StudyVedanta
Skip to the verse
V.251.241.26
Read slowly

Krishna halts the chariot before Bhishma and Drona, and speaks one plain command: look at these Kurus.

This is a narration verse, one sentence of placement and one sentence of speech, and most of the surveyed tradition lets it pass in near silence. Where comment survives at all, it stays close to the surface, or reads the command as a steadying word rather than a provocation.

25Chapter 1
The verseSpoken by Sanjaya
Voices5 commentators · 5 schools · modern voices
The readingAbout 5 minutes, unhurried
भीष्मद्रोणप्रमुखतः सर्वेषां च महीक्षिताम्। उवाच पार्थ पश्यैतान्समवेतान्कुरूनिति
bhīṣhma-droṇa-pramukhataḥ sarveṣhāṁ cha mahī-kṣhitām uvācha pārtha paśhyaitān samavetān kurūn iti

Sanjaya says that Krishna drew the finest chariot to rest directly before Bhishma, Drona, and all the assembled kings, and told Arjuna: Partha, look at these Kurus gathered here.

Bhagavad Gita 1.25
0:00 / 0:00

Saved for this reading session

Three movements · tap a label to switch

Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda

Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur

The reading read whole, as one unhurried piece

Where it stands

Sanjaya is still relaying to the blind king Dhritarashtra what happened when Arjuna asked to be driven out between the two armies. This verse is the moment of arrival: the chariot stops at one exact spot, and Krishna speaks the sentence that will, in the very next verses, undo Arjuna entirely.

The teaching

The chariot comes to rest, and Krishna speaks a single word: look.

Taken on its surface, the verse does one narrow thing: it places the chariot directly before Bhishma, Drona, and all the assembled kings, and it reports Krishna's single sentence, Partha, look at these Kurus gathered here. Where commentary on this exact verse survives at all, it stays close to that surface. Sridhara's surviving line does no more than confirm the placement and the words spoken. Three of the five acaryas surveyed here, Ramanuja, Madhva, and Abhinavagupta, leave no comment isolated to this particular verse: Ramanuja folds it into a passage beginning at 1.20, Madhva's commentary does not begin until chapter two, and Abhinavagupta's source records plainly that he offers no comment on this verse at all, with no range given as an anchor. This reading tries to be honest about that unevenness rather than paper over it with invented confidence. One source does reach further: Madhusudana treats 1.24 and 1.25 as a single passage, and in his comment there he reads Krishna, as the one who already perceives every hidden mind, as sensing Arjuna's forming grief even before it breaks into speech, and choosing this exact placement and this exact word of command to steady his friend rather than leave him to face the sight unprepared, its edge softened by a tenderness that sounds, on the surface, almost like teasing. Whether or not that fuller reading is accepted, what the verse itself does is simple and exact: it sets the stage, and falls silent, trusting what Arjuna is about to see to do the rest of the work.

The doubt that rises

If a verse carries this little weight in the tradition's own eyes, three of five acaryas silent and the rest offering only a name-check or a cross-reference, what is a reader meant to do with it beyond noting that the stage is now set?

Where the paths divide

Advaita Vedanta

Read as an honest absence, since Shankara's extant commentary does not reach chapter one.

No specifically Advaita voice comments on this verse in the sources gathered here. What can be set beside it is only Sridhara's plain identifying gloss, which makes no Advaita doctrinal claim and is recorded here as the nearest available reading, not as a substitute for a missing one.

Vishishtadvaita

Read as a gap folded into a wider passage.

Ramanuja gives no comment specific to this verse, treating it as part of a passage beginning at verse 1.20, where his own comment centers instead on Krishna's promptness in answering Arjuna and his promise of victory before the assembled kings. Whatever he might have said about this particular placement and command is simply not part of the record that survives.

Dvaita

Read as a complete gap in the source material.

Madhva's commentary on the Gita does not begin until verse 2.11. The whole of chapter one, this verse included, passes without a word from him, and nothing here should be read as filling that gap on his behalf.

Kashmir Shaivism

Read as a stated blank, without even the range-anchor given elsewhere.

The source records plainly that Abhinavagupta offers no comment on this verse, and unlike some neighboring verses, no wider passage or anchor point is given either. One could imagine, only as a labeled and conditional extension, Krishna's single word as an act meant to startle a contracted awareness into something wider, but this is not his recorded word.

Bhakti

Read as the one line that survives, and nothing more.

What remains attributed to Sridhara here is brief: before Bhishma, Drona, and all the kings, Krishna said, Partha, look at these Kurus assembled. It confirms the plain sense and ventures no reading of the moment as an act of tenderness beyond that identification.

Modern

Read as a considered act of steadying, reported from a paired comment.

Madhusudana leaves no comment isolated to this verse alone but treats it together with the verse before, where he explains that Krishna, already perceiving Arjuna's forming grief, places the chariot at this exact spot and adds the word of command to reassure him, its tenderness folded into a gentle, kinsman's mockery, rather than to provoke the collapse that is about to follow.

This page does not manufacture positions for the acaryas who left none. What is left open here is left open honestly: some verses carry far less commentarial weight than others, and this is one of them. Whether that thinness means the verse is doctrinally unimportant, or simply a stage direction the tradition trusted to need no gloss, is not decided here.

A question to carry

When a text you are studying has almost nothing written about a particular passage, do you feel the pull to supply the missing depth yourself, and what would it cost you to resist that pull and simply let the moment be set, quietly, before what follows?

Let this crowded, quiet verse do its narrow work, placing the chariot and speaking the word, and let its silences stand as they are, without being dressed up as more than they are.

Each school is voiced from the commentators named above. Their full words, every translation, and where the schools agree and differ wait in the reading desk just below. Open the commentary desk.

Arjuna has twice asked to be driven out between the armies to see who has come to fight; here Sanjaya reports the moment Krishna answers, stopping the chariot at one exact spot and naming what stands there, just before Arjuna's own eyes take in the scene.

Where they agreethe convergence

Krishna brings the chariot to rest at one chosen spot and speaks a single sentence: look at these Kurus gathered here; every surviving comment confirms this much and little more.

Across schools and centuries the commentators come to the same ground. These are the points they share, and the voices that hold each one.

2schools

The chariot comes to rest at one exact place, straight before Bhishma, Drona, and the assembled rulers of the earth.

Across Bhakti, AdvaitaŚrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śrīdhara and Madhusūdana’s words

Krishna brings the chariot to rest at one exact spot: directly before Bhishma, Drona, and all the assembled rulers of the earth. Where any comment survives at all, it treats this placement as deliberate rather than incidental, chosen so that Arjuna faces precisely these figures, bound to him by blood and by learning, and not some other part of the field.

Asked in question 1, below
2schools

Krishna speaks one plain sentence, carried by Sanjaya just as it was said: Partha, look at these Kurus gathered here.

Across Bhakti, AdvaitaŚrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śrīdhara and Madhusūdana’s words

Having placed the chariot, Krishna speaks a single sentence, reported by Sanjaya in Krishna's own words: Partha, look at these Kurus gathered here. Every source that comments at all, however briefly, confirms this plain sense without dispute.

Asked in question 2, below
3schools

Three of the five acaryas surveyed here leave no comment isolated to this verse, and that absence is itself part of the honest record.

Across Viśiṣṭādvaita, Dvaita, Kashmir ŚaivaRāmānuja · Madhva · Abhinavagupta
In Rāmānuja, Madhva, and 1 others’ words

Three of the five acaryas surveyed here, Ramanuja, Madhva, and Abhinavagupta, leave no comment isolated to this particular verse. Ramanuja folds it into his treatment beginning at 1.20, Madhva's commentary does not begin until 2.11, and Abhinavagupta records no comment at all for this verse, with no range given as an anchor either. Their silence here is itself part of the honest record of this verse.

Asked in question 3, below
1school

Where fuller reflection survives, by way of Madhusudana's paired treatment with the verse before, the command is read as meant to steady Arjuna, not unsettle him.

Across AdvaitaMadhusūdana
In Madhusūdana’s words

Where fuller reflection does survive, by way of Madhusudana's paired treatment of 1.24 and 1.25, it reads the command to see as considered rather than incidental: Krishna already perceives Arjuna's forming grief, and the word of command is meant to steady him, not to provoke the collapse that is about to follow.

2schools

This is the hinge where seeing begins, the instant just before Arjuna's own eyes take in what the next two verses will describe.

Across Bhakti, AdvaitaŚrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śrīdhara and Madhusūdana’s words

Even where the surviving comment is thinnest, the verse carries a clear narrative function without needing a doctrinal gloss to carry it: it is the hinge moment where seeing begins, the instant just before Arjuna's own eyes do the work that the next two verses describe.

Asked in question 7, below

This is the shared ground; it can be carried as it is. Below is where they differ.

Where they differthe divergence

The question they answer differently
This verse carries almost no doctrinal fork in the surviving sources; the honest question is not which school reads Krishna's placement and command differently, but how each tradition's silence, or its bare confirmation, should itself be read.
The traditional commentators
Advaita Vedāntasee this school across the GītāŚrīdhara
No acarya of this school's line comments specifically on this verse; only Sridhara's bare identifying gloss survives to stand near it.
Shankara's extant Gita commentary does not extend to chapter one at all.
Asked in question 5, below
Viśiṣṭādvaitasee this school across the GītāRāmānuja
Ramanuja folds this verse into his treatment beginning at 1.20, with nothing isolated to this exact sentence.
The absence is recorded honestly rather than filled with an invented reading.
Viśiṣṭādvaita, in their fuller words

Ramanuja gives no comment isolated to this verse, folding it into a passage beginning at 1.20 where his comment centers on Krishna's promptness and his promise of victory. No distinct Vishishtadvaita reading of the chariot's exact placement or the word Kurus survives in his own words; this entry is recorded as absent rather than supplied from elsewhere.

Rāmānuja
Dvaitasee this school across the GītāMadhva
Madhva's Gita commentary does not begin until 2.11, so chapter one, this verse included, has no comment from him at all.
Any Dvaita-flavored extension offered here is explicitly conditional, not his recorded word.
Dvaita, in their fuller words

Madhva's commentary does not address chapter one at all, beginning only at 2.11. There is no Dvaita reading of this verse in his own words to report; any extension of his general principle that every act unfolds under the Lord's sanction would be speculative and is not offered here as his position.

Madhva
Śuddhādvaitasee this school across the GītāŚrīdhara
Sridhara's surviving line is a bare identification: before Bhishma, Drona, and all the kings, Krishna said, Partha, look at these Kurus assembled.
The one genuinely verse-specific gloss available for this verse in this collection.
BhaktiŚrīdhara
The same bare identifying line is the only material available; it confirms the placement and command without venturing into devotional reading.
No further extension into the moment as an act of tenderness is supplied where the source does not go there itself.
Bhakti, in their fuller words

The one line of Sridhara's that survives here confirms only the plain sense: before Bhishma, Drona, and all the kings, Krishna said, Partha, look at these Kurus assembled. It does not extend into a devotional reading of the moment as an act of the Lord's tenderness, and this entry does not manufacture such an extension on his behalf.

Śrīdhara
Modern voices teachers of the last two centuries, read together; they stand apart from the classical schools
A modern readingMadhusūdana
Madhusudana, reporting from his paired comment at 1.24, reads the command to see as a considered act meant to steady Arjuna, already sensed to be forming grief, rather than provoke him.
Read narratively from the one source that reaches forward to address this verse's content directly.
A modern reading, in their fuller words

Madhusudana leaves no comment isolated to this exact verse but folds it into a paired treatment with 1.24, where he explains that Krishna, already perceiving Arjuna's forming grief, places the chariot at this precise spot and adds the word of command to steady rather than unsettle him, its tenderness folded into a gentle, kinsman's mockery.

Madhusūdana
Asked in question 6, below
Sit with these

A few questions to carry

These ask for understanding, not recall; each answer is settled by the commentary itself.

1
Where does this verse say Krishna brings the chariot to rest?
2
What single sentence does Krishna speak once the chariot is in place?
3
How much verse-specific commentary survives from Ramanuja, Madhva, and Abhinavagupta for this particular verse?
4
When most of the surveyed acaryas leave no comment on a verse, what does this page do with that silence?
5
Why does Shankara's voice not appear among the acaryas for this verse?
6
What passage does Madhusudana fold this verse into, and what does he explain there?
7
What narrative role does this verse play in the larger scene Sanjaya is describing?
For a second sitting5 more questions
8
What passage does Ramanuja fold this verse into?
9
According to Madhusudana's reading, why does Krishna add the word of command to see, rather than simply stopping the chariot in silence?
10
What honest posture does this page take toward a verse this thinly commented, rather than filling the gap with invented confidence?
11
Where does Sridhara's only surviving comment on this verse stop?
12
Why is it acceptable to report Madhusudana's fuller reading here even though his commentary is formally anchored at 1.24, not this verse?

Carry this with youwhat stays

Sit for a moment with a verse that does one small, exact thing: it places a chariot, and it speaks a single word of command. Notice how little the tradition, where it speaks at all, asks you to extract from that. Some verses do their whole work by setting the stage precisely and then falling silent, trusting the moment itself, and what follows from it, to carry the weight.

Let this quiet, exact verse do its narrow work, setting the chariot and speaking the word, and let its silences in the tradition be respected rather than dressed up as more than they are.

Read deeper

Everything a full study holds, folded below.

Word by word13 terms
bhīṣhmaGrandsire BheeshmadroṇaDronacharyapramukhataḥin the presencesarveṣhāmallchaandmahī-kṣhitāmother kingsuvāchasaidpārthaArjun, the son of Prithapaśhyabeholdetānthesesamavetāngatheredkurūndescendants of Kuruitithus
All the commentary, woven togetherevery voice, in one place

The commentary, woven together

machine-assisted draft, pending review

Convergence

rishna brings the chariot to rest at one exact spot: directly before Bhishma, Drona, and all the assembled rulers of the earth. Where any comment survives at all, it treats this placement as deliberate rather than incidental, chosen so that Arjuna faces precisely these figures, bound to him by blood and by learning, and not some other part of the field.

Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Having placed the chariot, Krishna speaks a single sentence, reported by Sanjaya in Krishna's own words: Partha, look at these Kurus gathered here. Every source that comments at all, however briefly, confirms this plain sense without dispute.

Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Three of the five acaryas surveyed here, Ramanuja, Madhva, and Abhinavagupta, leave no comment isolated to this particular verse. Ramanuja folds it into his treatment beginning at 1.20, Madhva's commentary does not begin until 2.11, and Abhinavagupta records no comment at all for this verse, with no range given as an anchor either. Their silence here is itself part of the honest record of this verse.

Rāmānujācārya · Madhvācārya · Ācārya Abhinavagupta

Where fuller reflection does survive, by way of Madhusudana's paired treatment of 1.24 and 1.25, it reads the command to see as considered rather than incidental: Krishna already perceives Arjuna's forming grief, and the word of command is meant to steady him, not to provoke the collapse that is about to follow.

Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Even where the surviving comment is thinnest, the verse carries a clear narrative function without needing a doctrinal gloss to carry it: it is the hinge moment where seeing begins, the instant just before Arjuna's own eyes do the work that the next two verses describe.

Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Divergence

Advaita Vedānta

No Advaita-specific acarya's comment survives for this verse in this collection, since Shankara's extant Gita commentary does not extend to chapter one. What is recorded here under this heading is only Sridhara's plain identifying gloss, read as the nearest surviving voice, which confirms the placement and the command without venturing any Advaita doctrinal claim.

Śrīdhara Svāmī

Viśiṣṭādvaita

Ramanuja gives no comment isolated to this verse, folding it into a passage beginning at 1.20 where his comment centers on Krishna's promptness and his promise of victory. No distinct Vishishtadvaita reading of the chariot's exact placement or the word Kurus survives in his own words; this entry is recorded as absent rather than supplied from elsewhere.

Rāmānujācārya

Dvaita

Madhva's commentary does not address chapter one at all, beginning only at 2.11. There is no Dvaita reading of this verse in his own words to report; any extension of his general principle that every act unfolds under the Lord's sanction would be speculative and is not offered here as his position.

Madhvācārya

Kashmir Śaiva

The source records that Abhinavagupta offers no comment on this verse, with no range or anchor given as it is for some neighboring verses. A conditional Kashmir Shaiva extension might read Krishna's single command as an act meant to startle a contracted awareness toward something wider, but this is a labeled extrapolation, not Abhinavagupta's recorded word.

Ācārya Abhinavagupta

Bhakti

The one line of Sridhara's that survives here confirms only the plain sense: before Bhishma, Drona, and all the kings, Krishna said, Partha, look at these Kurus assembled. It does not extend into a devotional reading of the moment as an act of the Lord's tenderness, and this entry does not manufacture such an extension on his behalf.

Śrīdhara Svāmī

Modern

Madhusudana leaves no comment isolated to this exact verse but folds it into a paired treatment with 1.24, where he explains that Krishna, already perceiving Arjuna's forming grief, places the chariot at this precise spot and adds the word of command to steady rather than unsettle him, its tenderness folded into a gentle, kinsman's mockery.

Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

A Seeker Asks

Three of the five acaryas surveyed here have nothing distinct to say about this verse. What is a seeker supposed to do with a verse this thinly commented?

Take the silence as information rather than a gap to fill. Ramanuja, Madhva, and Abhinavagupta each show, in their own way, that this verse does not carry the weight their fuller comments elsewhere carry; that is itself a form of guidance about where the tradition wants your attention.

Rāmānujācārya · Madhvācārya · Ācārya Abhinavagupta

Where comment survives at all, follow it exactly as far as it goes and no further. Sridhara confirms the placement and the command; Madhusudana, reporting from his paired comment at 1.24, adds that the command is meant to steady Arjuna. Neither claims more for the verse than that.

Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

A narrative verse can still be read honestly for what it is: the hinge where seeing begins. You do not need every verse to be a doctrinal battleground for it to be worth reading with care, and this is one where the tradition itself seems content to let the moment simply happen.

Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Contemplation

Sit for a moment with a verse that does one small, exact thing: it places a chariot, and it speaks a single word of command. Notice how little the tradition, where it speaks at all, asks you to extract from that. Some verses do their whole work by setting the stage precisely and then falling silent, trusting the moment itself, and what follows from it, to carry the weight.

Sit with this · sonnet-5-authored

All the translations and commentary7 translations
Translationsthe verse re-voiced; tap a translator
The commentatorsthe schools expound the verse

Pull up a chair.

You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, open a tradition in the doorways below, or add a voice by name above.

Also hear this verse, tradition by tradition.

Where this teaching echoesin the Haripath