Why the Lord calls the one who knows Him, and wants nothing else, His very Self.
When the Lord singles out the knower as exceedingly dear, you might fear the one who comes to God in need is left behind. He is not; the verse marks a difference of degree in love, not a door closed.
All of these are noble. But the one who knows is My very Self. This is My view. Steadfast in mind, he is set on Me alone as the supreme goal.
Having just named four kinds of devotee who turn to Him, the one in distress, the seeker of knowledge, the seeker of gain, and the knower, He pauses here to call them all noble before lifting up the knower, so that praising one is not heard as rejecting the rest.
Where they agreethe convergence
Across schools and centuries the commentators come to the same ground. These are the points they share, and the voices that hold each one.
All four who turn to Him are noble, large-souled; to take anything at all from the Lord is to give Him your whole affection, and He counts that a great gift.
Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Śuddhādvaita, Bhedābheda, Bhakti, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati · Rāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabha · Puruṣottama · Bhāskara · Śrīdhara · Viśvanātha · Baladeva · Jñāneśvar · Sivananda · Tilak · RamsukhdasIn Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 15 others’ words
All four kinds of devotee named just before this verse, the one in distress, the seeker of knowledge, the seeker of wealth, and the knower, are 'udara', which the commentators render as noble, large-souled, or generous. The verse exists partly to head off a wrong inference: when Krishna goes on to single out the knower as exceedingly dear, a reader might conclude the other three are unwelcome to him. He says no. All of them turn to him rather than to lesser deities, and that alone makes them worthy. Several commentators add a concrete reason for the praise: those who take anything at all from the Lord are in effect giving him their whole affection, and the Lord, who is fond of his devotees, counts that as a great gift in return.
No one who turns to Him is undear; He meets you in the very way you come to Him, and the one who wants nothing but Him receives the whole of His love.
Across Advaita, Bhakti, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Madhusūdana · Dhanapati · Viśvanātha · Baladeva · Ramsukhdas · JñāneśvarIn Śaṅkara, Madhusūdana, and 5 others’ words
No devotee of the Lord is undear to him; the difference is one of degree, not of rejection. The word 'tu' (but) and the qualifier 'exceedingly' mark a ranking, not an exclusion. Several commentators ground this in the Gita's own earlier promise that the Lord meets people in the very way they come to him: those who serve him for a particular fruit, he serves with that fruit, while the one who wants nothing but him receives the whole of his love. So the three desire-driven devotees are genuinely dear, but their dearness is mixed in with the things they want, whereas the knower, wanting nothing else, becomes the single undivided object of the Lord's love.
The knower asks nothing, not the world, not heaven, not even release as a separate prize; his mind is gathered and set on the Lord alone as the highest there is.
Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Śuddhādvaita, Bhedābheda, Bhakti, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati · Rāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabha · Puruṣottama · Bhāskara · Śrīdhara · Viśvanātha · Baladeva · Jñāneśvar · Sivananda · Tilak · RamsukhdasIn Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 15 others’ words
The knower's distinguishing mark is desirelessness aimed entirely at the Lord. He asks nothing from the Lord, neither worldly gain nor heaven nor even liberation as a separate prize, because he holds no fruit apart from the Lord to be a fruit at all. His mind is gathered and steady ('yuktatma'), settled on the Lord alone. This single-pointedness is what the second half of the verse states directly: he has taken his stand in the Lord as 'anuttama gati', the unsurpassed goal, the highest destination than which nothing stands higher, and that destination is the Lord himself.
Because he has made the Lord his all and leans on nothing else, the Lord holds him as inseparable, and the words My very Self name the nearest that love can reach.
Across Viśiṣṭādvaita, Śuddhādvaita, Bhakti, and the modern voicesRāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabha · Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara · Viśvanātha · Baladeva · Jñāneśvar · Sivananda · RamsukhdasIn Rāmānuja, Vedānta Deśika, and 8 others’ words
It is precisely because of this exclusive, fruitless devotion that the Lord declares the knower to be 'atmaiva me', My very Self, and stresses that this is his own settled judgment ('me matam'). The schools differ sharply on how literally to take 'My very Self', but they agree on the structure of the reasoning: the knower has made the Lord his all, depends on nothing but the Lord, and therefore the Lord, in turn, holds him as inseparable from himself. The identity-language is the verse's way of naming the highest closeness love can reach.
This is the shared ground; it can be carried as it is. Below is where they differ.
Where they differthe divergence
Advaita Vedānta, in their fuller words
These commentators take 'the knower is My very Self' in its full literal force as a statement of non-difference. The knower has the firm conviction that he is none other than the Blessed Lord Vasudeva himself, and the Lord confirms it: the knower is the very Self, no other than Me. What makes him exceedingly dear is exactly this absence of any seen difference and any remaining desire. Where the desire-driven devotees still see the Lord as other and want things from him, the knower sees the Lord as his own Self and wants nothing else; so the Lord regards him not merely as dear but as identical, his settled view rather than a figure of speech.
Viśiṣṭādvaita, in their fuller words
Here 'My very Self' is read literally but within the frame in which the individual self has the Lord as its inner self and support. The knower is the Lord's very self because the holding-up, the very sustaining, of his self depends wholly on the Lord; he has realized and lived the truth that he cannot stand apart from the Lord for a moment, and so has resorted to the Lord alone as the unsurpassed thing to be attained. The relation is mutual and striking: just as the knower cannot subsist without the Lord, so the Lord says that without such a devotee the holding-up of his own self too is not possible. The knower has become the field on which the Lord's inner-ruler-hood rests steadily, and this is the rare fruit of refuge taken after knowing the truth of the self whose single savour is being subordinate to the Lord.
Bhedābheda, in their fuller words
This reading takes 'My very Self' without any figure of speech, plainly: the Lord holds the knower to be his very Self. The ground given is the second line of the verse itself, that the knower, his self disciplined, is established in the Lord alone as the unsurpassed goal beyond which no other is higher. The identity is affirmed directly rather than softened into mere dearness.
Dvaita, in their fuller words
This reading insists that 'My very Self' must not be taken as a declaration of the Lord's literal non-difference from the knowing devotee. If it were, three things would collapse: the knower could no longer be a worshipper distinct from the worshipped, the fourfold division of devotees would fail, and the scriptures that affirm difference even in liberation would be contradicted. So the identity-language is an idiom of exceeding dearness, just as one says 'Bhadrasena is my very self' of a beloved person. The Lord calls the knower his Self because, finding him desiring nothing but the Lord and unable to live a moment without him, he in turn cannot remain a moment without such a devotee. (This source notes jayatirtha offers no comment here.) Some take 'self' in this verse to mean simply the mind.
Śuddhādvaita, in their fuller words
On this reading the three other devotees are not outside the Lord at all, yet the knower alone is named 'My self' because in him alone the very bond is placed upon the Lord as his own self: the conscious 'cit' portion in him has been brought to the very form of the Supreme Person ('purushottama'). He thinks 'all is mine, I am his', and so fixes on the Lord as the unsurpassed goal. He is virtually liberated already, of the Lord's very substance, joined to the Lord in the disposition of servanthood; the wide 'pushti' (grace) frame grants nobility to the other three while reserving this nearness for the knower.
Bhakti, in their fuller words
These devotional commentators take 'My very Self' in its full force, but read it as the language of non-separation in love rather than abstract merger. One is emphatic that the knower is recognized as non-different from the Lover, not loved from afar. Another stresses that the goal attained is the Lord in his dark and beautiful personal form as the highest of all goals, expressly not extinction in an impersonal Brahman; and this commentator adds a further ranking from the Bhagavata, that the devotee of pure undivided love is held by the Lord as even dearer than his own self. A third offers the image of the calf that needs no rope to draw the cow's milk because it knows only 'this is my mother', and of rivers losing themselves on reaching the sea: such devotees, losing even their past self in knowing the Lord, are none other than the Lord himself, a truth called unutterable yet uttered.
A modern reading, in their fuller words
Among the modern voices, one explains the knower's identity through 'ahamgraha upasana', meditation on the Self as the all, in which he strives to realize that he is identical with the Supreme Self, and on that ground the Lord regards him as his very Self. The other, non-sectarian and devotional, reads the verse through 'prema-advaita', the non-duality of love: in love the lover offers himself wholly and no longer counts his own existence as separate, and the beloved does the same, so the two have the rare experience of being one while two and two while one. He distinguishes this from the non-duality of knowledge, which is forever still and uniform, whereas the non-duality of love is ever-growing; like a river entering the sea, the waters become one yet a living flow continues from both sides. On this reading 'My very Self' names a perpetual, inexpressible mutual belonging, not a flat merger.
A few questions to carry
These ask for understanding, not recall; each answer is settled by the commentary itself.
For a second sitting
Carry this with youwhat stays
If this verse seems to leave you behind because you still come to God with needs, look again at what is praised. The Gita's own promise is that God receives each person in the very way they approach him, and that the one who joins the bond first, from his own side, without waiting to see whether God responds, is already called noble. So begin from your side. Give yourself, and keep up your remembrance whether or not the thing you wanted arrives, because the steadiness of turning to God, not the granting of the wish, is what is being honored here. As that turning deepens it stops being about getting anything at all, and a different kind of nearness opens, the non-duality of love, in which you no longer count your own existence as separate from the one you love and he does the same toward you. Like a river meeting the sea, you become one, and yet a living flow continues between you forever. That, not a cold merger, is what 'the knower is My very Self' is pointing you toward, and the whole road there is held dear.
Begin from your own side: give yourself, and keep your remembrance steady whether or not the thing you wanted comes, for the turning toward God is held dear the whole way.
Read deeper
Everything a full study holds, folded below.
Word by word
All the commentary, woven together
The commentary, woven together
machine-assisted draft, pending review
Convergence
ll four kinds of devotee named just before this verse, the one in distress, the seeker of knowledge, the seeker of wealth, and the knower, are 'udara', which the commentators render as noble, large-souled, or generous. The verse exists partly to head off a wrong inference: when Krishna goes on to single out the knower as exceedingly dear, a reader might conclude the other three are unwelcome to him. He says no. All of them turn to him rather than to lesser deities, and that alone makes them worthy. Several commentators add a concrete reason for the praise: those who take anything at all from the Lord are in effect giving him their whole affection, and the Lord, who is fond of his devotees, counts that as a great gift in return.
Braided from 17 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrī Bhāskara · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar · Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas
No devotee of the Lord is undear to him; the difference is one of degree, not of rejection. The word 'tu' (but) and the qualifier 'exceedingly' mark a ranking, not an exclusion. Several commentators ground this in the Gita's own earlier promise that the Lord meets people in the very way they come to him: those who serve him for a particular fruit, he serves with that fruit, while the one who wants nothing but him receives the whole of his love. So the three desire-driven devotees are genuinely dear, but their dearness is mixed in with the things they want, whereas the knower, wanting nothing else, becomes the single undivided object of the Lord's love.
Braided from 7 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Swami Ramsukhdas · Sant Jñāneśvar
The knower's distinguishing mark is desirelessness aimed entirely at the Lord. He asks nothing from the Lord, neither worldly gain nor heaven nor even liberation as a separate prize, because he holds no fruit apart from the Lord to be a fruit at all. His mind is gathered and steady ('yuktatma'), settled on the Lord alone. This single-pointedness is what the second half of the verse states directly: he has taken his stand in the Lord as 'anuttama gati', the unsurpassed goal, the highest destination than which nothing stands higher, and that destination is the Lord himself.
Braided from 17 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrī Bhāskara · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar · Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas
It is precisely because of this exclusive, fruitless devotion that the Lord declares the knower to be 'atmaiva me', My very Self, and stresses that this is his own settled judgment ('me matam'). The schools differ sharply on how literally to take 'My very Self', but they agree on the structure of the reasoning: the knower has made the Lord his all, depends on nothing but the Lord, and therefore the Lord, in turn, holds him as inseparable from himself. The identity-language is the verse's way of naming the highest closeness love can reach.
Braided from 10 commentators
Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas
Divergence
Advaita Vedānta
These commentators take 'the knower is My very Self' in its full literal force as a statement of non-difference. The knower has the firm conviction that he is none other than the Blessed Lord Vasudeva himself, and the Lord confirms it: the knower is the very Self, no other than Me. What makes him exceedingly dear is exactly this absence of any seen difference and any remaining desire. Where the desire-driven devotees still see the Lord as other and want things from him, the knower sees the Lord as his own Self and wants nothing else; so the Lord regards him not merely as dear but as identical, his settled view rather than a figure of speech.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri
Viśiṣṭādvaita
Here 'My very Self' is read literally but within the frame in which the individual self has the Lord as its inner self and support. The knower is the Lord's very self because the holding-up, the very sustaining, of his self depends wholly on the Lord; he has realized and lived the truth that he cannot stand apart from the Lord for a moment, and so has resorted to the Lord alone as the unsurpassed thing to be attained. The relation is mutual and striking: just as the knower cannot subsist without the Lord, so the Lord says that without such a devotee the holding-up of his own self too is not possible. The knower has become the field on which the Lord's inner-ruler-hood rests steadily, and this is the rare fruit of refuge taken after knowing the truth of the self whose single savour is being subordinate to the Lord.
Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika
Bhedabheda
This reading takes 'My very Self' without any figure of speech, plainly: the Lord holds the knower to be his very Self. The ground given is the second line of the verse itself, that the knower, his self disciplined, is established in the Lord alone as the unsurpassed goal beyond which no other is higher. The identity is affirmed directly rather than softened into mere dearness.
Śrī Bhāskara
Dvaita
This reading insists that 'My very Self' must not be taken as a declaration of the Lord's literal non-difference from the knowing devotee. If it were, three things would collapse: the knower could no longer be a worshipper distinct from the worshipped, the fourfold division of devotees would fail, and the scriptures that affirm difference even in liberation would be contradicted. So the identity-language is an idiom of exceeding dearness, just as one says 'Bhadrasena is my very self' of a beloved person. The Lord calls the knower his Self because, finding him desiring nothing but the Lord and unable to live a moment without him, he in turn cannot remain a moment without such a devotee. (This source notes jayatirtha offers no comment here.) Some take 'self' in this verse to mean simply the mind.
Śrīla Baladeva
Śuddhādvaita
On this reading the three other devotees are not outside the Lord at all, yet the knower alone is named 'My self' because in him alone the very bond is placed upon the Lord as his own self: the conscious 'cit' portion in him has been brought to the very form of the Supreme Person ('purushottama'). He thinks 'all is mine, I am his', and so fixes on the Lord as the unsurpassed goal. He is virtually liberated already, of the Lord's very substance, joined to the Lord in the disposition of servanthood; the wide 'pushti' (grace) frame grants nobility to the other three while reserving this nearness for the knower.
Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama
Bhakti
These devotional commentators take 'My very Self' in its full force, but read it as the language of non-separation in love rather than abstract merger. One is emphatic that the knower is recognized as non-different from the Lover, not loved from afar. Another stresses that the goal attained is the Lord in his dark and beautiful personal form as the highest of all goals, expressly not extinction in an impersonal Brahman; and this commentator adds a further ranking from the Bhagavata, that the devotee of pure undivided love is held by the Lord as even dearer than his own self. A third offers the image of the calf that needs no rope to draw the cow's milk because it knows only 'this is my mother', and of rivers losing themselves on reaching the sea: such devotees, losing even their past self in knowing the Lord, are none other than the Lord himself, a truth called unutterable yet uttered.
Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Sant Jñāneśvar
Modern
Among the modern voices, one explains the knower's identity through 'ahamgraha upasana', meditation on the Self as the all, in which he strives to realize that he is identical with the Supreme Self, and on that ground the Lord regards him as his very Self. The other, non-sectarian and devotional, reads the verse through 'prema-advaita', the non-duality of love: in love the lover offers himself wholly and no longer counts his own existence as separate, and the beloved does the same, so the two have the rare experience of being one while two and two while one. He distinguishes this from the non-duality of knowledge, which is forever still and uniform, whereas the non-duality of love is ever-growing; like a river entering the sea, the waters become one yet a living flow continues from both sides. On this reading 'My very Self' names a perpetual, inexpressible mutual belonging, not a flat merger.
Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas
A Seeker Asks
If God calls all four devotees noble and dear, why does the knower still rank highest, and does that leave behind the person who turns to God out of need?
No one who turns to the Lord is left behind. The commentators are careful that the verse exists precisely to block the inference that the other three are unwelcome; the Lord opens by calling all of them noble, and several add that anyone who comes to the Lord at all, even asking for relief from distress, is counted as giving him much in return and is genuinely dear.
Braided from 6 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīla Baladeva · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Swami Ramsukhdas
The ranking is a difference of degree set by the Gita's own rule that the Lord meets each person in the manner they come to him. The three who come with a desire receive both their desired thing and the Lord, so their love is shared with what they want; the knower, wanting nothing else, becomes the single, undivided object of the Lord's love, and that is why he is called exceedingly dear.
Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śaṅkarācārya
So the verse is less a hierarchy that excludes than a description of where love is heading. The knower is named the Lord's very Self because he has made the Lord his sole goal and depends on nothing else; the seeker who comes in need is on the same road, simply earlier along it, and is held dear the whole way.
Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Swami Ramsukhdas · Śrīla Baladeva
Contemplation
If this verse seems to leave you behind because you still come to God with needs, look again at what is praised. The Gita's own promise is that God receives each person in the very way they approach him, and that the one who joins the bond first, from his own side, without waiting to see whether God responds, is already called noble. So begin from your side. Give yourself, and keep up your remembrance whether or not the thing you wanted arrives, because the steadiness of turning to God, not the granting of the wish, is what is being honored here. As that turning deepens it stops being about getting anything at all, and a different kind of nearness opens, the non-duality of love, in which you no longer count your own existence as separate from the one you love and he does the same toward you. Like a river meeting the sea, you become one, and yet a living flow continues between you forever. That, not a cold merger, is what 'the knower is My very Self' is pointing you toward, and the whole road there is held dear.
Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas
All the translations and commentary
Pull up a chair.
You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.