StudyVedanta
Skip to the verse
V.610.510.7
Read slowly

Even the founders of knowledge and law are born of Krishna's mind alone.

Krishna names the seven great seers and the Manus, the first teachers and lawgivers from whom every creature in the world descends, and traces every one of them back to a single resolve of his own mind.

6Chapter 10
The verseSpoken by Krishna
Voices6 commentators · 5 schools · modern voices
The readingAbout 5 minutes, unhurried
महर्षयः सप्त पूर्वे चत्वारो मनवस्तथा। मद्भावा मानसा जाता येषां लोक इमाः प्रजाः
maharṣhayaḥ sapta pūrve chatvāro manavas tathā mad-bhāvā mānasā jātā yeṣhāṁ loka imāḥ prajāḥ

The seven great seers, and the four before them, and the Manus too, all share my nature and were born from my mind alone. From them come all the creatures living in this world.

Bhagavad Gita 10.6
0:00 / 0:00

Saved for this reading session

Three movements · tap a label to switch

Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda

Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur

The reading read whole, as one unhurried piece

Where it stands

Krishna has been listing his glories as they appear in the qualities and states of beings: intellect, forgiveness, fear, fearlessness, all traced to him. Now he shifts from qualities to persons, naming the seven great seers of old and the Manus, the founders from whom the whole human order descends.

The teaching

The seers and lawgivers who fathered the world are themselves born of Krishna's mind.

The founders of the world stand named here: the seven great seers, Bhrigu, Marici, Atri, Pulastya, Pulaha, Kratu, and Vasishtha among them; the four still earlier; and the Manus, who give mankind its laws. These are not small figures. The seers begin the lines of sacred knowledge; the Manus set the rules by which life is ordered. And they were born from Krishna's mind alone, not from any womb, arising from a mere resolve rather than ordinary birth. Because they spring directly from that mind, they are counted the best of all creatures. Their state of being conforms to his; their thoughts are turned toward him, and through that very attention they come to hold the knowledge, lordship, and power that were never independently their own. From these founders the whole population of the world descends, in two channels at once: by birth, as sons and grandsons and the generations after, and by teaching, as disciples and their disciples in proper succession. Every class of person traces back through one channel or the other to these founders, and through the founders back to Krishna alone. Even beings of the greatest age, power, and creative reach turn out to be produced, not self-standing. If the very founders of the worlds are his mind-born offspring, nothing remains outside his being the source.

The doubt that rises

These seers and Manus sound like figures out of old myth, and the commentators cannot even agree on exactly who they are. What is here for a reader who does not take the family tree literally?

Where the paths divide

Advaita Vedanta

Read where the exact names are disputed but the underlying doctrine is not.

Shankara counts only the seven seers, Bhrigu and the rest, and the four Savarna Manus. Madhusudana offers this alongside a second count: the seven seers, an earlier four such as Sanaka, and fourteen Manus beginning with Svayambhuva. Both readings converge completely on what matters: all these beings have being fixed in Krishna, born of his mind and not of any womb, and from them the whole creation, moving and unmoving, has descended.

Vishishtadvaita

Read by two distinct cosmic offices, creation and maintenance.

Ramanuja tells the two groups apart by function. The seven seers were born to set the ceaseless work of creation going; the four Savarnika Manus were born to keep that creation standing, remaining, moment by moment until dissolution, the begetters and protectors of their lines. Their state of being is exact: it is nothing other than a mode of Krishna's own being, standing always within his judgment.

Dvaita

Read where 'of my being' must mean causation, not indwelling.

Madhva argues the four Manus must already exist, since present creatures cannot be the offspring of Manus not yet born, which is also why the Tamasa Manu, a descent of the Lord himself, is left out of the count. The deeper point is that 'of my being' names strict causation: born from Krishna alone, since he is the inner controller even of Brahma, whose mind is only the visible doorway through which these founders appear.

Kashmir Shaivism

Read from a fragmentary source, kept close to what it actually states.

What survives of Abhinavagupta's comment here is brief. It says that the great seers pass an expanding awareness back and forth by teaching one another, so that all knowers alike are, in that passing-across, one and the same Lord, each reaching with ease the all-pervading nature already his own. A fuller reading of the whole genealogy as one awareness spreading through many knowers would go beyond the fragment itself, and is held here only as a flagged possibility, not as confirmed doctrine.

Bhakti

Read through the image of one tree spreading outward.

Sridhara pictures Krishna as the trunk of a single tree. The great seers are its boughs, and every later twig of human society, families and lines of disciples alike, descends from them in unbroken order. The whole visible multiplicity of the world, on this reading, is nothing but that one tree spreading.

Modern

Read as a case study in how disputed detail can sit beside settled doctrine.

Madhusudana's own willingness to offer two different counts of who exactly is named, without treating the disagreement as a threat to the verse, models a useful posture: let the historical or genealogical detail stay open where the sources genuinely differ, while holding firmly to what every count agrees on, that nothing here stands independent of Krishna's mind.

The schools genuinely disagree on who these figures are and on what 'of my being' means. Advaita itself offers two different counts of the group. Dvaita reads their being-from-Krishna as strict causation, while Vishishtadvaita and Advaita lean toward their being resting within his own. The Kashmir Shaiva source is thin, and any fuller reading of it stays a flagged extrapolation rather than settled doctrine. This page does not resolve these differences, and does not need to.

A question to carry

If you cannot say with certainty who these ancient founders were, can you still trace the line of your own knowledge and your own life back to a single source?

Picture the tree: one germ, a stem, branches, twigs, leaves, fruit, and all of it, however vast, nothing but that one germ spreading outward. Let your eye travel back along whatever lineage produced you, and rest there, in the source all of it came from.

Each school is voiced from the commentators named above. Their full words, every translation, and where the schools agree and differ wait in the reading desk just below. Open the commentary desk.

Having just traced the inner qualities and states of beings to himself, Krishna now turns from qualities to persons, naming the very founders of the human order, so that the supremacy he has been declaring stands proven in the lineage of creation itself.

Where they agreethe convergence

However the seven seers, the earlier four, and the Manus are counted, they are mind-born from Krishna alone, and from them the whole world descends.

Across schools and centuries the commentators come to the same ground. These are the points they share, and the voices that hold each one.

4schools

Krishna names the great founders of knowledge and law, the seven seers and the Manus, and traces every one of them back to himself.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Dvaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja · Madhva · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and 3 others’ words

Krishna names the cosmic founders of the human order and traces every one of them back to himself: the seven great seers of old, such as Bhrigu, Marici, Atri, Pulastya, Pulaha, Kratu, and Vasishtha; the four earlier ones; and the Manus, the lawgivers of mankind. These are not minor figures. The seers found the lines of sacred knowledge, and the Manus frame the laws by which human life is ordered.

4schools

None of them was born from a womb; a single resolve of his mind brought them forth, and this pure origin marks them as the best of all creatures.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Dvaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja · Madhva · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and 3 others’ words

Every commentator agrees these great beings were born from Krishna's mind alone, not from any womb. Their birth is described as arising from a mere resolve, a willing, and this pure origin is what marks them as the best of all creatures, set apart from ordinary mortals from the very moment of their appearing.

Asked in question 1, below
3schools

Their being conforms to his; their thoughts are fixed on him, and through that attention their knowledge and lordship come to light, held rather than owned.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, DvaitaŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja · Madhva · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and 2 others’ words

To be of Krishna's own being, mad-bhava, means their existence conforms to his and stands under his judgment; their thoughts are fixed on him, and through that very attention their knowledge, lordship, and power come to light. None of it is a possession they hold independently of him.

3schools

From them the whole world descends, by birth and by teaching alike, so that every lineage of blood or wisdom finally traces back to Krishna.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and 2 others’ words

From these seers and Manus the whole population of the world has descended, and this descent runs in two channels at once: by ordinary birth, as sons and grandsons and the generations after, and by the transmission of knowledge, as disciples and the disciples of disciples in due succession. Every class of people traces back, through one channel or the other, to these founders.

Asked in question 2, below
2schools

If even the founders of the worlds are his mind-born offspring, no exception remains anywhere in creation to his being the one source.

Across Advaita, DvaitaŚaṅkara · Madhva · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Madhva, and 1 others’ words

The deeper point of naming such powerful, original beings is to prove Krishna's supremacy from the top down. If even the founders of knowledge and law, the most exalted beings imaginable, are themselves derived from Krishna's mind, then nothing at all stands as an independent source alongside him.

Asked in question 3, below

This is the shared ground; it can be carried as it is. Below is where they differ.

Where they differthe divergence

The question they answer differently
When Krishna says these founders are 'of my being,' does that mean their existence conforms to his will, that they are strictly caused by him alone, or that they share directly in one and the same awareness?
The traditional commentators
Advaita Vedāntasee this school across the GītāŚaṅkara, Madhusūdana
However the seven seers and the four are counted, all these founders have being fixed in Krishna, mind-born rather than womb-born, and from them the whole world descends.
Across two differing counts of who exactly is named.
Viśiṣṭādvaitasee this school across the GītāRāmānuja
The seers were born to set creation going and the Manus to keep it standing; both remain, moment by moment, within Krishna's judgment and conforming to his will.
Read as two distinct cosmic offices, not a single undivided role.
Viśiṣṭādvaita, in their fuller words

Ramanuja distinguishes two cosmic offices rather than disputing names: the seven seers were born to set creation going, the four Manus to keep it standing once begun, and both continue, moment by moment until dissolution, to father and protect their lines. Their state of being is exact conformity to Krishna's own will, standing always within his judgment.

Rāmānuja
Dvaitasee this school across the GītāMadhva
Being-from-Krishna is read as plain causation, born from him alone, since he is the inner controller even of Brahma, whose mind is only the visible doorway.
The four Manus must already exist, since present creatures cannot descend from Manus not yet born.
Dvaita, in their fuller words

Madhva insists the four Manus must already exist, since present creatures cannot be the offspring of Manus not yet born, and reads mad-bhava not as dwelling within Krishna but as strict causation: born from Krishna alone, since Krishna is the inner controller even of Brahma. Brahma's mind is only the visible doorway; Krishna is the sole and final source.

Madhva
Śuddhādvaitasee this school across the GītāŚrīdhara
The seers and Manus are held to be no products of ordinary matter but Krishna's own radiant power, assumed for his play, declaring his own beginninglessness.
Read as a continuation of the earlier claim that Krishna is the source of the gods.
BhaktiŚrīdhara
Krishna is the one trunk, the seers its spreading boughs, and every family and line of disciples in human society its later twigs, all one tree.
Read through the image of a single germ spreading into the whole visible tree.
Bhakti, in their fuller words

Sridhara is glad to picture Krishna as the trunk of a single tree, the great seers as its boughs, and every later twig of human society, families and lines of disciples alike, as descending from them in unbroken order. The whole spreading multiplicity of the world is, on this reading, nothing but the one tree of Krishna's being.

Śrīdhara
Modern voices teachers of the last two centuries, read together; they stand apart from the classical schools
A modern readingMadhusūdana
Whichever way the seven, the four, and the Manus are counted, no reading disputes that nothing among them stands independent of Krishna's mind.
Read as a case study in how disputed detail can coexist with settled doctrine.
A modern reading, in their fuller words

Madhusudana's own second count, three groups rather than two, is his most distinctive move here: seven seers, an earlier four, and fourteen Manus, all reconciled by the shared claim that whichever way the names are counted, what is secured without exception is that nothing here is independent of Krishna's mind.

Madhusūdana
Sit with these

A few questions to carry

These ask for understanding, not recall; each answer is settled by the commentary itself.

1
According to the verse, how were the seven great seers and the Manus born?
2
What does the verse say has descended from these seers and Manus?
3
Why does Krishna bother naming such powerful, ancient founders in a chapter about his own glory?
4
The commentators disagree on the exact identity of the seers and the four Manus. What survives that disagreement?
5
The verse says the world descends from these founders 'by birth and by knowledge.' What does this suggest for someone who has learned wisdom from a teacher?
6
What single feature of their birth is said to make these founders 'the best of all creatures'?
For a second sitting6 more questions
7
For Ramanuja, what distinct offices do the seven seers and the four Manus each carry?
8
How does Madhva read the phrase 'of my being' (mad-bhava) applied to these founders?
9
Why does Madhva exclude the Tamasa Manu from this count of founders?
10
What does the surviving Abhinavagupta fragment on this verse actually claim?
11
How does Sridhara picture the relation between Krishna, the seers, and human society?
12
Madhusudana gives two different counts of who is named in this verse. What does this variation show about how to read the verse?

Carry this with youwhat stays

Picture a single germ giving rise to a stem, the stem to branches, the branches to twigs and leaves and fruit, so that the whole tree, however vast it grows, is nothing but that one germ spreading outward. Let your eye travel back along whatever lineage produced you, whether of blood or of teaching, until it rests on the single source all of it came from.

Trace the lineage that made you, whatever thread you follow, and let it lead you back to the one mind from which it all first arose.

मनसा जाता येषां लोक इमाः प्रजाः।manasā jātā yeṣhāṁ loka imāḥ prajāḥ

Read deeper

Everything a full study holds, folded below.

Word by word13 terms
mahā-ṛiṣhayaḥthe great SagessaptasevenpūrvebeforechatvāraḥfourmanavaḥManustathāalsomat bhāvāḥare born from memānasāḥmindjātāḥbornyeṣhāmfrom themlokein the worldimāḥall theseprajāḥpeople
All the commentary, woven togetherevery voice, in one place

The commentary, woven together

machine-assisted draft, pending review

Convergence

rishna names the cosmic founders of the human order and traces every one of them back to himself: the seven great seers of old, such as Bhrigu, Marici, Atri, Pulastya, Pulaha, Kratu, and Vasishtha; the four earlier ones; and the Manus, the lawgivers of mankind. These are not minor figures. The seers found the lines of sacred knowledge, and the Manus frame the laws by which human life is ordered.

Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Madhvācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Every commentator agrees these great beings were born from Krishna's mind alone, not from any womb. Their birth is described as arising from a mere resolve, a willing, and this pure origin is what marks them as the best of all creatures, set apart from ordinary mortals from the very moment of their appearing.

Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Madhvācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

To be of Krishna's own being, mad-bhava, means their existence conforms to his and stands under his judgment; their thoughts are fixed on him, and through that very attention their knowledge, lordship, and power come to light. None of it is a possession they hold independently of him.

Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Madhvācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

From these seers and Manus the whole population of the world has descended, and this descent runs in two channels at once: by ordinary birth, as sons and grandsons and the generations after, and by the transmission of knowledge, as disciples and the disciples of disciples in due succession. Every class of people traces back, through one channel or the other, to these founders.

Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

The deeper point of naming such powerful, original beings is to prove Krishna's supremacy from the top down. If even the founders of knowledge and law, the most exalted beings imaginable, are themselves derived from Krishna's mind, then nothing at all stands as an independent source alongside him.

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhvācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Divergence

Advaita Vedānta

Shankara reads the group simply as the seven seers, Bhrigu and the rest, and the four Savarna Manus. Madhusudana offers this alongside a second count: the seven seers, an earlier four such as Sanaka, and then fourteen Manus beginning with Svayambhuva. The two counts differ on names, but converge completely on the doctrine: every one of these beings has being fixed in Krishna, mind-born and not womb-born, and from them the whole moving and unmoving creation descends.

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Viśiṣṭādvaita

Ramanuja distinguishes two cosmic offices rather than disputing names: the seven seers were born to set creation going, the four Manus to keep it standing once begun, and both continue, moment by moment until dissolution, to father and protect their lines. Their state of being is exact conformity to Krishna's own will, standing always within his judgment.

Rāmānujācārya

Dvaita

Madhva insists the four Manus must already exist, since present creatures cannot be the offspring of Manus not yet born, and reads mad-bhava not as dwelling within Krishna but as strict causation: born from Krishna alone, since Krishna is the inner controller even of Brahma. Brahma's mind is only the visible doorway; Krishna is the sole and final source.

Madhvācārya

Kashmir Śaiva

The surviving Abhinavagupta fragment on this verse is thin, a single short paragraph. What it does say is that the great seers pass an expanding awareness back and forth by teaching one another, so that all knowers are, in this passing-across, one and the same Lord, each reaching with ease the all-pervading nature already his own. A fuller Kashmir Shaiva reading of the genealogy as one awareness spreading through many knowers would go beyond what the fragment itself states, and is offered here only as a flagged extension, not as Abhinavagupta's confirmed position.

Ācārya Abhinavagupta

Bhakti

Sridhara is glad to picture Krishna as the trunk of a single tree, the great seers as its boughs, and every later twig of human society, families and lines of disciples alike, as descending from them in unbroken order. The whole spreading multiplicity of the world is, on this reading, nothing but the one tree of Krishna's being.

Śrīdhara Svāmī

Modern

Madhusudana's own second count, three groups rather than two, is his most distinctive move here: seven seers, an earlier four, and fourteen Manus, all reconciled by the shared claim that whichever way the names are counted, what is secured without exception is that nothing here is independent of Krishna's mind.

Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

A Seeker Asks

The commentators cannot even agree on who these seers and Manus actually are. If I do not take the genealogy literally, what does this verse offer me?

The disputed names are not the point; the chain back to one source is. Whatever the exact identities, every reading agrees these are the most original and powerful founders imaginable, and every one of them is derived from Krishna's mind rather than self-standing.

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

The argument runs from the top down. Naming beings of this power and antiquity and then tracing them to Krishna is meant to settle, beyond any further question, that his supremacy has no exception, not even at the highest tier of creation.

Madhvācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

The descent is not only of bodies but of knowledge, teacher to disciple as much as parent to child. So if you have received real wisdom through any line of teaching, you already stand inside the lineage this verse describes, traced back to the one source it names.

Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī

Contemplation

Picture a single germ giving rise to a stem, the stem to branches, the branches to twigs and leaves and fruit, so that the whole tree, however vast it grows, is nothing but that one germ spreading outward. Let your eye travel back along whatever lineage produced you, whether of blood or of teaching, until it rests on the single source all of it came from.

Sit with this · sonnet-5-authored

All the translations and commentary7 translations
Translationsthe verse re-voiced; tap a translator
The commentatorsthe schools expound the verse

Pull up a chair.

You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, open a tradition in the doorways below, or add a voice by name above.

Also hear this verse, tradition by tradition.

Where this teaching echoesin the Haripath