The one who breaks free of the pairs of opposites and turns, firm in vow, to worship the Lord.
If everyone is born into the delusion of attraction and aversion, it can seem that no one could ever turn to God at all. This verse names the exception: some people do come clear of that delusion, and worship Him with a settled, unshaken heart.
But those who act virtuously, whose sin has come to an end, are freed from the delusion of the pairs of opposites. Firm in their vows, they worship me.
It answers the objection raised by the verse just before, that all beings at birth fall into the delusion of the pairs of opposites, by naming those who do not stay trapped and so keep the path of devotion open.
Where they agreethe convergence
Across schools and centuries the commentators come to the same ground. These are the points they share, and the voices that hold each one.
You wonder how anyone breaks free, if all are born deluded; here the Lord answers that some do come clear and turn to Him, and tells you who they are.
Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Dvaita, Śuddhādvaita, Bhakti, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati · Rāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika · Jayatīrtha · Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara · Viśvanātha · Baladeva · RamsukhdasIn Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 11 others’ words
This verse answers a sharp objection. The previous verse said that all beings at birth fall into delusion, deceived by the 'pairs of opposites' (dvandva): the push and pull of attraction and aversion, pleasure and pain. So the natural question is: if everyone is deluded, how does anyone ever come to worship God at all? Krishna replies that there is an exception. Not everyone stays trapped. Some people do break free and turn to Him, and this verse describes exactly who they are and why they are able to. Many commentators frame the whole verse this way: the general rule was 'all beings are deluded,' and this verse states the exception that keeps the path of devotion open.
What frees a person is the wearing away of the inner obstruction that turned them from God, worn down little by little by good action gathered across many lives until it comes to its end.
Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Bhedābheda, Śuddhādvaita, Bhakti, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Dhanapati · Rāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika · Bhāskara · Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara · Viśvanātha · Jñāneśvar · Sivananda · TilakIn Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 11 others’ words
The condition that frees a person is the wearing away of 'papa,' usually translated as sin, but understood here specifically as the inner obstruction that blocks one from turning toward God and keeps one bound to the pairs of opposites. The commentators stress that this papa does not vanish by accident. It is worn down by 'punya-karma,' meritorious action, accumulated over many lifetimes. As good action piles up, sin dwindles to its end ('anta-gatam,' literally 'gone to its end'). The verse names these people 'punya-karmanam,' doers of meritorious deeds: their merit is the cause that purifies the inner being and clears away the obstruction.
When that obstruction is gone, the delusion born of attraction and aversion falls away with it, and you begin to see clearly; this is a real threshold, a change in the person, not a passing mood.
Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Bhedābheda, Śuddhādvaita, Bhakti, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Rāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika · Bhāskara · Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara · Viśvanātha · Jñāneśvar · Sivananda · RamsukhdasIn Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 10 others’ words
Once sin is worn away, the person becomes 'dvandva-moha-nirmukta,' freed from the delusion caused by the pairs of opposites. This is the direct fruit of the inner purification: with the obstruction gone, the confused notions rooted in attachment and aversion fall away, and the person sees clearly. Several commentators trace the chain step by step: meritorious action removes sin, the removal of sin dissolves the pair-delusion, and only when that delusion is gone can steady, single-pointed devotion stand up. The verse marks this as a real threshold, a structural change in the person, not a passing mood.
Then you worship Him firm in your vow, your heart settled in the certainty that He alone is to be worshipped, your devotion no longer scattered but single, taking refuge in no one else.
Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Śuddhādvaita, Bhedābheda, Bhakti, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Madhusūdana · Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati · Rāmānuja · Puruṣottama · Bhāskara · Śrīdhara · Viśvanātha · Baladeva · Sivananda · RamsukhdasIn Śaṅkara, Madhusūdana, and 10 others’ words
Such people then worship Krishna as 'dridha-vratah,' firm in their vow. The commentators read 'firm vow' as unshakeable resolve grounded in settled conviction: the certainty that the supreme reality is just this and no other, that the Lord alone is to be worshipped and is of just such a form. Their devotion is not tentative or scattered; it is single-minded and takes refuge in no one else. This firmness is what distinguishes the genuine worshipper described here, and it is presented as the settled, steady state that purification finally makes possible.
This is the shared ground; it can be carried as it is. Below is where they differ.
Where they differthe divergence
Advaita Vedānta, in their fuller words
These commentators read the 'firm vow' as the vow of complete renunciation rooted in non-dual knowledge: the settled discernment that the supreme reality is just this and not otherwise, and that the worshipper's own self is identical with that supreme Self. To worship 'Me, the supreme Self' is to recognize one's identity with Brahman. Sin here is given a strikingly non-dual meaning by one of these voices: the greatest sin is to forget one's identity with the Supreme Soul, to see difference, to take the body as the Self, to believe the world is real. The firm-vowed person therefore holds the conviction that Brahman alone is real and the world is like a mirage, and resolves not to budge until Self-realization is attained.
Viśiṣṭādvaita, in their fuller words
These commentators read the verse as the necessary precondition for worship, then immediately specify what such worshippers seek. The sin worn away is 'quality-made' sin, set going from beginningless time, the very thing that produces the pairs and turns one away from the Lord. After purification by an excellent heap of merit over many births, these worshippers take refuge in Him and worship Him for definite ends: release from old age and death, the direct sight of the self's own form as utterly distinct from matter, the attaining of great lordship, and finally the attaining of the Lord Himself. Here liberation is not absorption into an identityless absolute but the self, set apart from matter, reaching its Lord; one of these voices notes the verse supplies the 'inner anchor' for the chapter's earlier talk of refuge and devotion.
Dvaita, in their fuller words
These commentators read the verse tersely as marking off a distinct class: 'there are some who are otherwise,' some who are free of the pair-delusion. Their concern is interpretive precision. One addresses why the verse is not redundant with the earlier 'fourfold' statement of who worships, and presses the question of how it is determined whether taking refuge in the Lord is caused by maya or not, when some fail to take refuge 'either from their own fault or otherwise.' The point they secure is that if all beings without exception came to delusion, the path of liberation would simply be wiped out; this verse preserves it by naming those who are free.
Śuddhādvaita, in their fuller words
These commentators stress that on the 'pusti' path, the path of grace, the ending of sin is not finally the worshipper's own achievement but the Lord's own grace. One reads the word 'tu' (but) as marking deliverance itself. The other describes these worshippers as rare and fortunate ones, accustomed to virtue by the Lord's darshan, humble toward the great, in whom the sin that hinders knowledge of His essential nature has been destroyed; freed specifically from the delusion of their own private pleasure and pain, single-mindedly fixed on Him, they worship. He adds a vivid psychology: as merit ripens over many lives and the fear of death presses upon a person in old age, that very fear drives them, seeking release, into the Lord's worship, and cites scripture that after thousands of births of austerity, knowledge and samadhi, devotion to Krishna arises in those whose sins are worn down.
Kashmir Śaiva, in their fuller words
This commentator reads the verse expansively as the destruction of tamas (darkness) and the tearing apart of the canopy of great delusion. Those who have made their self secure by wearing away both merit and demerit then 'know that all is Brahman, studded with the rays of the Blessed One,' from which even the darkness of old age and death has flowed away. They know the self, the elements, the gods and the sacrifice as nothing but other forms of the Lord. Because their inner organ is always made firm in the Blessed One, they remember the supreme Lord even at the final hour of departure, for their very birth is already grounded in His truth. He pointedly dismisses those who ask 'what use is preparing for a future birth?': for them, he says, silence alone is fitting.
Bhakti, in their fuller words
These devotional commentators draw out the rise of single-pointed ('ekantin') devotion, but one of them adds a crucial qualification that sets him apart from the general reading. He distinguishes degrees: when sin is merely in a 'perishing state' near its close but not completely destroyed, sattva grows, tamas and its delusion diminish, and such a person worships only loosely, by the chance company of devotees. But when sin is completely destroyed through the practice of worship itself, the person is wholly freed from delusion and worships steadily. He then insists that meritorious action must not be taken as the real cause of pure devotion at all: citing scripture that the Lord cannot be attained by yoga, analysis, gifts, vows, austerities, sacrifices, study or renunciation, he holds that for pure devotion, merit and the like are in no way the cause. Another of these voices grounds the worshippers' freedom from evil in 'the spontaneous glance of a most exalted one,' a great devotee, and in association with the great, rather than in merit narrowly understood. A third paints it as a journey: seeing the thorns of doubt and error, they walk straight on the strength of their righteous deeds, crush the thorns of evil thoughts underfoot, cross the wild jungle of great sins, and come near the Lord, escaping unhurt from the robbers of passion and wrath.
A modern reading, in their fuller words
One modern commentator reframes 'punya-karma' and 'papa' entirely in terms of orientation toward God. The truly meritorious are not those rich in ritual but those in whom the firm resolve has settled that this human body is not for enjoying sense-objects but, by God's grace, only for attaining Him. He teaches that this purity comes from one's own inner determination, not from outward sacrifice, charity and austerity. He offers a memorable accounting: there is only 'one and a half' sin and 'one and a half' merit. To turn away from God is the full sin and bad conduct is the half sin; to turn toward God is the full merit and good conduct is the half merit. When a person turns toward God ('bhagavat-sammukhata'), turning-away goes, and with it the very root of all sins is cut. Another modern voice describes the gradual purification of the heart by good deeds, sattva increasing while rajas and tamas thin out, the small self-arrogating personality slowly dying until one becomes impersonal and the divine flame burns brighter.
A few questions to carry
These ask for understanding, not recall; each answer is settled by the commentary itself.
For a second sitting
Carry this with youwhat stays
If the long arithmetic of many lifetimes feels discouraging, one teacher offers a way to begin today. Do not measure yourself by sacrifices, charity or austerity done outwardly. Measure only this: which way are you facing? The whole of merit, he says, is simply turning toward God; the whole of sin is turning away. So the practice is not to wait until you are pure enough, but to let one firm resolve settle in you now: that this human life is not given for chasing pleasures but, by God's grace, for reaching Him alone. The moment you genuinely turn toward Him, the turning-away that is the root of all your sins is already cut, and even an old habit-born fault, he says, cannot remain, for the Lord seated in the heart wears it away. Begin, then, with the orientation of the heart, and let the purification follow.
Do not wait until you feel pure enough; ask only which way you are facing, and let one quiet resolve settle in you today, that this life is given not for chasing pleasures but for reaching Him alone.
Read deeper
Everything a full study holds, folded below.
Word by word
All the commentary, woven together
The commentary, woven together
machine-assisted draft, pending review
Convergence
his verse answers a sharp objection. The previous verse said that all beings at birth fall into delusion, deceived by the 'pairs of opposites' (dvandva): the push and pull of attraction and aversion, pleasure and pain. So the natural question is: if everyone is deluded, how does anyone ever come to worship God at all? Krishna replies that there is an exception. Not everyone stays trapped. Some people do break free and turn to Him, and this verse describes exactly who they are and why they are able to. Many commentators frame the whole verse this way: the general rule was 'all beings are deluded,' and this verse states the exception that keeps the path of devotion open.
Braided from 13 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Śrī Jayatīrtha · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Ramsukhdas
The condition that frees a person is the wearing away of 'papa,' usually translated as sin, but understood here specifically as the inner obstruction that blocks one from turning toward God and keeps one bound to the pairs of opposites. The commentators stress that this papa does not vanish by accident. It is worn down by 'punya-karma,' meritorious action, accumulated over many lifetimes. As good action piles up, sin dwindles to its end ('anta-gatam,' literally 'gone to its end'). The verse names these people 'punya-karmanam,' doers of meritorious deeds: their merit is the cause that purifies the inner being and clears away the obstruction.
Braided from 13 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Śrī Bhāskara · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Sant Jñāneśvar · Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak
Once sin is worn away, the person becomes 'dvandva-moha-nirmukta,' freed from the delusion caused by the pairs of opposites. This is the direct fruit of the inner purification: with the obstruction gone, the confused notions rooted in attachment and aversion fall away, and the person sees clearly. Several commentators trace the chain step by step: meritorious action removes sin, the removal of sin dissolves the pair-delusion, and only when that delusion is gone can steady, single-pointed devotion stand up. The verse marks this as a real threshold, a structural change in the person, not a passing mood.
Braided from 12 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Śrī Bhāskara · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Sant Jñāneśvar · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas
Such people then worship Krishna as 'dridha-vratah,' firm in their vow. The commentators read 'firm vow' as unshakeable resolve grounded in settled conviction: the certainty that the supreme reality is just this and no other, that the Lord alone is to be worshipped and is of just such a form. Their devotion is not tentative or scattered; it is single-minded and takes refuge in no one else. This firmness is what distinguishes the genuine worshipper described here, and it is presented as the settled, steady state that purification finally makes possible.
Braided from 12 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrī Bhāskara · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas
Divergence
Advaita Vedānta
These commentators read the 'firm vow' as the vow of complete renunciation rooted in non-dual knowledge: the settled discernment that the supreme reality is just this and not otherwise, and that the worshipper's own self is identical with that supreme Self. To worship 'Me, the supreme Self' is to recognize one's identity with Brahman. Sin here is given a strikingly non-dual meaning by one of these voices: the greatest sin is to forget one's identity with the Supreme Soul, to see difference, to take the body as the Self, to believe the world is real. The firm-vowed person therefore holds the conviction that Brahman alone is real and the world is like a mirage, and resolves not to budge until Self-realization is attained.
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Swami Sivananda
Viśiṣṭādvaita
These commentators read the verse as the necessary precondition for worship, then immediately specify what such worshippers seek. The sin worn away is 'quality-made' sin, set going from beginningless time, the very thing that produces the pairs and turns one away from the Lord. After purification by an excellent heap of merit over many births, these worshippers take refuge in Him and worship Him for definite ends: release from old age and death, the direct sight of the self's own form as utterly distinct from matter, the attaining of great lordship, and finally the attaining of the Lord Himself. Here liberation is not absorption into an identityless absolute but the self, set apart from matter, reaching its Lord; one of these voices notes the verse supplies the 'inner anchor' for the chapter's earlier talk of refuge and devotion.
Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika
Dvaita
These commentators read the verse tersely as marking off a distinct class: 'there are some who are otherwise,' some who are free of the pair-delusion. Their concern is interpretive precision. One addresses why the verse is not redundant with the earlier 'fourfold' statement of who worships, and presses the question of how it is determined whether taking refuge in the Lord is caused by maya or not, when some fail to take refuge 'either from their own fault or otherwise.' The point they secure is that if all beings without exception came to delusion, the path of liberation would simply be wiped out; this verse preserves it by naming those who are free.
Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha
Śuddhādvaita
These commentators stress that on the 'pusti' path, the path of grace, the ending of sin is not finally the worshipper's own achievement but the Lord's own grace. One reads the word 'tu' (but) as marking deliverance itself. The other describes these worshippers as rare and fortunate ones, accustomed to virtue by the Lord's darshan, humble toward the great, in whom the sin that hinders knowledge of His essential nature has been destroyed; freed specifically from the delusion of their own private pleasure and pain, single-mindedly fixed on Him, they worship. He adds a vivid psychology: as merit ripens over many lives and the fear of death presses upon a person in old age, that very fear drives them, seeking release, into the Lord's worship, and cites scripture that after thousands of births of austerity, knowledge and samadhi, devotion to Krishna arises in those whose sins are worn down.
Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama
Kashmir Shaivism
This commentator reads the verse expansively as the destruction of tamas (darkness) and the tearing apart of the canopy of great delusion. Those who have made their self secure by wearing away both merit and demerit then 'know that all is Brahman, studded with the rays of the Blessed One,' from which even the darkness of old age and death has flowed away. They know the self, the elements, the gods and the sacrifice as nothing but other forms of the Lord. Because their inner organ is always made firm in the Blessed One, they remember the supreme Lord even at the final hour of departure, for their very birth is already grounded in His truth. He pointedly dismisses those who ask 'what use is preparing for a future birth?': for them, he says, silence alone is fitting.
Ācārya Abhinavagupta
Bhakti
These devotional commentators draw out the rise of single-pointed ('ekantin') devotion, but one of them adds a crucial qualification that sets him apart from the general reading. He distinguishes degrees: when sin is merely in a 'perishing state' near its close but not completely destroyed, sattva grows, tamas and its delusion diminish, and such a person worships only loosely, by the chance company of devotees. But when sin is completely destroyed through the practice of worship itself, the person is wholly freed from delusion and worships steadily. He then insists that meritorious action must not be taken as the real cause of pure devotion at all: citing scripture that the Lord cannot be attained by yoga, analysis, gifts, vows, austerities, sacrifices, study or renunciation, he holds that for pure devotion, merit and the like are in no way the cause. Another of these voices grounds the worshippers' freedom from evil in 'the spontaneous glance of a most exalted one,' a great devotee, and in association with the great, rather than in merit narrowly understood. A third paints it as a journey: seeing the thorns of doubt and error, they walk straight on the strength of their righteous deeds, crush the thorns of evil thoughts underfoot, cross the wild jungle of great sins, and come near the Lord, escaping unhurt from the robbers of passion and wrath.
Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar
Modern
One modern commentator reframes 'punya-karma' and 'papa' entirely in terms of orientation toward God. The truly meritorious are not those rich in ritual but those in whom the firm resolve has settled that this human body is not for enjoying sense-objects but, by God's grace, only for attaining Him. He teaches that this purity comes from one's own inner determination, not from outward sacrifice, charity and austerity. He offers a memorable accounting: there is only 'one and a half' sin and 'one and a half' merit. To turn away from God is the full sin and bad conduct is the half sin; to turn toward God is the full merit and good conduct is the half merit. When a person turns toward God ('bhagavat-sammukhata'), turning-away goes, and with it the very root of all sins is cut. Another modern voice describes the gradual purification of the heart by good deeds, sattva increasing while rajas and tamas thin out, the small self-arrogating personality slowly dying until one becomes impersonal and the divine flame burns brighter.
Swami Ramsukhdas · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Sivananda
A Seeker Asks
If breaking free of delusion enough to worship God truly requires merit piled up over many lifetimes, what hope or starting point does an ordinary person have in this one life right now?
First, the long road is real but it is not the only account the commentators give. Some explicitly locate the turning-point not in your own ledger of accumulated merit but in grace: the ending of sin, on the path of grace, is the Lord's own gift, not finally your achievement. Others say the freedom from evil comes through 'the spontaneous glance of a most exalted one,' a great soul, and through association with the great. So the starting point can be given to you from outside your own effort, which means it is available now and not only at the end of a long climb.
Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrīla Baladeva
Second, the cause that matters most is not the quantity of ritual merit but the direction of the heart, and that you can change immediately. One teacher redefines merit itself as turning toward God: the instant you genuinely turn toward Him, the turning-away that is the very root of sin is cut. Another points out that pure devotion is in no way produced by yoga, gifts, vows or austerities at all, so you are never disqualified by a thin résumé of good works; what counts is single-pointed worship itself, which deepens the purification rather than waiting on it.
Swami Ramsukhdas · Śrīla Viśvanātha
Third, the verse still gives you concrete ground to stand on today: keep doing good, and let the heart be purified by it. Good deeds slowly increase sattva while rajas and tamas thin out, the mind grows calm, and the small self-arrogating personality dies down. You need not see the whole road; you need only take the next honest step in faith, crushing the thorns of doubt and error underfoot and walking straight toward Him on the strength of your righteous conduct.
Swami Sivananda · Sant Jñāneśvar
Contemplation
If the long arithmetic of many lifetimes feels discouraging, one teacher offers a way to begin today. Do not measure yourself by sacrifices, charity or austerity done outwardly. Measure only this: which way are you facing? The whole of merit, he says, is simply turning toward God; the whole of sin is turning away. So the practice is not to wait until you are pure enough, but to let one firm resolve settle in you now: that this human life is not given for chasing pleasures but, by God's grace, for reaching Him alone. The moment you genuinely turn toward Him, the turning-away that is the root of all your sins is already cut, and even an old habit-born fault, he says, cannot remain, for the Lord seated in the heart wears it away. Begin, then, with the orientation of the heart, and let the purification follow.
Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas
All the translations and commentary
Pull up a chair.
You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.