StudyVedanta
Skip to the verse
V.710.610.8
Read slowly

Knowing his glory and his power truly, as one, is what makes a seeker unshakable.

Before the catalogue of glories begins, Krishna names what it is for. Whoever knows this display and this power as they really are, and not merely as words agreed to, is joined to a yoga that no longer trembles.

7Chapter 10
The verseSpoken by Krishna
Voices6 commentators · 5 schools · modern voices
The readingAbout 5 minutes, unhurried
एतां विभूतिं योगं च मम यो वेत्ति तत्त्वतः। सोऽविकम्पेन योगेन युज्यते नात्र संशयः
etāṁ vibhūtiṁ yogaṁ cha mama yo vetti tattvataḥ so ’vikampena yogena yujyate nātra sanśhayaḥ

Whoever truly knows this glory of mine and this power of mine becomes joined to a yoga that does not waver. There is no doubt about this.

Bhagavad Gita 10.7
0:00 / 0:00

Saved for this reading session

Three movements · tap a label to switch

Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda

Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur

The reading read whole, as one unhurried piece

Where it stands

Krishna has just begun to unfold his vibhuti, the great seers and the many forms in which his lordship reaches the world. Before the catalogue grows any longer, he pauses here to say what all of this is for.

The teaching

Know this glory, and the power behind it, truly, as one thing, and the wavering stops.

Two things are to be known, and known as one, not two. There is the glory, the manifold display through which the Lord appears as the great seers, the forms of nature, and everything besides. And there is the yoga, the power by which that display is fashioned and held together. Knowing the display without the power behind it, or affirming the power while the display in front of you stays unexamined, both fall short of what this verse asks. What is asked is the single recognition that everything you meet depends, in just this way, on him. And it must be known truly, tattvatah, not merely agreed to as a form of words you have grown used to repeating. Words held at arm's length still leave a person wavering; what steadies is knowledge that has stopped being a sentence and become, for you, simply how things are. When that happens, Krishna says, you are joined to a yoga that does not tremble. And of this there is no doubt whatsoever, he adds, in his own voice, closing off every reservation a hearer might still be carrying.

The doubt that rises

If I already accept, in principle, that everything depends on God, why does that acceptance so often leave me exactly as unsteady as before, and what, short of another idea to agree with, would actually close that gap?

Where the paths divide

Advaita Vedanta

Read as the steadiness of right vision ripening toward non-dual seeing.

The unwavering yoga you reach here is the firmness of true seeing, settling at last into the one non-dual reality. The Lord's glory, shown through his many powers, becomes a door rather than a resting place: knowing him truly as he appears carries you on toward knowing the single reality his appearances disclose. What remains, at the end of this road, is not a bond kept up between two parties but a settled, doubt-free seeing that there was only ever one.

Vishishtadvaita

Read as devotion ripening toward a Lord who remains distinct from you.

The unwavering yoga here is devotion that has stopped trembling. His glory is his lordship, the ground of everything's coming to be, standing, and acting; his yoga is his own host of beautiful, auspicious qualities. Knowing his greatness and his loveliness together is exactly what makes devotion grow firm. What you are left with is not dissolution into him but steady, unshaken love for a Lord who stays, throughout, someone other than you.

Dvaita

Read honestly: the source is silent here, and only a labeled extension can be offered.

No comment from Madhva survives on this particular verse, and nothing should be presented here as his own confident word. What can honestly be offered is an extension of principles attested elsewhere in his tradition: total dependence, in existence, action, knowledge, and power, on the Lord alone. On that conditional reading, truly knowing the glory would mean recognizing your own complete reliance on him, not an equal's admiration, but this stays a plausible extension, not Madhva's attested reading of 10.7 itself.

Kashmir Shaivism

Read as an extension of the 10.6 passage, flagged clearly as extension.

Abhinavagupta's surviving comment treats 10.6 through 10.11 together at 10.6, not verse by verse. What that passage says is that the great seers pass an expanding awareness among themselves and, through that exchange, recognize themselves as one with the Lord, each reaching with ease the all-pervading nature already his own. Extended to this verse, and marked plainly as extension rather than his recorded word, true knowing here would be an act of recognition, pratyabhijna, of a power the knower already carries, and the unwavering yoga would be consciousness settling once that recognition stops flickering.

Bhakti

Read as the hinge where doctrine opens into devotion.

The glory named since verse five and the Lord's power taught across the chapters before this one are, on this reading, one composite object of knowledge, not two. Knowing both together, and not either alone, is what yields the unshaken vision. This verse is read architecturally as well as devotionally: it is the hinge between the doctrinal teaching just given and the intimate declarations of love Krishna is about to speak in the verses immediately following.

Modern

Read as a settled cognitive change, testable rather than merely asserted.

Read for today, the insistence that this is an absorption of firm, right knowledge, not a passing mood, suggests the steadiness promised here is a real change in how a person knows, one that no longer needs circumstance to hold it up. The closing assurance of no doubt becomes, on this reading, less a demand for blind faith and more an invitation to notice, honestly, whether your own knowing has actually gone that deep yet.

All six readings agree that true knowing, not mere agreement, is what steadies. They part on what that steadiness finally is, and two of the six, Madhva and Abhinavagupta, leave this verse with only thin or borrowed ground to stand on rather than a full reading in their own voice. This page does not force those two into a confidence the sources do not support, and it does not resolve whether the final steadiness is non-dual seeing, standing devotion, or self-recognition.

A question to carry

When you set down the idea you already agree with and actually look, today, at one thing you meet, what would it take for that looking to become the kind of knowing this verse is asking for?

So let your looking, today, go one step further than agreement. Rest it a moment longer on whatever is in front of you, until what depends on what stops being a sentence and starts being, for you, simply so.

Each school is voiced from the commentators named above. Their full words, every translation, and where the schools agree and differ wait in the reading desk just below. Open the commentary desk.

Krishna has been unfolding his vibhuti since the chapter opened; this verse is the hinge that names the fruit of knowing it, before the devotional turn of the verses that follow.

Where they agreethe convergence

Hold the display and the power that makes it as one single fact, known truly rather than merely believed, and the steadiness this verse promises follows; on this the readings agree, though what that steadiness finally is remains contested.

Across schools and centuries the commentators come to the same ground. These are the points they share, and the voices that hold each one.

3schools

Krishna names the fruit before the glories are even counted: true knowing, not mere agreement, is what steadies a seeker.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and 2 others’ words

This verse names the reward of knowing what the chapter has begun to display. Krishna has been speaking of his vibhuti, his glory or manifold extent, and of his yoga, the power behind that extent. Now he states plainly that whoever knows these two truly, tattvatah, as they really are and not merely as words, gains something real: an unwavering steadiness. The commentators treat the verse as a hinge, a transition stanza that announces a fruit and prepares the reader for the catalogue of glories that follows.

3schools

The display and the power behind it must be held as one composite fact, not admired or affirmed separately.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja · Śrīdhara
In Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and 1 others’ words

Two things must be known as one, not separately: the vibhuti, the Lord's manifold display through many forms and beings, and the yoga, the power by which that display is fashioned and held together. Half of this knowing steadies no one. Knowing how the whole world depends on the Lord, and knowing the power by which it so depends, is treated across the readings as a single act of knowledge rather than two.

Asked in question 1, below
2schools

The steadiness is sealed by Krishna's own certainty, leaving no doubt for the one who has truly come to know.

Across Advaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Madhusūdana · Śrīdhara
In Śaṅkara, Madhusūdana, and 1 others’ words

The fruit is called avikampena yogena, an unwavering, untrembling yoga. Krishna seals the promise with his own certainty: there is no doubt in this matter. Several readings stress that since this is the Lord's own word, hesitation has nothing left to stand on; the phrase functions to deepen earnestness rather than to argue a point that could genuinely be doubted.

Asked in question 3, below
3schools

Where the sources are thin, as with Madhva and Abhinavagupta on this verse, honesty about that silence matters more than a confident-sounding invention.

Across Viśiṣṭādvaita, Bhakti, AdvaitaRāmānuja · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Rāmānuja, Śrīdhara, and 1 others’ words

Right knowledge is read as door and ripener together, not as information banked for a separate, later reward. Contemplating the glories in truth is itself what grows into firm union; the knowing and the steadying are one continuous movement rather than a cause followed, sometime later, by its effect.

1school

The knowing is door and ripener together: dwelling on the truth of the glory is itself what grows into firm union.

Across AdvaitaŚaṅkara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara and Madhusūdana’s words

The word tattvatah, truly, carries real weight across the readings. It marks the line between merely assenting to an idea and actually knowing it as fact. Agreement that stays at the level of words is exactly what still leaves a person wavering; the promised steadiness belongs only to knowledge that has become, in this stronger sense, true.

Asked in question 2, below

This is the shared ground; it can be carried as it is. Below is where they differ.

Where they differthe divergence

The question they answer differently
When true knowing of the Lord's glory and power makes a seeker unshakable, is that steadiness the settling of non-dual vision, devotion toward a Lord who stays distinct, an act of self-recognition, or something else again, and how thin is the ground for answering this from Madhva and Abhinavagupta specifically?
The traditional commentators
Advaita Vedāntasee this school across the GītāŚaṅkara
The steadiness is right vision itself, ripening toward the settled realization of the one non-dual reality.
For the seeker whose glory-knowledge is meant to open onto knowledge beyond all attributes.
Viśiṣṭādvaitasee this school across the GītāRāmānuja
The steadiness is devotion that has stopped trembling, ripened by knowing the Lord's lordship and his host of auspicious qualities.
For the devotee who remains, throughout, distinct from the Lord he loves.
Viśiṣṭādvaita, in their fuller words

Ramanuja reads the unwavering yoga as bhakti that has stopped trembling. Vibhuti names the Lord's lordship as the ground of all things' origin, continuance, and activity; yoga names his own host of auspicious qualities. Knowing his glory and his beauty of qualities is precisely what grows and ripens devotion, so the fruit is firm love directed at a Lord who remains, throughout, distinct from the devotee.

Rāmānuja
Dvaitasee this school across the GītāMadhva
Madhva left no comment on this verse; only a conditional extension of his known dependence-doctrine can be offered here, not his attested word.
Read honestly, this fork stays open rather than resolved in Madhva's own voice.
Dvaita, in their fuller words

Madhva is recorded as offering no comment on this verse; nothing in his own voice can honestly be reported here. What the wider Dvaita-adjacent tradition around him stresses, in a later voice, is total dependence: every being's existence, action, knowledge, and power rests on the Lord alone, and knowledge of the Lord in this dependent light is what produces and increases devotion. Extending this to 10.7 as a conditional reading, knowing the glory 'truly' would mean recognizing one's own total reliance on Hari rather than an equal's admiration of him, though this extension is not Madhva's own attested word on the verse.

Madhva
Śuddhādvaitasee this school across the GītāŚrīdhara
Glory and power form one composite object; knowing both together yields the unshaken vision that opens onto devotion.
Voiced here through Sridhara's architecture of the chapter rather than a dedicated Shuddhadvaita source.
BhaktiŚrīdhara
The glory of the earlier verses and the Lord's power form one hinge into the devotional verses that follow; knowing them together steadies the heart for what comes next.
For the devotee standing at the threshold between doctrine and Krishna's declarations of love.
Bhakti, in their fuller words

Sridhara holds that the glory named from verse five onward and the Lord's yoga taught across chapters seven through nine form one composite object of knowledge, not two. Knowing both together, and not either alone, yields the unshaken right vision. He marks the verse architecturally as the hinge between the doctrinal first half of the chapter and the devotional interlude of verses eight through eleven that follows directly after it.

Śrīdhara
Modern voices teachers of the last two centuries, read together; they stand apart from the classical schools
A modern readingMadhusūdana
The promised steadiness is a settled cognitive change rather than a mood, testable by how thoroughly the knowing has actually become true rather than merely assented to.
For the practitioner asking what distinguishes real conviction from borrowed belief.
A modern reading, in their fuller words

Read for a contemporary hearer, Madhusudana's insistence that this is an absorption marked by firm, right knowledge rather than a passing insight suggests that the steadiness promised here is not a mood but a settled cognitive change, one that does not fluctuate with circumstance because it no longer rests on circumstance. The closing assurance of no doubt is, on this reading, less a claim demanding blind faith than an invitation to test the promise by how thoroughly the knowing has actually been made true.

Madhusūdana
Sit with these

A few questions to carry

These ask for understanding, not recall; each answer is settled by the commentary itself.

1
What two things does the verse say must be known together for the promised steadiness to arise?
2
What does the word tattvatah, truly, mark in this verse?
3
How does the verse itself remove doubt about whether the promised steadiness will actually come?
4
You already believe everything depends on God, yet you still feel unsteady. What does this verse's logic suggest is missing?
5
What is the most honest way to present Madhva's and Abhinavagupta's positions on this particular verse?
For a second sitting7 more questions
6
For Shankara, what is the unwavering yoga finally identified with?
7
How does Ramanuja's reading of yoga in this verse differ from an abstract cosmic power?
8
What does the published record actually show about Madhva's comment on this verse?
9
Where does Abhinavagupta's surviving commentary actually place its comment on this stretch of verses?
10
What architectural role does Sridhara give this verse within the chapter?
11
How does Madhusudana characterize the kind of joining named in this verse?
12
Across the readings, is right knowledge of the Lord's glory treated as a reward banked for later, or as something else?

Carry this with youwhat stays

Take a single form you meet today, however ordinary, and hold it a moment longer than usual. Ask, quietly, what it depends on to be here at all. Let the looking go past the words you already know and into something closer to fact. This is not a technique for a special hour; it is the whole practice the verse asks for, applied to whatever is in front of you.

So look again today at whatever is in front of you, and let your looking go past the words you already hold, until what depends on what becomes, for you, simply true.

एतां विभूतिं योगं च मम यो वेत्ति तत्त्वतः।etāṁ vibhūtiṁ yogaṁ cha mama yo vetti tattvataḥ

Read deeper

Everything a full study holds, folded below.

Word by word15 terms
etāmthesevibhūtimgloriesyogamdivine powerschaandmamamyyaḥthose whovettiknowtattvataḥin truthsaḥtheyavikalpenaunwaveringyogenain bhakti yogyujyatebecomes unitednaneveratraheresanśhayaḥdoubt
All the commentary, woven togetherevery voice, in one place

The commentary, woven together

machine-assisted draft, pending review

Convergence

his verse names the reward of knowing what the chapter has begun to display. Krishna has been speaking of his vibhuti, his glory or manifold extent, and of his yoga, the power behind that extent. Now he states plainly that whoever knows these two truly, tattvatah, as they really are and not merely as words, gains something real: an unwavering steadiness. The commentators treat the verse as a hinge, a transition stanza that announces a fruit and prepares the reader for the catalogue of glories that follows.

Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Two things must be known as one, not separately: the vibhuti, the Lord's manifold display through many forms and beings, and the yoga, the power by which that display is fashioned and held together. Half of this knowing steadies no one. Knowing how the whole world depends on the Lord, and knowing the power by which it so depends, is treated across the readings as a single act of knowledge rather than two.

Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī

The fruit is called avikampena yogena, an unwavering, untrembling yoga. Krishna seals the promise with his own certainty: there is no doubt in this matter. Several readings stress that since this is the Lord's own word, hesitation has nothing left to stand on; the phrase functions to deepen earnestness rather than to argue a point that could genuinely be doubted.

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrīdhara Svāmī

Right knowledge is read as door and ripener together, not as information banked for a separate, later reward. Contemplating the glories in truth is itself what grows into firm union; the knowing and the steadying are one continuous movement rather than a cause followed, sometime later, by its effect.

Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

The word tattvatah, truly, carries real weight across the readings. It marks the line between merely assenting to an idea and actually knowing it as fact. Agreement that stays at the level of words is exactly what still leaves a person wavering; the promised steadiness belongs only to knowledge that has become, in this stronger sense, true.

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Divergence

Advaita Vedānta

Shankara reads the unwavering yoga as samyag-darshana, right seeing that has become steady, the firm realization of the one non-dual reality. The Lord's glory, shown with attributes, functions as a door to knowledge beyond attributes: knowing him truly as he appears in his powers carries the seeker on toward knowing the single reality underlying that appearance. What remains at the end is not a relationship sustained between two parties but a settled, doubt-free seeing.

Śaṅkarācārya

Viśiṣṭādvaita

Ramanuja reads the unwavering yoga as bhakti that has stopped trembling. Vibhuti names the Lord's lordship as the ground of all things' origin, continuance, and activity; yoga names his own host of auspicious qualities. Knowing his glory and his beauty of qualities is precisely what grows and ripens devotion, so the fruit is firm love directed at a Lord who remains, throughout, distinct from the devotee.

Rāmānujācārya

Dvaita

Madhva is recorded as offering no comment on this verse; nothing in his own voice can honestly be reported here. What the wider Dvaita-adjacent tradition around him stresses, in a later voice, is total dependence: every being's existence, action, knowledge, and power rests on the Lord alone, and knowledge of the Lord in this dependent light is what produces and increases devotion. Extending this to 10.7 as a conditional reading, knowing the glory 'truly' would mean recognizing one's own total reliance on Hari rather than an equal's admiration of him, though this extension is not Madhva's own attested word on the verse.

Madhvācārya

Kashmir Śaiva

Abhinavagupta's surviving comment treats 10.6 through 10.11 as one passage, placed at 10.6, rather than commenting on 10.7 on its own. That passage describes the great seers passing an expanding awareness among themselves and, through that exchange, recognizing themselves as one with the Lord, each reaching with ease the all-pervading nature already his own. Extended to 10.7, and flagged clearly as extension rather than his recorded word, this would make true knowing an act of recognition, pratyabhijna, of a power the knower already carries, and the unwavering yoga the settling of consciousness once that recognition ceases to waver.

Ācārya Abhinavagupta

Bhakti

Sridhara holds that the glory named from verse five onward and the Lord's yoga taught across chapters seven through nine form one composite object of knowledge, not two. Knowing both together, and not either alone, yields the unshaken right vision. He marks the verse architecturally as the hinge between the doctrinal first half of the chapter and the devotional interlude of verses eight through eleven that follows directly after it.

Śrīdhara Svāmī

Modern

Read for a contemporary hearer, Madhusudana's insistence that this is an absorption marked by firm, right knowledge rather than a passing insight suggests that the steadiness promised here is not a mood but a settled cognitive change, one that does not fluctuate with circumstance because it no longer rests on circumstance. The closing assurance of no doubt is, on this reading, less a claim demanding blind faith than an invitation to test the promise by how thoroughly the knowing has actually been made true.

Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

A Seeker Asks

I already believe that everything depends on God. Why does that belief still leave me wavering, and what would it take to actually be steadied by it?

The verse does not promise its fruit to belief alone; the operative word is tattvatah, truly, as the thing actually is. What you are describing, holding an idea you accept but that has not steadied you, is exactly the gap between assenting to words and knowing a fact. The steadiness belongs only on the far side of that gap.

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Notice, too, whether you are holding the glory and the power together or only one of them. Admiring the display of the world without holding the power that fashions it, or affirming a distant power without dwelling on how near its display actually is, both fall short of the composite knowing the verse asks for.

Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī

The steadiness is also described as something that grows through the knowing rather than something switched on all at once. If you still waver, this is not proof the promise has failed you; it is a sign the knowing has not yet ripened all the way through. The practice is to keep returning your attention to the same dependence, until it stops being a sentence you hold and becomes a thing you see.

Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Contemplation

Take a single form you meet today, however ordinary, and hold it a moment longer than usual. Ask, quietly, what it depends on to be here at all. Let the looking go past the words you already know and into something closer to fact. This is not a technique for a special hour; it is the whole practice the verse asks for, applied to whatever is in front of you.

Sit with this · sonnet-5-authored

All the translations and commentary7 translations
Translationsthe verse re-voiced; tap a translator
The commentatorsthe schools expound the verse

Pull up a chair.

You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, open a tradition in the doorways below, or add a voice by name above.

Also hear this verse, tradition by tradition.

Where this teaching echoesin the Haripath