in their fuller words
This reading is brief and confident: the wise, joined with the discipline of understanding, perform action while giving up the fruit born of it, and by that very means are freed from the bondage of birth and reach the state free of disease. The teaching is presented as needing no elaborate defense because it is well known and established throughout the Upanishads.
Bhakti, in their fuller words
These devotional commentators let the goal carry a clearly Vaishnava color. The 'padam anāmayam' is glossed as the abode of Vishnu, called liberation, the eternal everlasting abode of bliss where there is no ailing; one names it Vaikuntha. Action is performed solely as the Lord's worship; the wise, by knowing the truth of the Self that is contained within action, are freed from birth and reach His painless abode. One adds the reasoning that since knowledge of one's own self is a cause of the knowledge of the Supreme Self, it is fitting that such self-knowledge is also a cause of attaining the Lord's abode, and turns the verse into a direct call: you too, a seeker of the highest good, should perform actions of this kind.
Śuddhādvaita, in their fuller words
This commentator answers a specific worry: if works carry their own fruit, how can they ever lead to devotion (bhakti)? The answer reframes both the doers and the goal in terms of bhakti. The wise are those who know the meaning of scripture, and the even intellect itself is what shows zeal in the pursuit of bhakti. The disease-free state they attain is the state of bhakti itself, which is the form of Bhagavan's feet; everywhere else there is illness and the like, but not in bhakti. He supports this with a scriptural verse on the absence of fear of death at the Lord's feet.
Kashmir Śaiva, in their fuller words
This brief gloss frames the verse as a contrast of two kinds of action. By reason of buddhi-yoga, the lower kind of action, the kind joined with a tainted fruit and inwardly empty, is set far off. The takeaway is an exhortation: therefore seek refuge in such an intellect, and pray for that by which that intellect is gained.
A modern reading, in their fuller words
These voices press the psychology and the universality of the teaching. Clinging to the fruits of action is named as the very cause of birth, since one takes a body in order to enjoy those fruits, so dropping the clinging removes the cause of rebirth. 'Giving up the fruit' is read strictly as giving up the desire, craving, sense of mine, and latent longing for the fruit, not the fruit itself, which is inevitable; and this renunciation of craving is something everyone can do. One commentator deepens 'anāmaya': amaya means disease, disease is a disorder (vikāra), so anāmaya means free of all disorder, and in truth this disorder-free state is one's own real nature, the Self beyond the qualities of nature; though the Self is ever changeless, it takes itself to be changing only because it identifies with the changeful body, and the moment it lets go of that assumed relation it simply experiences its own natural changelessness, which needs no labor because it is already and always the case. He also notes that the plural forms ('the wise', 'the joined-with-intellect') signal that whoever becomes established in evenness, without exception, reaches this state, making evenness of mind an unfailing and inclusive means.
A few questions to carry
These ask for understanding, not recall; each answer is settled by the commentary itself.
For a second sitting
Carry this with youwhat stays
Take the worry out of the word 'renunciation'. You are not being asked to throw away results or to stop caring about doing your work well. The crop comes up for anyone who sows; the fruit of what you do will reach you regardless. What you are invited to release is only the inner grip: the craving, the longing, the sense that the result is mine, the quiet hoarding of expectation. That release is within anyone's reach. And notice what it rests on. The disease-free state is not something you have to manufacture; it is already your own nature, untouched and changeless. You feel restless and bound only because you have taken yourself to be the changing body and its changing fortunes. The instant you loosen that assumed identification, you simply taste the steadiness that was always there. So practice it where you stand: do the work in front of you, do it as offering, and keep setting down the craving for its result, again and again. No special labor is needed to become free, because the freedom is not made; it is recognized.
What would this day's work be, done as offering, with the craving for its result set down?
Read deeper
Everything a full study holds, folded below.
Word by word
All the commentary, woven together
The commentary, woven together
machine-assisted draft, pending review
Convergence
his verse answers a precise question left open by the verses before it: how can action, which normally chains a person to its results, ever become a road to freedom? Krishna's answer is that the key lies in the inner disposition called buddhi-yukta, being joined with the even, balanced intellect (buddhi here means the steady, discerning mind, not mere cleverness). When work is done from that even mind, it stops binding and starts liberating. Several commentators read the verse as Krishna spelling out, step by step, the mechanism by which ordinary action turns into a means of release.
Braided from 9 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha
The pivotal move is 'abandoning the fruit born of action' (phalaṁ tyaktvā). The commentators are careful about what this does and does not mean. It does not mean refusing to act or pretending results will not come; it means acting without craving, desire, or attachment for the result, and offering the action instead to the Lord or doing it purely as worship. One modern voice makes the distinction sharp: as a farmer who sows seed will certainly get a crop whether or not he hankers for it, so the doer of action will certainly meet its fruit; what is given up is not the fruit, which is inevitable, but the desire, longing, sense of ownership, and inner clinging toward it, and giving up that craving is something everyone is capable of.
Braided from 11 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhvācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Swami Ramsukhdas · Swami Sivananda · Śrīla Baladeva · Ācārya Abhinavagupta · Sant Jñāneśvar · Lokmanya Tilak
Several commentators identify exactly what 'fruit' is being renounced and why it amounts to bondage: the fruit of action is the obtaining of a body, whether a pleasing, desirable body (such as a divine birth) or an unpleasing, undesirable one (such as an animal birth). To gain any such body is to be born again, and birth itself is the bondage. So renouncing the fruit, rightly understood, is renouncing the whole machinery of rebirth. This is why the very next phrase follows naturally: the wise become 'freed from the bondage of birth' (janma-bandha-vinirmuktāḥ), because the desire that fuels rebirth has been let go.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Swami Ramsukhdas
The reward is 'padam anāmayam', the state free of disease or affliction (anāmaya means without illness, without any disturbance or disorder), and this state is liberation. The commentators stress that those who reach it are 'manīṣiṇaḥ', the wise, the knowers, those who understand the meaning of scripture; the freedom is not blind but illumined. Many add that this freedom can begin even while one still lives, as liberation-while-living: the wise realize their own true nature here and now, untouched by good and bad action alike, and so escape the turning wheel of birth and death.
Braided from 13 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Sant Jñāneśvar · Swami Ramsukhdas · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrīla Baladeva · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Sivananda
Read in its setting, the verse is also an exhortation, not just a description. Because those who give up craving for fruit and act with the even mind are purified, lose the inner causes of rebirth, and reach the supreme state, the lesson lands on the listener: you too, as a seeker of the highest good, should take up exactly this kind of action. The verse thus closes the immediate teaching on buddhi-yoga by pressing it home as the path to be walked.
Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrīla Baladeva · Ācārya Abhinavagupta · Swami Ramsukhdas
Divergence
Advaita Vedānta
For these commentators the chain runs through self-knowledge. Acting with the even mind and without desire for fruit purifies the inner being; that purity gives rise to the discernment of the Self disclosed by the great scriptural sentence 'that thou art' (tat tvam asi); and that knowledge, by destroying ignorance and its effects, brings liberation. The liberated state is reached 'non-differently': it is not arrival at a separate place but the realization of one's own self as Brahman, of the nature of bliss, fearless, free of all ill. One commentator works through a careful objection about the word 'buddhi': taken merely as the even intellect, balance of mind cannot by itself wipe out good and bad deeds, so a second, fitting sense is offered, that the buddhi here is the understanding whose object is the unlimited reality, which directly frees one from the bondage of birth. Another raises and answers the worry that giving up even good deeds and their fruit might be a loss of the human goal, replying that what is gained, the supreme human goal of liberation, infinitely outweighs the trivial fruit set aside.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri
Dvaita
Here the verse is read as laying out a strict order of means: the fruit of action is given up by offering it without desire to the Lord; yoga (disciplined action) is the means to knowledge; and knowledge is the means to release. So action does not free directly but through knowledge, and knowledge leads to the supreme station. One commentator labors over the grammar and structure to show that this one verse expounds two things at once, the means to knowledge (yoga) and liberation itself, and insists that the single word 'yoga' is meant to gather up all the subsidiary parts of the discipline, including the very abandoning of attachment to fruit; he also clarifies that one cannot literally 'abandon' a fruit not yet obtained, so the abandoning must mean acting through non-desire and for the Lord.
Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha
Viśiṣṭādvaita
This reading is brief and confident: the wise, joined with the discipline of understanding, perform action while giving up the fruit born of it, and by that very means are freed from the bondage of birth and reach the state free of disease. The teaching is presented as needing no elaborate defense because it is well known and established throughout the Upanishads.
Rāmānujācārya
Bhakti
These devotional commentators let the goal carry a clearly Vaishnava color. The 'padam anāmayam' is glossed as the abode of Vishnu, called liberation, the eternal everlasting abode of bliss where there is no ailing; one names it Vaikuntha. Action is performed solely as the Lord's worship; the wise, by knowing the truth of the Self that is contained within action, are freed from birth and reach His painless abode. One adds the reasoning that since knowledge of one's own self is a cause of the knowledge of the Supreme Self, it is fitting that such self-knowledge is also a cause of attaining the Lord's abode, and turns the verse into a direct call: you too, a seeker of the highest good, should perform actions of this kind.
Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar
Śuddhādvaita
This commentator answers a specific worry: if works carry their own fruit, how can they ever lead to devotion (bhakti)? The answer reframes both the doers and the goal in terms of bhakti. The wise are those who know the meaning of scripture, and the even intellect itself is what shows zeal in the pursuit of bhakti. The disease-free state they attain is the state of bhakti itself, which is the form of Bhagavan's feet; everywhere else there is illness and the like, but not in bhakti. He supports this with a scriptural verse on the absence of fear of death at the Lord's feet.
Śrī Puruṣottama
Kashmir Shaivism
This brief gloss frames the verse as a contrast of two kinds of action. By reason of buddhi-yoga, the lower kind of action, the kind joined with a tainted fruit and inwardly empty, is set far off. The takeaway is an exhortation: therefore seek refuge in such an intellect, and pray for that by which that intellect is gained.
Ācārya Abhinavagupta
Modern
These voices press the psychology and the universality of the teaching. Clinging to the fruits of action is named as the very cause of birth, since one takes a body in order to enjoy those fruits, so dropping the clinging removes the cause of rebirth. 'Giving up the fruit' is read strictly as giving up the desire, craving, sense of mine, and latent longing for the fruit, not the fruit itself, which is inevitable; and this renunciation of craving is something everyone can do. One commentator deepens 'anāmaya': amaya means disease, disease is a disorder (vikāra), so anāmaya means free of all disorder, and in truth this disorder-free state is one's own real nature, the Self beyond the qualities of nature; though the Self is ever changeless, it takes itself to be changing only because it identifies with the changeful body, and the moment it lets go of that assumed relation it simply experiences its own natural changelessness, which needs no labor because it is already and always the case. He also notes that the plural forms ('the wise', 'the joined-with-intellect') signal that whoever becomes established in evenness, without exception, reaches this state, making evenness of mind an unfailing and inclusive means.
Swami Ramsukhdas · Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak
A Seeker Asks
If the fruit of my actions is going to arrive whether I want it or not, what does it actually change for me to 'give up' that fruit, and how can a mere shift in inner attitude be powerful enough to end rebirth?
Start with what is really being given up. The commentators are explicit that you cannot abandon a fruit that has not yet come, so 'abandoning the fruit' cannot mean discarding results. It means abandoning the desire, craving, and sense of ownership toward the result, while still acting, and offering the action as worship to the Lord. The result may still come; your inner clinging to it does not.
Swami Ramsukhdas · Śrī Jayatīrtha · Madhvācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī
That inner shift is powerful precisely because craving is the engine of rebirth, not action by itself. One takes a body in order to enjoy the fruits one hankers after; the 'fruit' of action is exactly the obtaining of a desirable or undesirable body, which is birth, which is bondage. Remove the desire, and you remove the cause that keeps producing new births. This is why letting go of attachment, and not some further heroic act, is what frees one from the bondage of birth.
Swami Sivananda · Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Dhanapati Sūri · Swami Ramsukhdas
There is also a maturing that the attitude makes possible. Acting without craving purifies the mind, and that purity opens into the discernment of one's true Self, which several commentators tie to the scriptural recognition 'that thou art'; it is this knowledge that finally dissolves ignorance and its effects. So the change of attitude is not the whole journey by itself; it is the indispensable first turn that clears the way for self-knowledge, and through that for release.
Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śaṅkarācārya · Madhvācārya · Śrīla Baladeva
Finally, the freedom is not as far off or as fragile as it sounds, because the disease-free state is your own changeless nature rather than a prize to be built. You feel bound only through identifying with the changeful body; loosen that identification and the natural steadiness is simply experienced, here and now, even while you live. And the verse uses the plural deliberately: everyone who becomes settled in evenness of mind reaches this, no one is excluded, which makes the shift of attitude an unfailing and available means rather than a rare feat.
Swami Ramsukhdas · Sant Jñāneśvar · Śaṅkarācārya · Dhanapati Sūri
Contemplation
Take the worry out of the word 'renunciation'. You are not being asked to throw away results or to stop caring about doing your work well. The crop comes up for anyone who sows; the fruit of what you do will reach you regardless. What you are invited to release is only the inner grip: the craving, the longing, the sense that the result is mine, the quiet hoarding of expectation. That release is within anyone's reach. And notice what it rests on. The disease-free state is not something you have to manufacture; it is already your own nature, untouched and changeless. You feel restless and bound only because you have taken yourself to be the changing body and its changing fortunes. The instant you loosen that assumed identification, you simply taste the steadiness that was always there. So practice it where you stand: do the work in front of you, do it as offering, and keep setting down the craving for its result, again and again. No special labor is needed to become free, because the freedom is not made; it is recognized.
Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas
All the translations and commentary
Pull up a chair.
You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.