The yogi settled in oneness who worships God in all beings abides in Him, however he lives.
It is easy to think that nearness to God depends on the right outer life, the right work renounced or kept. Yet once the inner realization is secured, no manner of living can unsettle it; the one who sees the Lord in all beings already dwells in Him.
The yogi who, established in unity, worships Me as dwelling in all beings, abides in Me, whatever his way of living.
Having taught the yogi to see the one Self in all beings and all beings in that Self, Krishna now names the fruit of that seeing: such a one, worshipping Him present everywhere, abides in Him whatever his way of living.
Where they agreethe convergence
Across schools and centuries the commentators come to the same ground. These are the points they share, and the voices that hold each one.
Take your stand in this: the one Lord, the one Self, is the inner ground threaded through everything that is, and to worship Him there is to hold to oneness itself.
Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Dvaita, Śuddhādvaita, Bhedābheda, Kashmir Śaiva, Bhakti, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Madhusūdana · Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati · Rāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika · Madhva · Vallabha · Bhāskara · Abhinavagupta · Śrīdhara · Viśvanātha · Baladeva · Jñāneśvar · Sivananda · Tilak · RamsukhdasIn Śaṅkara, Madhusūdana, and 15 others’ words
The verse describes the yogi who worships God present in all beings while firmly established in oneness (ekatvam asthitah). The commentators agree that 'ekatvam' means taking one's stand in the realization that one and the same supreme reality stands within every being. This is not the worship of a far-off deity but the recognition that the one Lord, or the one Self, is the inner ground threaded through everything that exists. The yogi 'bhajati,' worships or serves, this all-pervading reality, and that worship is itself the firm holding to oneness.
Once that inner seeing is secured, no way of living can unsettle it; act or refrain, renounce or work, you do not fall from your standing in God.
Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Dvaita, Bhedābheda, Bhakti, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Madhusūdana · Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati · Rāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika · Madhva · Jayatīrtha · Bhāskara · Śrīdhara · Viśvanātha · Baladeva · Jñāneśvar · Sivananda · TilakIn Śaṅkara, Madhusūdana, and 13 others’ words
The single most stressed point is freedom of outer conduct: 'sarvatha vartamano 'pi,' however he conducts himself, in every way he may move, he still abides in God (mayi vartate). The commentators read this to mean that once the inner realization is secured, no manner of living can unsecure it. Whether such a yogi acts or refrains from acting, whether he renounces all work or carries out enjoined work, he does not fall from his standing in God. His liberation is not held hostage to his external behavior.
What is given here is not a reward kept for later but a freedom already present: held back by nothing, you abide in God and do not fall back into the world.
Across Advaita, Dvaita, Bhakti, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati · Madhva · Jayatīrtha · Śrīdhara · Viśvanātha · Baladeva · SivanandaIn Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 9 others’ words
The fruit named here is liberation that is unobstructed and present already, not merely promised for later. Such a yogi is 'ever-liberated,' held back by nothing; he abides in God and does not fall again into worldly existence. The Advaita voices ground this in scripture that even the gods cannot work the knower's fall, 'for he becomes their very self.' This abiding is the secure end-state, the supreme abode, into which no obstacle can intrude.
And do not mistake "however he lives" for leave to do wrong; it praises how unshakable the seeing is, in one whose very motives for wrongdoing have already fallen away.
Across Advaita, Dvaita, Bhedābheda, BhaktiĀnandagiri · Madhusūdana · Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati · Madhva · Jayatīrtha · Bhāskara · ŚrīdharaIn Ānandagiri, Madhusūdana, and 6 others’ words
Several commentators add a careful qualification about wrongdoing. The phrase 'in every way he may move' is not a license to act wrongly; it is praise of the realization, not permission for misconduct. Such a knower, free of the attachment and aversion that drive wrong action, would not in fact freely violate what is right; his disciplines and impressions hold. The clause concedes even the extreme case only to magnify how unshakable knowledge is, in the spirit of 'even slaying he does not slay nor is he bound.'
This is the shared ground; it can be carried as it is. Below is where they differ.
Where they differthe divergence
Advaita Vedānta, in their fuller words
These commentators read 'ekatvam' as strict non-difference: the yogi realizes the absolute identity of his own self with the Lord, the bare being threaded through all, by removing the difference of adjuncts, just as the space inside a pot is seen to be the one great space. Madhusudana frames the whole verse as the determination of the great sentence 'that thou art' (tat tvam asi): 'that' is the Lord abiding as substrate in all beings, 'thou' is the worshiper's own self, and worship here means making their non-difference directly evident through the realization 'I am Brahman.' Such a knower becomes liberated-in-life (jivanmukta); his outer career continues only by the momentum of action already begun to bear fruit (prarabdha), in whatever mode (renunciation like Yajnavalkya, enjoined action like Janaka, or even forbidden action like Dattatreya), yet he never falls from his identity with the supreme Self. The concession of free conduct is granted only provisionally, to praise knowledge.
Viśiṣṭādvaita, in their fuller words
These commentators deny that 'ekatvam' means a monist merger that erases distinction. The oneness is the unity of inner ground that holds many beings together in one Lord; the yogi gives up only the difference that belongs to matter, not his own distinctness from God. Even when he rises from discipline and goes about in the world, he sees in his own self and in all beings, at all times, only the likeness to the Lord. Crucially, the equality with the Lord is narrow and exact: the candidate is equated with the Lord only in not being bound by action (since, like the Lord, he has no fruit-bound resolves left), and never in lordship itself. The freedom of outer conduct is the freedom from anxiety about external behavior that follows once the inner stance is secured.
Dvaita, in their fuller words
These commentators read 'ekatvam' as the settled view that everywhere there is but one Lord, not as identity of the self with God. For one who sees thus directly, the fruit of knowledge, liberation, is sure and unobstructed. But they insist on a real difference even in the liberated: a decrease of bliss and the like does indeed exist, so the worship of righteousness is never simply 'of no avail.' They press the question of why, if liberation is unobstructed even amid unrighteousness, such a knower would do unrighteousness at all, and answer that for the most part he does none; when a lapse occurs by the force of prarabdha, even a great unrighteousness in such a one is only an indicator of a great suffering still to be undergone, not a cancellation of his liberation. A slight sin done through heedlessness is burnt to ashes.
Śuddhādvaita, in their fuller words
These commentators read the verse through the lens of loving service (bhajana). Vallabha holds that even the jnani who has already reached 'ekatva' is carried further by the act of worship: he gives up even the bare unity-stand in favor of a serving-relation with the Blessed One as his master (svami), becoming His servant like Suka and Uddhava, on the authority that 'if the jnani worships Krishna there is none higher than he.' Purushottama reads the yogi as established in belonging to the Lord (sajatiya-bhava) and as one whose outward conduct toward all beings, undertaken for the teaching of servitude (dasya) and the like, is itself his inward standing in the Lord: the work done for others' awakening is itself the dwelling of the worker in God.
Bhedābheda, in their fuller words
Bhaskara reads the abiding in God through the image of water and its forms: everything that is seen, when seen as having Brahman for its self, becomes Brahman alone, just as foam and waves, when seen as having water for their substance, are comprehended within that very water. So even while the yogi exists through his mind in the Lord's modification, the manifold world of speech, he exists in God alone. He explicitly rejects the reading of others that 'sarvatha vartamano 'pi' permits acting as one pleases: that is not right, for one of this kind does not in fact act according to his own pleasure.
Kashmir Śaiva, in their fuller words
Abhinavagupta gives the most compressed reading: the one who is pervaded by knowledge, knowing the Blessed One as all-pervading in His oneness, is necessarily not stained, even though he has come to be in every state. The stress falls on the non-staining: existence in any and every condition cannot defile one whose knowledge has thus pervaded him.
Bhakti, in their fuller words
These commentators stress that such a yogi is no longer the servant of injunction (vidhi): the verse releases him from bondage to ritual command. Sridhara turns the doubter's fear on its head, the very letting go of karma in such a one is no falling away but abidance in the Lord. Vishvanatha and Baladeva note that the worship here can belong even to the stage prior to direct experience of God, worship by hearing and remembering. Baladeva adds a distinctly Gaudiya note: the Lord dwells distinctly in the hearts of all beings in His four-armed form, and the yogi who realizes the non-difference of these many forms of the one body, by the greatness of experiencing the Lord's inconceivable power, has his will-to-act burnt away and finds liberation marked by nearness to God, citing 'though one, He appears as many.' Jnaneshwar develops a chain of images, cloth and yarn, gold and ornaments, one tree with many leaves, for the seeing of the one in the many, and stresses that such a yogi becomes all-pervading through the greatness of his experience of the Lord's power.
A modern reading, in their fuller words
Sivananda and Tilak give the verse in a broadly non-dual key: the one who has dissolved all duality in the underlying unity, realizing God as the Self of all, dwells always in God whatever his mode of living, and is ever liberated; Sivananda offers the butcher Sadana, who lived in God because his mind was ever fixed at the Lord's feet. Gandhi-Desai reads it as the extinction of the ego: so long as 'self' subsists the Supreme Self is absent, and when 'self' is extinguished the Supreme Self is seen everywhere. Ramsukhdas, distinctively, reads 'ekatvam' not as identity of essence (svarupa-ekata) as in Advaita, but as a non-difference (abhinnata) born of supreme love: as husband and wife of two bodies, or two friends, count themselves one through utter affection, so the devotee, through utmost love (atyanta sneha), becomes inseparable from God while remaining, in appearance, two; the worship of God present in all is the seeing that the whole moving and unmoving world is God alone, 'vasudevah sarvam.'
A few questions to carry
These ask for understanding, not recall; each answer is settled by the commentary itself.
For a second sitting
Carry this with youwhat stays
Ramsukhdas points to a practice anyone can begin now, before any high realization: train yourself to see that in every place, every time, every thing, person, event, and circumstance, God alone is fully present, that the whole moving and unmoving world is nothing but God. This is the meaning of 'vasudevah sarvam,' all is God. He says the inseparability the verse calls 'ekatvam' is not first an austerity but a fruit of love: as two people who love utterly stop counting themselves as two, so as your affection for God deepens, the sense of distance dissolves, and you find yourself dwelling in Him even while you move through ordinary life. The invitation is to let the seeing and the loving grow together, until worship is no longer a separate act but simply how you meet everything you encounter.
Begin where you are: train yourself to see that in every place and every moment God alone is fully present, and let the loving and the seeing grow together until worship is simply how you meet all that you encounter.
Read deeper
Everything a full study holds, folded below.
Word by word
All the commentary, woven together
The commentary, woven together
machine-assisted draft, pending review
Convergence
he verse describes the yogi who worships God present in all beings while firmly established in oneness (ekatvam asthitah). The commentators agree that 'ekatvam' means taking one's stand in the realization that one and the same supreme reality stands within every being. This is not the worship of a far-off deity but the recognition that the one Lord, or the one Self, is the inner ground threaded through everything that exists. The yogi 'bhajati,' worships or serves, this all-pervading reality, and that worship is itself the firm holding to oneness.
Braided from 17 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Madhvācārya · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Bhāskara · Ācārya Abhinavagupta · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar · Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas
The single most stressed point is freedom of outer conduct: 'sarvatha vartamano 'pi,' however he conducts himself, in every way he may move, he still abides in God (mayi vartate). The commentators read this to mean that once the inner realization is secured, no manner of living can unsecure it. Whether such a yogi acts or refrains from acting, whether he renounces all work or carries out enjoined work, he does not fall from his standing in God. His liberation is not held hostage to his external behavior.
Braided from 15 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha · Śrī Bhāskara · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar · Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak
The fruit named here is liberation that is unobstructed and present already, not merely promised for later. Such a yogi is 'ever-liberated,' held back by nothing; he abides in God and does not fall again into worldly existence. The Advaita voices ground this in scripture that even the gods cannot work the knower's fall, 'for he becomes their very self.' This abiding is the secure end-state, the supreme abode, into which no obstacle can intrude.
Braided from 11 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Sivananda
Several commentators add a careful qualification about wrongdoing. The phrase 'in every way he may move' is not a license to act wrongly; it is praise of the realization, not permission for misconduct. Such a knower, free of the attachment and aversion that drive wrong action, would not in fact freely violate what is right; his disciplines and impressions hold. The clause concedes even the extreme case only to magnify how unshakable knowledge is, in the spirit of 'even slaying he does not slay nor is he bound.'
Braided from 8 commentators
Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha · Śrī Bhāskara · Śrīdhara Svāmī
Divergence
Advaita Vedānta
These commentators read 'ekatvam' as strict non-difference: the yogi realizes the absolute identity of his own self with the Lord, the bare being threaded through all, by removing the difference of adjuncts, just as the space inside a pot is seen to be the one great space. Madhusudana frames the whole verse as the determination of the great sentence 'that thou art' (tat tvam asi): 'that' is the Lord abiding as substrate in all beings, 'thou' is the worshiper's own self, and worship here means making their non-difference directly evident through the realization 'I am Brahman.' Such a knower becomes liberated-in-life (jivanmukta); his outer career continues only by the momentum of action already begun to bear fruit (prarabdha), in whatever mode (renunciation like Yajnavalkya, enjoined action like Janaka, or even forbidden action like Dattatreya), yet he never falls from his identity with the supreme Self. The concession of free conduct is granted only provisionally, to praise knowledge.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri
Viśiṣṭādvaita
These commentators deny that 'ekatvam' means a monist merger that erases distinction. The oneness is the unity of inner ground that holds many beings together in one Lord; the yogi gives up only the difference that belongs to matter, not his own distinctness from God. Even when he rises from discipline and goes about in the world, he sees in his own self and in all beings, at all times, only the likeness to the Lord. Crucially, the equality with the Lord is narrow and exact: the candidate is equated with the Lord only in not being bound by action (since, like the Lord, he has no fruit-bound resolves left), and never in lordship itself. The freedom of outer conduct is the freedom from anxiety about external behavior that follows once the inner stance is secured.
Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika
Dvaita
These commentators read 'ekatvam' as the settled view that everywhere there is but one Lord, not as identity of the self with God. For one who sees thus directly, the fruit of knowledge, liberation, is sure and unobstructed. But they insist on a real difference even in the liberated: a decrease of bliss and the like does indeed exist, so the worship of righteousness is never simply 'of no avail.' They press the question of why, if liberation is unobstructed even amid unrighteousness, such a knower would do unrighteousness at all, and answer that for the most part he does none; when a lapse occurs by the force of prarabdha, even a great unrighteousness in such a one is only an indicator of a great suffering still to be undergone, not a cancellation of his liberation. A slight sin done through heedlessness is burnt to ashes.
Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha
Śuddhādvaita
These commentators read the verse through the lens of loving service (bhajana). Vallabha holds that even the jnani who has already reached 'ekatva' is carried further by the act of worship: he gives up even the bare unity-stand in favor of a serving-relation with the Blessed One as his master (svami), becoming His servant like Suka and Uddhava, on the authority that 'if the jnani worships Krishna there is none higher than he.' Purushottama reads the yogi as established in belonging to the Lord (sajatiya-bhava) and as one whose outward conduct toward all beings, undertaken for the teaching of servitude (dasya) and the like, is itself his inward standing in the Lord: the work done for others' awakening is itself the dwelling of the worker in God.
Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama
Bhedabheda
Bhaskara reads the abiding in God through the image of water and its forms: everything that is seen, when seen as having Brahman for its self, becomes Brahman alone, just as foam and waves, when seen as having water for their substance, are comprehended within that very water. So even while the yogi exists through his mind in the Lord's modification, the manifold world of speech, he exists in God alone. He explicitly rejects the reading of others that 'sarvatha vartamano 'pi' permits acting as one pleases: that is not right, for one of this kind does not in fact act according to his own pleasure.
Śrī Bhāskara
Kashmir Shaivism
Abhinavagupta gives the most compressed reading: the one who is pervaded by knowledge, knowing the Blessed One as all-pervading in His oneness, is necessarily not stained, even though he has come to be in every state. The stress falls on the non-staining: existence in any and every condition cannot defile one whose knowledge has thus pervaded him.
Ācārya Abhinavagupta
Bhakti
These commentators stress that such a yogi is no longer the servant of injunction (vidhi): the verse releases him from bondage to ritual command. Sridhara turns the doubter's fear on its head, the very letting go of karma in such a one is no falling away but abidance in the Lord. Vishvanatha and Baladeva note that the worship here can belong even to the stage prior to direct experience of God, worship by hearing and remembering. Baladeva adds a distinctly Gaudiya note: the Lord dwells distinctly in the hearts of all beings in His four-armed form, and the yogi who realizes the non-difference of these many forms of the one body, by the greatness of experiencing the Lord's inconceivable power, has his will-to-act burnt away and finds liberation marked by nearness to God, citing 'though one, He appears as many.' Jnaneshwar develops a chain of images, cloth and yarn, gold and ornaments, one tree with many leaves, for the seeing of the one in the many, and stresses that such a yogi becomes all-pervading through the greatness of his experience of the Lord's power.
Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar
Modern
Sivananda and Tilak give the verse in a broadly non-dual key: the one who has dissolved all duality in the underlying unity, realizing God as the Self of all, dwells always in God whatever his mode of living, and is ever liberated; Sivananda offers the butcher Sadana, who lived in God because his mind was ever fixed at the Lord's feet. Gandhi-Desai reads it as the extinction of the ego: so long as 'self' subsists the Supreme Self is absent, and when 'self' is extinguished the Supreme Self is seen everywhere. Ramsukhdas, distinctively, reads 'ekatvam' not as identity of essence (svarupa-ekata) as in Advaita, but as a non-difference (abhinnata) born of supreme love: as husband and wife of two bodies, or two friends, count themselves one through utter affection, so the devotee, through utmost love (atyanta sneha), becomes inseparable from God while remaining, in appearance, two; the worship of God present in all is the seeing that the whole moving and unmoving world is God alone, 'vasudevah sarvam.'
Swami Sivananda · Mahatma Gandhi · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas
A Seeker Asks
If the realized yogi abides in God no matter how he behaves, does this verse make morality optional once you have 'realized'?
No. The commentators who raise this very objection answer it directly: 'in every way he may move' is praise of the realization, not permission for misconduct. The clause concedes even the extreme case only to show how unshakable knowledge is; it does not invite wrong action.
Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrī Jayatīrtha
More pointedly, such a knower does not in fact want to do wrong. The attachment and aversion that drive wrong action have fallen away in him, so forbidden action becomes psychologically impossible; for the most part he does no unrighteousness at all, and his disciplines and impressions still hold. The freedom described is not a loosening of conscience but the disappearance of the motives for wrongdoing.
Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Madhvācārya · Śrī Bhāskara
And the schools that affirm real difference add that conduct still has weight. Even where liberation itself is not cancelled, a lapse by the force of past momentum shows up as suffering still to be undergone, and a decrease of bliss is real; so righteousness is never simply 'of no avail.' The verse secures the inner standing against anxiety about outer behavior; it does not abolish the seriousness of how one lives.
Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha
Contemplation
Ramsukhdas points to a practice anyone can begin now, before any high realization: train yourself to see that in every place, every time, every thing, person, event, and circumstance, God alone is fully present, that the whole moving and unmoving world is nothing but God. This is the meaning of 'vasudevah sarvam,' all is God. He says the inseparability the verse calls 'ekatvam' is not first an austerity but a fruit of love: as two people who love utterly stop counting themselves as two, so as your affection for God deepens, the sense of distance dissolves, and you find yourself dwelling in Him even while you move through ordinary life. The invitation is to let the seeing and the loving grow together, until worship is no longer a separate act but simply how you meet everything you encounter.
Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas
All the translations and commentary
Pull up a chair.
You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.