StudyVedanta
Skip to the verse
V.27.17.3
Read slowly

Krishna's pledge: when you truly know him, nothing further is left here to be known.

It is easy to hear this as a promise that you will hold every fact about every thing. What is meant is something quieter and larger: knowing the supreme reality, the very root of all, the restless search from one thing to the next comes to rest.

2Chapter 7
The verseSpoken by Krishna
Voices18 commentators · 6 schools · modern voices
The readingAbout 5 minutes, unhurried
ज्ञानं तेऽहं सविज्ञानमिदं वक्ष्याम्यशेषतः। यज्ज्ञात्वा नेह भूयोऽन्यज्ज्ञातव्यमवशिष्यते
jñānaṁ te ’haṁ sa-vijñānam idaṁ vakṣhyāmyaśheṣhataḥ yaj jñātvā neha bhūyo ’nyaj jñātavyam-avaśhiṣhyate

I will tell you this knowledge in full, together with realization. Once you know it, nothing else here remains to be known.

Bhagavad Gita 7.2
—:—— / —:——

Saved for this reading session

Three movements · tap a label to switch

Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda

Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur

Krishna turns from the paths of yoga to make his own grand pledge, that he will declare this knowledge in full, holding nothing back, and so prepare Arjuna to receive what crowns the whole chapter.

Where they agreethe convergence

This knowledge is teaching joined with direct seeing, and to truly know it is to have accomplished, in this very life, the knower's whole purpose.

Across schools and centuries the commentators come to the same ground. These are the points they share, and the voices that hold each one.

4schools

Hear who is promising you this. Krishna himself will declare this knowledge to you, holding nothing back, so come attentive and ready to receive it whole.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Śuddhādvaita, Bhakti, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati · Rāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabha · Śrīdhara · Viśvanātha · Baladeva · Sivananda · Ramsukhdas
In Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 11 others’ words

Krishna is making a deliberate promise here, and the commentators agree he frames it grandly on purpose. He says he himself will declare this knowledge to Arjuna in full, holding nothing back. Several note that he praises the knowledge precisely to draw the listener in: by announcing how rare and complete it is, he makes Arjuna attentive, eager, and ready to receive it with care. The promise is not a casual aside but the load-bearing pledge of the chapter, telling the seeker that what follows is sufficient in itself and needs no supplement from elsewhere.

Asked in question 1, below
5schools

Two things are named, the teaching and the seeing. The words you are given are meant to ripen into your own direct, inward recognition, not to stay borrowed report.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Śuddhādvaita, Bhedābheda, Bhakti, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati · Rāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabha · Puruṣottama · Bhāskara · Śrīdhara · Viśvanātha · Baladeva · Sivananda · Tilak · Ramsukhdas
In Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 14 others’ words

The verse names two things, jnana and vijnana, and the commentators broadly read them as a pair: jnana is knowledge taught in words, the teaching as it stands in scripture, while vijnana is direct experience or realization that accompanies and confirms it. The distinction matters because the commentators raise a worry: if Krishna merely says 'you will know,' the knowledge might be only secondhand, mediate, known from words alone. Adding vijnana answers that worry. The teaching is meant to ripen into immediate, inward seeing, not to remain mere hearsay; one commentator gives the everyday example of being told 'you are the tenth' (when a counter has forgotten to count himself), where a single word can trigger immediate, direct recognition rather than borrowed report.

Asked in question 3, below
5schools

Knowing this one supreme reality, you become in effect all-knowing, for nothing finally stands apart from its source; here, in this very life, no goal is left still to be reached by knowing.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Śuddhādvaita, Bhedābheda, Bhakti, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati · Rāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika · Puruṣottama · Bhāskara · Śrīdhara · Baladeva · Sivananda · Tilak · Ramsukhdas
In Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 12 others’ words

The second line carries the great claim: knowing this, nothing further remains here to be known. The commentators ground this in a famous scriptural promise (cited variously from the Upanishads) that by knowing one thing, all things are known. Knowing the supreme reality, the knower becomes, in effect, all-knowing. Many add the qualifier 'here': in this very life, on this path, nothing more is left as a goal still to be reached by knowing. So one who truly knows Krishna has, by that very knowing, accomplished his purpose.

Asked in question 2, below
2schools

Because its fruit is so high, this knowledge is rare and hard to win; the praise is not flattery but preparation for how few ever come to it.

Across Advaita, ViśiṣṭādvaitaŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja
In Śaṅkara and Rāmānuja’s words

Because its fruit is so distinguished, this knowledge is understood to be hard to win, and the verse leads directly into Krishna's next remark about how rarely anyone attains it. The praise here is therefore not flattery but preparation: the knowledge crowns a person's whole purpose, so it cannot be casually picked up.

This is the shared ground; it can be carried as it is. Below is where they differ.

Where they differthe divergence

The question they answer differently
When Krishna says nothing else remains to be known, why is nothing left over: because the many separate things are finally unreal upon one being, or because they stay real but are held within the Lord as their ground?
The traditional commentators
Advaita VedāntaŚaṅkara, Ānandagiri, Madhusūdana
There is finally only one reality to know, pure consciousness; once it is realized the separate things are cancelled and bare being alone remains.
Non-dual reading: the world is imagined upon the one Self.
Advaita Vedānta, in their fuller words

For this school the knowledge is of the one non-dual reality, pure consciousness, the single substrate underlying the whole world. Vijnana is the direct, immediate experience in which the bare being that grounds everything is realized. When that one reality is known, all the imagined, separate things are cancelled and bare being alone remains; doubt is uprooted and everything is seen as the Self alone. This is why knowing the one is knowing all: there is finally only one thing to be known, and once it is realized, nothing else is left over because nothing else ultimately stands apart from it.

Śaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati
ViśiṣṭādvaitaRāmānuja, Vedānta Deśika
Knowing the Lord is knowing all because he is the inner ground of every conscious and unconscious thing; the many remain real, held within him.
The world is not denied and does not become the Lord.
Viśiṣṭādvaita, in their fuller words

Here jnana is knowledge of the Lord's own nature, and vijnana is discernment of the Lord as distinct, knowing how he differs from every conscious and unconscious thing, being the opposite of all that is to be shunned and possessing endless auspicious qualities. The claim that nothing else remains to be known is read carefully: it does not deny the many things of the world, nor say the world has become the Lord. Rather, because the Lord is the inner ground of all, to know the ground is to know the grounded in their grounding, so the knowing of the Lord exhausts the function of knowing. This pair amounts to steady remembrance, which is bhakti-yoga itself, cutting through the knot of nescience; the verse promises a consummation reached in this very body and life, not a monist absorption.

Rāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika
DvaitaMadhva, Jayatīrtha
This knowledge has the Lord for its object and realization is knowledge of particulars about him; the two terms stay sharply distinct, not merged into one being.
Resists the non-dual gloss of realization.
Dvaita, in their fuller words

This school keeps the two terms sharply distinct and resists the non-dual reading. 'This knowledge' has the Lord for its object, and vijnana is knowledge of particulars. One source explicitly rejects glossing vijnana as 'joined with one's own experience' in the non-dual sense, arguing instead that the word points to what Krishna is actually about to teach about himself; the back-reference 'this' is justified because the Lord, being the matter under discussion, makes knowledge related to him the matter under discussion too.

Madhva · Jayatīrtha
ŚuddhādvaitaVallabha, Puruṣottama
This is knowledge of Purushottama's greatness and the right knowing of his variety, conscious and unconscious, each glory understood as belonging to him.
Given inclusive of his play, reaching servanthood to him.
Śuddhādvaita, in their fuller words

Here jnana is knowledge of the Lord's greatness, and vijnana is right knowing of his variety as both conscious (cit) and unconscious (acit), with each of his glories (vibhuti) understood as a property belonging to him. One source frames the whole teaching as the knowledge of Purushottama's own form, given inclusive of his play (lila); once one knows one's essential nature together with direct experience of it, nothing remains to be known in this path of his devotion, in this land, or in this human birth, and by such knowledge alone the experience of servanthood to him is reached.

Vallabha · Puruṣottama
BhedābhedaBhāskara
The teaching unveils the Lord's essential nature together with the direct realization, recognized as I am that, after which nothing further remains.
Identity recognized within the disclosure of his nature.
Bhedābheda, in their fuller words

Knowledge here is the disclosure of the Lord's essential nature, declared together with direct realization of it. This source identifies the special knowledge (vijnana) with the recognition 'I am that,' holding the verse together as the unveiling of the Lord's nature, after knowing which nothing further remains in this world to be known.

Bhāskara
BhaktiŚrīdhara, Viśvanātha, Baladeva
Knowledge of Krishna's majesty ripens into direct experience of his sweetness; even his impersonal Brahman-nature is contained within this very knowing.
Devotional content, the impersonal included not excluded.
Bhakti, in their fuller words

For this school jnana is the scriptural teaching about Krishna and vijnana is the accompanying direct experience, but the content is read devotionally. One source distinguishes knowledge of Krishna's majesty, which can come even before deep attachment in devotion, from the later direct realization of his sweetness; both are promised here. Another reads the knowledge as concerning Krishna's essential nature as possessor of the conscious and unconscious potencies, with vijnana being the discernment of that nature as distinct from those two potencies. Notably, one source holds that even knowledge of Krishna's impersonal Brahman-nature is included within this very knowledge, so the devotional knowing does not exclude but contains the impersonal. By this knowing the seeker on the path of the highest good becomes one whose purpose is fully accomplished.

Śrīdhara · Viśvanātha · Baladeva
Modern voices teachers of the last two centuries, read together; they stand apart from the classical schools
A modern readingSivananda, Tilak, Ramsukhdas
Indirect knowledge from the Upanishads ripens into direct Self-realization; for one voice this perfects karma-yoga taken up after sheltering in the Lord.
Affirms the broad Vedantic reading with particular emphases.
A modern reading, in their fuller words

These voices largely affirm the broad Vedantic reading while drawing out particular emphases. One identifies jnana as indirect knowledge of Brahman gained through study of the Upanishads and vijnana as direct Self-realization, and reads the verse as the promise of omniscience: knowing the Self, one knows everything. Another argues, on the authority of the Upanishads (the clay-ball illustration and the Mundaka question), that jnana and vijnana are the synthetic and analytical knowledge of the supreme, and insists this knowledge is offered not independently but as a means for perfecting karma-yoga taken up after one has taken shelter in the Lord. A third stresses the force of 'I myself shall declare it': Krishna, the complete supreme, teaches from his own unbroken knowledge that was never ignorant and never hidden, unlike any human teacher whose knowledge is borrowed and partial, so the teaching is given from the very root reality and leaves nothing further to be said or known.

Sivananda · Tilak · Ramsukhdas
Sit with these

A few questions to carry

These ask for understanding, not recall; each answer is settled by the commentary itself.

1
Why does Krishna stress that he himself will declare this knowledge in full?
2
What does it mean that, knowing this, nothing further remains here to be known?
3
How do the commentators read the pair jnana and vijnana in this verse?
4
A seeker asks how knowing one thing could leave nothing to know when the world is full of unknowns. What answers it?
For a second sitting7 more questions
5
What does the small word here add to the promise that nothing remains to be known?
6
On the Advaita reading, why is nothing left over once the one reality is known?
7
How does Vishishtadvaita read the claim that nothing else remains to be known?
8
Why do the commentators call the praise of this knowledge preparation rather than flattery?
9
How does the Dvaita school treat jnana and vijnana, against the non-dual reading?
10
How does the Bhakti school read what is known in this verse?
11
What does Shankara's example of the tenth man illustrate about this knowledge?

Carry this with youwhat stays

Notice who is speaking. Krishna does not say a teacher will tell you about him; he says, I myself shall declare it, and I shall declare it in fullness. Every human guide first learned and only later came to know, so what they pass on is borrowed and shaped by their own small portion of understanding. Krishna's knowledge was never broken, never hidden, never preceded by ignorance. So when you come to this teaching, come trusting that it is given from the very root of reality, complete and lacking nothing. You are not being handed a fragment to piece together later. You are being told the whole, from the one who has always known it, so that knowing it, nothing essential is left for you still to seek.

Come to this teaching trusting that it is given whole, from the one who has always known it, so that knowing it, nothing essential is left for you still to seek.

ज्ञानं तेऽहं सविज्ञानमिदं वक्ष्याम्यशेषतः।jñānaṁ te ’haṁ sa-vijñānam idaṁ vakṣhyāmyaśheṣhataḥ

Read deeper

Everything a full study holds, folded below.

Word by word16 terms
jñānamknowledgeteunto youahamIsawithvijñānamwisdomidamthisvakṣhyāmishall revealaśheṣhataḥin fullyatwhichjñātvāhaving knownnanotihain this worldbhūyaḥfurtheranyatanything elsejñātavyamto be knownavaśhiṣhyateremains
All the commentary, woven togetherevery voice, in one place

The commentary, woven together

machine-assisted draft, pending review

Convergence

rishna is making a deliberate promise here, and the commentators agree he frames it grandly on purpose. He says he himself will declare this knowledge to Arjuna in full, holding nothing back. Several note that he praises the knowledge precisely to draw the listener in: by announcing how rare and complete it is, he makes Arjuna attentive, eager, and ready to receive it with care. The promise is not a casual aside but the load-bearing pledge of the chapter, telling the seeker that what follows is sufficient in itself and needs no supplement from elsewhere.

Braided from 13 commentators

Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabhācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas

The verse names two things, jnana and vijnana, and the commentators broadly read them as a pair: jnana is knowledge taught in words, the teaching as it stands in scripture, while vijnana is direct experience or realization that accompanies and confirms it. The distinction matters because the commentators raise a worry: if Krishna merely says 'you will know,' the knowledge might be only secondhand, mediate, known from words alone. Adding vijnana answers that worry. The teaching is meant to ripen into immediate, inward seeing, not to remain mere hearsay; one commentator gives the everyday example of being told 'you are the tenth' (when a counter has forgotten to count himself), where a single word can trigger immediate, direct recognition rather than borrowed report.

Braided from 16 commentators

Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrī Bhāskara · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas

The second line carries the great claim: knowing this, nothing further remains here to be known. The commentators ground this in a famous scriptural promise (cited variously from the Upanishads) that by knowing one thing, all things are known. Knowing the supreme reality, the knower becomes, in effect, all-knowing. Many add the qualifier 'here': in this very life, on this path, nothing more is left as a goal still to be reached by knowing. So one who truly knows Krishna has, by that very knowing, accomplished his purpose.

Braided from 14 commentators

Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrī Bhāskara · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas

Because its fruit is so distinguished, this knowledge is understood to be hard to win, and the verse leads directly into Krishna's next remark about how rarely anyone attains it. The praise here is therefore not flattery but preparation: the knowledge crowns a person's whole purpose, so it cannot be casually picked up.

Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya

Divergence

Advaita Vedānta

For this school the knowledge is of the one non-dual reality, pure consciousness, the single substrate underlying the whole world. Vijnana is the direct, immediate experience in which the bare being that grounds everything is realized. When that one reality is known, all the imagined, separate things are cancelled and bare being alone remains; doubt is uprooted and everything is seen as the Self alone. This is why knowing the one is knowing all: there is finally only one thing to be known, and once it is realized, nothing else is left over because nothing else ultimately stands apart from it.

Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri

Viśiṣṭādvaita

Here jnana is knowledge of the Lord's own nature, and vijnana is discernment of the Lord as distinct, knowing how he differs from every conscious and unconscious thing, being the opposite of all that is to be shunned and possessing endless auspicious qualities. The claim that nothing else remains to be known is read carefully: it does not deny the many things of the world, nor say the world has become the Lord. Rather, because the Lord is the inner ground of all, to know the ground is to know the grounded in their grounding, so the knowing of the Lord exhausts the function of knowing. This pair amounts to steady remembrance, which is bhakti-yoga itself, cutting through the knot of nescience; the verse promises a consummation reached in this very body and life, not a monist absorption.

Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika

Dvaita

This school keeps the two terms sharply distinct and resists the non-dual reading. 'This knowledge' has the Lord for its object, and vijnana is knowledge of particulars. One source explicitly rejects glossing vijnana as 'joined with one's own experience' in the non-dual sense, arguing instead that the word points to what Krishna is actually about to teach about himself; the back-reference 'this' is justified because the Lord, being the matter under discussion, makes knowledge related to him the matter under discussion too.

Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha

Śuddhādvaita

Here jnana is knowledge of the Lord's greatness, and vijnana is right knowing of his variety as both conscious (cit) and unconscious (acit), with each of his glories (vibhuti) understood as a property belonging to him. One source frames the whole teaching as the knowledge of Purushottama's own form, given inclusive of his play (lila); once one knows one's essential nature together with direct experience of it, nothing remains to be known in this path of his devotion, in this land, or in this human birth, and by such knowledge alone the experience of servanthood to him is reached.

Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama

Bhedabheda

Knowledge here is the disclosure of the Lord's essential nature, declared together with direct realization of it. This source identifies the special knowledge (vijnana) with the recognition 'I am that,' holding the verse together as the unveiling of the Lord's nature, after knowing which nothing further remains in this world to be known.

Śrī Bhāskara

Bhakti

For this school jnana is the scriptural teaching about Krishna and vijnana is the accompanying direct experience, but the content is read devotionally. One source distinguishes knowledge of Krishna's majesty, which can come even before deep attachment in devotion, from the later direct realization of his sweetness; both are promised here. Another reads the knowledge as concerning Krishna's essential nature as possessor of the conscious and unconscious potencies, with vijnana being the discernment of that nature as distinct from those two potencies. Notably, one source holds that even knowledge of Krishna's impersonal Brahman-nature is included within this very knowledge, so the devotional knowing does not exclude but contains the impersonal. By this knowing the seeker on the path of the highest good becomes one whose purpose is fully accomplished.

Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva

Modern

These voices largely affirm the broad Vedantic reading while drawing out particular emphases. One identifies jnana as indirect knowledge of Brahman gained through study of the Upanishads and vijnana as direct Self-realization, and reads the verse as the promise of omniscience: knowing the Self, one knows everything. Another argues, on the authority of the Upanishads (the clay-ball illustration and the Mundaka question), that jnana and vijnana are the synthetic and analytical knowledge of the supreme, and insists this knowledge is offered not independently but as a means for perfecting karma-yoga taken up after one has taken shelter in the Lord. A third stresses the force of 'I myself shall declare it': Krishna, the complete supreme, teaches from his own unbroken knowledge that was never ignorant and never hidden, unlike any human teacher whose knowledge is borrowed and partial, so the teaching is given from the very root reality and leaves nothing further to be said or known.

Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas

A Seeker Asks

How can knowing one thing, even God, possibly mean there is nothing left to know, when the world is plainly full of countless things still unknown to me?

The claim is not that you will suddenly hold every fact about every object. It rests on a scriptural promise that by knowing one thing, all is known, and the commentators take this to mean that the supreme is the inner ground and substrate of everything else. To know the ground is to know the grounded in their grounding; the function of knowing, when turned to the source of all, is fulfilled, because nothing stands finally apart from that source.

Śrī Ānandagiri · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Lokmanya Tilak · Vedānta Deśika

The qualifier 'here' is doing quiet work. The verse says nothing further remains to be known here, in this life, on this path, as a goal still to be reached. It is the end of seeking, not the end of all learning. Once the one reality is realized, the seeker has accomplished his very purpose and becomes, in effect, all-knowing; the restless search that drives a person from object to object comes to rest.

Śaṅkarācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Swami Sivananda · Śrī Puruṣottama

The schools differ on exactly why nothing is left over, and the difference is worth keeping in view. For the non-dual reading, the separate things were finally imagined upon one bare being, so when that being is realized they are cancelled and only it remains. For the qualified-non-dual and devotional readings, the world is real but held within the Lord as its inner ground, so knowing the Lord is knowing all without the world ceasing to be many. Either way, the verse promises completion of the knower's purpose, not a magical inventory of facts.

Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Rāmānujācārya · Śrīla Baladeva · Śrīla Viśvanātha

Contemplation

Notice who is speaking. Krishna does not say a teacher will tell you about him; he says, I myself shall declare it, and I shall declare it in fullness. Every human guide first learned and only later came to know, so what they pass on is borrowed and shaped by their own small portion of understanding. Krishna's knowledge was never broken, never hidden, never preceded by ignorance. So when you come to this teaching, come trusting that it is given from the very root of reality, complete and lacking nothing. You are not being handed a fragment to piece together later. You are being told the whole, from the one who has always known it, so that knowing it, nothing essential is left for you still to seek.

Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas

All the translations and commentary7 translations

Pull up a chair.

You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.

Where this teaching echoesin the Haripath