StudyVedanta
Skip to the verse
V.136.126.14
Read slowly

Before the mind can be still, teach the body to stop moving.

It is tempting to read this as a rule about posture for its own sake. It is really an instruction about where restlessness begins, and how to close that door first.

13Chapter 6
The verseSpoken by Krishna
Voices6 commentators · 5 schools · modern voices
The readingAbout 5 minutes, unhurried
समं कायशिरोग्रीवं धारयन्नचलं स्थिरः। संप्रेक्ष्य नासिकाग्रं स्वं दिशश्चानवलोकयन्
samaṁ kāya-śhiro-grīvaṁ dhārayann achalaṁ sthiraḥ samprekṣhya nāsikāgraṁ svaṁ diśhaśh chānavalokayan

Hold the trunk, head, and neck straight and unmoving, sit steady, and let the eyes come to rest, half-lidded, near the tip of your own nose, without wandering to glance around.

Bhagavad Gita 6.13
0:00 / 0:00

Saved for this reading session

Three movements · tap a label to switch

Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda

Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur

The reading read whole, as one unhurried piece

Where it stands

Krishna has just named where to sit and what kind of seat to prepare. Now he turns to the meditator's own body: how it is to be held, and where the eyes are to rest, once seated.

The teaching

Before the mind can settle, the body has to stop asking for attention.

Hold your trunk, your head, and your neck even and erect, in one line running from the base of the spine to the crown. What is meant by the body here is specifically the trunk, the middle portion, since the head and neck are named on their own. Even means straight and unbent. Unmoving goes further than that: not swaying, not trembling, not even a small inward quiver. Steady means firm in effort, sustained, not a posture you hold for a moment and then let slip. A body can be held even and still be liable to sway, which is exactly why the verse insists on stillness beyond mere evenness, until the senses stop being pulled toward things outside. On the eyes, do not stare at your nose. Let the gaze rest near its tip only as a means, with the eyes drawn inward and half-open, neither shut, which risks sliding the mind toward sleep, nor wide open, which risks scattering it toward objects. And do not let your eyes wander to glance around at your surroundings, because that alone is enough to break the sitting. The settled gaze and the unwandering eye work together, one guarding against dullness, the other against distraction. None of this is the point in itself. It is a support, built with real care, so that something else, described in the verse that follows, can happen: the mind, at last, comes to rest.

The doubt that rises

Is meditation really bound this closely to exact bodily mechanics, or is all of this posture and gaze instruction just scaffolding that falls away once the deeper, inward work begins?

Where the paths divide

Advaita Vedanta

Read as a support for composing the mind on the Self.

Take the nose-tip gaze as needing the quiet supply of the words 'as it were,' even though the verse does not state them outright. You are not really told to stare at your nose. What is meant is only the inward turning of the eyes, drawn back from every object. The reasoning is exact: if literal nose-gazing were meant, your mind would come to rest on the nose rather than the Self, but a later verse in this same chapter plainly asks for the mind to be settled in the Self. So the gaze is only ever a means of freeing the eye, never an end worth resting on in itself.

Vishishtadvaita

Read with the outer stillness placed directly in service of a mind fixed on the Lord.

Take the posture and the inner aim as named almost in a single breath. Hold body, head, and neck even and unmoving, steady on your support, not looking about in any direction, the gaze resting at the tip of your nose. And immediately: your self at peace, your mind utterly stilled, free of fear, joined with continence, thought fixed on the Lord, attentive, sitting intent on Him alone. The bodily discipline is not treated as a separate technical problem to be solved before devotion begins; it is already devotion's first working shape.

Dvaita

Honest gap: the source does not comment on this verse's specifics on its own terms.

Here the extant commentary is thin almost to the point of absence. What survives treats 6.12 through 6.14 as a single passage, and the full remark, given at 6.12, only glosses joining oneself to the yoga of samadhi, without turning to address the trunk-and-neck posture or the nose-tip gaze that this verse names. Rather than invent a fuller reading in his voice, the honest step is to say so plainly. On a Dvaita-consistent extension, not his recorded word, one could read the steadiness described here as a discipline the dependent soul only takes up by the Lord's sanction, a delegated competence rather than an autonomous mastery. But that is an extrapolation offered as such, not a comment Madhva is known to have made on this verse.

Kashmir Shaivism

Read from one preserved line inside a wider passage on verses 6.10 to 6.15.

Only one line reaches this verse directly from what survives of Abhinavagupta's commentary: fixing the gaze at the tip of the nose means not glancing around in every direction. It sits inside a larger discussion of how mastery over the self is actually won, where he asks his own question and answers it in stages: when posture grows steady, time grows steady, and from that the mind grows steady, until the mind's intentions and the senses come under one rule, and the yogin holds the Lord as the highest. Beyond this single preserved thread, a fuller reading in his own voice on the fine mechanics of the eye is not something the source supports; anything further is only a marked possibility, not his recorded word.

Bhakti

Read as the most detailed technical unpacking among the surviving comments.

Take 'kaya' here as meaning specifically the trunk, the middle portion of the body, since head and neck are already named in the same breath; the straight, unbent line runs from the base of your spine to the crown of your head. Steadiness means firm, sustained effort, not a momentary posture. On the eyes, half-close them: not shut, since that risks carrying the mind toward sleep, and not open to the room, since that risks carrying it outward toward objects. The gaze rests near the nose only so the seeing organ stops collecting impressions and begins, instead, to settle. Notice, too, that the sentence's own construction is incomplete on its own, carrying straight into the next verse's account of what such a settled meditator is like within.

Modern

Read as a cause-and-effect account, body and mind as one discipline.

Take the instruction as continuous with the seat already described: having told the outer arrangement, the verse now tells how the body is held upon it. Steady practice of holding trunk, head, and neck in this one straight line brings about the absence of the body's shaking, and that shaking, on this reading, is itself a symptom of a mind that has not yet settled. Firmness of body and firmness of effort are two names for a single discipline. The eyes, meanwhile, are kept free of both sleepiness and distraction, resting at the nose-tip without straying to the four directions, since that alone would be enough to block the practice.

All six readings agree on the outer shape: a straight, unmoving trunk, head, and neck, and a gaze drawn inward and half-settled near the tip of the nose. They part on how much weight the posture itself is asked to carry, and where its point finally lies. For Advaita the gaze is a corrective, freeing the eye so the mind can rest on the Self alone. For Vishishtadvaita and Bhakti it opens directly toward the Lord held in thought. For the source available on Dvaita and Kashmir Shaivism at this exact verse, the record itself is too thin to settle the question in either acarya's own words, leaving only marked extensions rather than firm positions. The Modern reading treats the whole matter as cause and effect, body steadying mind, without settling on either the Self or the Lord as the further destination. This page does not choose between them.

A question to carry

When you notice your own body beginning to slump, sway, or fidget mid-task, what is it usually asking for, and what happens if you meet that asking with stillness instead of another shift of position?

So let your trunk, your head, and your neck settle into one straight, unstrained line, and let your eyes come quietly to rest. What grows still in the body has a way, in its own time, of teaching the mind how to grow still as well.

Each school is voiced from the commentators named above. Their full words, every translation, and where the schools agree and differ wait in the reading desk just below. Open the commentary desk.

Krishna has just named the place and the seat for meditation; here he turns to the meditator's own body, telling exactly how it is to be held once seated, before the mind's steadiness is described next.

Where they agreethe convergence

A body held straight, unmoving, and steady stops generating its own noise, and only then can the eyes, and through them the mind, be gently drawn inward rather than outward.

Across schools and centuries the commentators come to the same ground. These are the points they share, and the voices that hold each one.

3schools

Hold the trunk, the head, and the neck in one straight, unbent line, from the base of the spine to the crown, and let that line be still, not merely held even for a moment.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and 2 others’ words

The verse gives the bodily posture for meditation: hold the trunk, the head, and the neck even and erect, unmoving and steady. 'Kaya' names specifically the trunk, the middle portion, since head and neck are called out on their own; the line to be kept straight runs from the base of the spine to the crown. The aim is a posture so settled that the body stops calling attention to itself.

Asked in question 1, below
2schools

Let the stillness go deeper than appearance: firm like a rock, so that even a small inward trembling settles and the senses stop reaching toward things outside.

Across Advaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Śrīdhara, and 1 others’ words

'Unmoving' is added deliberately, because a body can be held even and still sway or tremble; the stillness demanded goes further than outward evenness. The body is meant to become as fixed as a statue, so firm that the senses stop being pulled toward outside objects, and 'steady' names a sustained, effortful firmness rather than a momentary stillness.

2schools

When told to gaze at the tip of your own nose, do not stare; let the eyes come to rest half-open, neither shut toward sleep nor wide open toward distraction.

Across Advaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Śrīdhara, and 1 others’ words

Gazing at the tip of one's own nose is not to be taken as literal staring. The shared reading draws the eyes inward and half-shuts them: not closed, since that risks sliding toward sleep, and not open to the room, since that risks scattering toward objects. The nose-tip gaze is a means of freeing the eye from outward collection, not an object of attention in its own right.

Asked in question 3, below
3schools

Do not let the eyes wander to the four directions, since that alone is enough to break the sitting; the settled gaze and the unwandering eye stand guard together.

Across Advaita, Bhakti, ViśiṣṭādvaitaŚaṅkara · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana · Rāmānuja
In Śaṅkara, Śrīdhara, and 2 others’ words

The closing instruction against looking about at the directions works together with the settled gaze: one guards against the dullness of closed eyes, the other against the distraction of wandering ones. Several commentators note that the sentence is grammatically incomplete on its own, carrying forward into the description of the meditator's inner state in the verse that follows.

3schools

None of this is the destination. It is named so precisely because it is meant to fall away from notice, freeing the whole of your attention for what comes next.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and 2 others’ words

However the schools differ on where the settled gaze finally comes to rest, all treat the outer stillness as inseparable from an inner aim: the body is disciplined so that something beyond the body, whether the Self or the Lord held in thought, can be reached without the interference of a restless frame.

Asked in question 5, below

This is the shared ground; it can be carried as it is. Below is where they differ.

Where they differthe divergence

The question they answer differently
Is the exact posture and the nose-tip gaze meditation's real substance, or only a scaffold built to let something else, the settling of the mind, take place?
The traditional commentators
Advaita Vedāntasee this school across the GītāŚaṅkara
The gaze is not literal nose-looking; it is the eye drawn inward so the mind can settle on the Self, not on the nose.
Where the mind is finally meant to rest.
Viśiṣṭādvaitasee this school across the GītāRāmānuja
The steady, unmoving body is named almost in one breath with the stilled, fearless mind fixed on the Lord alone.
Bodily stillness placed directly in service of meditation on Krishna.
Viśiṣṭādvaita, in their fuller words

Ramanuja names the outer posture and the inner aim in almost the same breath: body, head, and neck held even and unmoving, the mind utterly stilled and fearless, thought fixed on the Lord alone. The nose-tip gaze is not treated as a separate technical puzzle; it is the near, steady point that helps the meditator's whole attention come to rest on Krishna.

Rāmānuja
Dvaitasee this school across the GītāMadhva
The extant comment here is too thin to state a distinct Dvaita reading of the posture itself; only a marked extension from his broader teaching is offered.
Honest gap: full remark is given at 6.12 and addresses samadhi generally, not this verse's specifics.
Dvaita, in their fuller words

Madhva's extant comment on this exact verse is thin to the point of absence: his surviving remark, given at 6.12 for the whole 6.12-6.14 unit, only glosses joining oneself to the yoga of samadhi, without addressing the specific posture or gaze. On a Dvaita-consistent extension, not his recorded word, the steadiness described here would be read as a discipline the dependent soul takes up only by the Lord's sanction.

Madhva
Kashmir Śaivasee this school across the GītāAbhinavagupta
Only one preserved line reaches this verse directly: fixing the gaze at the nose-tip means not glancing around, set inside a wider account of how steady posture steadies time and, through time, steadies the mind.
Honest limit: the fragment folds 6.10-6.15 together; a fuller reading here is flagged as extension, not recorded word.
BhaktiŚrīdhara
The half-closed eye is explained by its double danger, sleep from closed eyes, distraction from open ones, and the sentence's grammar reaches into the next verse's account of the meditator's inner state.
Precise technical unpacking of the posture and gaze themselves.
Bhakti, in their fuller words

Sridhara gives the fullest technical unpacking of the verse's own words: 'kaya' as specifically the trunk, 'even' and 'steady' as sustained firmness, and the half-closed eye explained by its double danger, closed eyes toward sleep, open eyes toward objects. He notes the sentence's grammar carries forward into the next verse's description of the meditator's inner state.

Śrīdhara
Modern voices teachers of the last two centuries, read together; they stand apart from the classical schools
A modern readingMadhusūdana
Steady practice of the straight line removes the body's shaking, itself a symptom of a wandering mind, so bodily and mental steadiness form one discipline.
A practical, cause-and-effect account accessible without prior doctrine.
A modern reading, in their fuller words

Madhusudana reads the verse as continuous with the seat just described, and pushes the posture instruction toward a claim about cause and effect: steady practice of this one line removes the body's shaking, itself a symptom of a wandering mind, so firmness of body and firmness of effort are shown to be two sides of a single discipline rather than separate requirements.

Madhusūdana
Sit with these

A few questions to carry

These ask for understanding, not recall; each answer is settled by the commentary itself.

1
What three things does the verse say to hold even, unmoving, and steady?
2
According to Sridhara, what does the word 'kaya' specifically mean in this verse?
3
Is 'gazing at the tip of the nose' meant as literal staring, on the shared reading?
4
What two failures does the half-open, half-shut eye avoid, according to the shared reading?
5
If your mind wanders while you meditate, what does this verse suggest checking first?
For a second sitting7 more questions
6
Why does Shankara insist on supplying the phrase 'as it were' before the nose-tip gaze?
7
How does Ramanuja connect the outer posture to the inner aim in his comment on this verse?
8
What is true about Madhva's commentary specifically on verse 6.13?
9
What does the one preserved line from Abhinavagupta's commentary actually say about the gaze?
10
According to Madhusudana, what does steady practice of this straight-line posture bring about?
11
Why do several commentators say the verse's sentence is 'grammatically incomplete' on its own?
12
What is the honest thing to say when a published source for an acarya is thin or fragmentary for a given verse?

Carry this with youwhat stays

Sit for a moment and simply notice your spine, your head, and your neck: are they in one line, or has your body already begun to lean, slump, or tip toward one side without your permission? Straighten gently, without strain, and let your eyes come to rest, not staring at anything, not scanning the room, just softly settled. Notice how much of your mind's restlessness was, until now, being fed by a restless body.

So hold your body as still as you can, without straining against it, and let your eyes come quietly to rest; what settles in the body will, in its own time, settle in the mind as well.

समं कायशिरोग्रीवं धारयन्नचलं स्थिरः।samaṃ kāya-śiro-grīvaṃ dhārayann acalaṃ sthiraḥ

Read deeper

Everything a full study holds, folded below.

Word by word13 terms
samamstraightkāyabodyśhiraḥheadgrīvamneckdhārayanholdingachalamunmovingsthiraḥstillsamprekṣhyagazingnāsika-agramat the tip of the nosesvamowndiśhaḥdirectionschaandanavalokayannot looking
All the commentary, woven togetherevery voice, in one place

The commentary, woven together

machine-assisted draft, pending review

Convergence

he verse gives the bodily posture for meditation: hold the trunk, the head, and the neck even and erect, unmoving and steady. 'Kaya' names specifically the trunk, the middle portion, since head and neck are called out on their own; the line to be kept straight runs from the base of the spine to the crown. The aim is a posture so settled that the body stops calling attention to itself.

Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

'Unmoving' is added deliberately, because a body can be held even and still sway or tremble; the stillness demanded goes further than outward evenness. The body is meant to become as fixed as a statue, so firm that the senses stop being pulled toward outside objects, and 'steady' names a sustained, effortful firmness rather than a momentary stillness.

Śaṅkarācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Gazing at the tip of one's own nose is not to be taken as literal staring. The shared reading draws the eyes inward and half-shuts them: not closed, since that risks sliding toward sleep, and not open to the room, since that risks scattering toward objects. The nose-tip gaze is a means of freeing the eye from outward collection, not an object of attention in its own right.

Śaṅkarācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

The closing instruction against looking about at the directions works together with the settled gaze: one guards against the dullness of closed eyes, the other against the distraction of wandering ones. Several commentators note that the sentence is grammatically incomplete on its own, carrying forward into the description of the meditator's inner state in the verse that follows.

Śaṅkarācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Rāmānujācārya

However the schools differ on where the settled gaze finally comes to rest, all treat the outer stillness as inseparable from an inner aim: the body is disciplined so that something beyond the body, whether the Self or the Lord held in thought, can be reached without the interference of a restless frame.

Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Divergence

Advaita Vedānta

Shankara reads the posture wholly as a support for composing the mind on the Self, insisting on supplying the word 'as it were' before the nose-tip gaze: actual staring at the nose is not enjoined, only the directing of the eyes inward, since the Self, not the nose, is where the mind is finally to be settled, as a later verse in this chapter will state outright.

Śaṅkarācārya

Viśiṣṭādvaita

Ramanuja names the outer posture and the inner aim in almost the same breath: body, head, and neck held even and unmoving, the mind utterly stilled and fearless, thought fixed on the Lord alone. The nose-tip gaze is not treated as a separate technical puzzle; it is the near, steady point that helps the meditator's whole attention come to rest on Krishna.

Rāmānujācārya

Dvaita

Madhva's extant comment on this exact verse is thin to the point of absence: his surviving remark, given at 6.12 for the whole 6.12-6.14 unit, only glosses joining oneself to the yoga of samadhi, without addressing the specific posture or gaze. On a Dvaita-consistent extension, not his recorded word, the steadiness described here would be read as a discipline the dependent soul takes up only by the Lord's sanction.

Madhvācārya

Kashmir Śaiva

Abhinavagupta's surviving comment folds 6.13 into a wider passage on verses 6.10-6.15, but does preserve one direct line: fixing the gaze at the nose-tip so as not to glance around. His larger frame reads the steadying of posture, time, and mind as one continuous chain, aimed at holding the Lord as the highest and, at its furthest reach, attaining Him.

Ācārya Abhinavagupta

Bhakti

Sridhara gives the fullest technical unpacking of the verse's own words: 'kaya' as specifically the trunk, 'even' and 'steady' as sustained firmness, and the half-closed eye explained by its double danger, closed eyes toward sleep, open eyes toward objects. He notes the sentence's grammar carries forward into the next verse's description of the meditator's inner state.

Śrīdhara Svāmī

Modern

Madhusudana reads the verse as continuous with the seat just described, and pushes the posture instruction toward a claim about cause and effect: steady practice of this one line removes the body's shaking, itself a symptom of a wandering mind, so firmness of body and firmness of effort are shown to be two sides of a single discipline rather than separate requirements.

Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

A Seeker Asks

Why does a verse about spiritual practice spend so much attention on something as mechanical as how to hold my spine and where to point my eyes?

Because the body and the mind are not separate projects here. A body left to sway, slump, or fidget keeps handing the mind new things to attend to; a body held even and steady stops generating that noise, and only then does the deeper work of steadying the mind become possible at all.

Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

The gaze instruction is not really about the nose. It exists to solve a precise problem: shut eyes tend to slide toward sleep, wide-open eyes tend to scatter toward whatever catches them. The half-open, inward-drawn gaze is simply the narrow path between those two common failures.

Śaṅkarācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī

And the posture is never the destination. It is named so carefully precisely because it is meant to disappear from notice once it is doing its job, freeing your whole attention for what the following verses describe: a mind finally settled, whether on the Self or on the Lord held in thought.

Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya

Contemplation

Sit for a moment and simply notice your spine, your head, and your neck: are they in one line, or has your body already begun to lean, slump, or tip toward one side without your permission? Straighten gently, without strain, and let your eyes come to rest, not staring at anything, not scanning the room, just softly settled. Notice how much of your mind's restlessness was, until now, being fed by a restless body.

Sit with this · sonnet-5-authored

All the translations and commentary7 translations
Translationsthe verse re-voiced; tap a translator
The commentatorsthe schools expound the verse

Pull up a chair.

You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, open a tradition in the doorways below, or add a voice by name above.

Also hear this verse, tradition by tradition.

Where this teaching echoesin the Haripath