Those who live by this teaching, in faith and without finding fault, are freed from the bondage of works.
It is easy to take this as a small price, a little belief in exchange for so much. But what is asked is exacting in its own way: a settled trust in what you cannot yet see for yourself, and the refusal of the quiet grievance that your duties are a cruel burden laid on you by an unkind hand.
Those who constantly follow this teaching of mine, with faith and without finding fault, are freed from the bondage of action.
Having urged you to act as offering, without grasping at results, Krishna now names what such living yields, so you know what is at stake in accepting or refusing the teaching.
Where they agreethe convergence
Across schools and centuries the commentators come to the same ground. These are the points they share, and the voices that hold each one.
What Krishna offers here is not a passing opinion but his own settled judgment, handed down through scripture, and now he tells you plainly the fruit it bears for the one who lives by it.
Across Advaita, Dvaita, Bhakti, Śuddhādvaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Madhva · Jayatīrtha · Baladeva · Śrīdhara · Vallabha · Puruṣottama · Rāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika · RamsukhdasIn Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 10 others’ words
Krishna here states the fruit, the reward, of the teaching he has been giving. He has urged action done as offering, without grasping at results. Now he says what such action yields: those who live by this view are freed from karma, from the bondage of works. Several commentators note that this verse, with the two that follow, deliberately states the outcome so the seeker knows what is at stake in accepting or rejecting the teaching. The 'view' or 'settled judgment' (matam) is Krishna's own considered doctrine, handed down through scripture, not a passing opinion.
Two things are asked of you together: trust in what the teacher and the scripture declare, and the refusal of the resentful thought that you have been yoked to painful work by an unkind hand. Where either is missing, the gate stays shut.
Across Advaita, Bhakti, Śuddhādvaita, and the modern voicesŚaṅkara · Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana · Dhanapati · Nīlakaṇṭha · Śrīdhara · Baladeva · Puruṣottama · Sivananda · Ramsukhdas · Jñāneśvar · TilakIn Śaṅkara, Ānandagiri, and 10 others’ words
Two inner conditions must be met for this freedom, and the verse names both. The first is shraddha, faith: a settled trust that what the teacher and the scripture declare is true, even where the matter lies beyond what one can presently see or prove. The second is anasuya, the absence of fault-finding. To find fault is to impute a defect to what is in fact good. The specific fault the commentators have in view is the resentful thought that Krishna, the teacher, is unkind or cruel for yoking us to painful, toilsome action. To be free of asuya is to refuse that grievance against the teacher. Several commentators stress that both conditions are required together: where either faith or freedom from fault-finding is missing, the gate to liberation stays shut.
This door is open to anyone, of any order, stage, or tradition; it is not held back for a narrow class, and what it frees you from is the good and bad works that bind you to further birth.
Across Viśiṣṭādvaita, Advaita, and the modern voicesRāmānuja · Vedānta Deśika · Ramsukhdas · Śaṅkara · Madhusūdana · Nīlakaṇṭha · DhanapatiIn Rāmānuja, Vedānta Deśika, and 5 others’ words
This path is open to all who are qualified, not to a narrow class. The word manavah (men, human beings) is read broadly. One commentator says it picks out everyone qualified for the scripture that bears on the self, and warns against reading it narrowly. A modern commentator puts it most plainly: any human being of any varna (social order), ashrama (stage of life), dharma, or tradition may take up this teaching and be freed. The freedom itself is from karma described as merit and demerit, dharma and adharma, the good and bad works that bind a person to further birth and experience.
And notice the small word too: even those who only follow this path, and do not yet see directly, reach the same release, for the work itself, done in the Lord's spirit, becomes the way home.
Across Advaita, Bhakti, Śuddhādvaita, DvaitaMadhusūdana · Dhanapati · Ānandagiri · Śrīdhara · Śaṅkara · Vallabha · Puruṣottama · MadhvaIn Madhusūdana, Dhanapati, and 6 others’ words
How the freeing happens is spelled out by the Advaita commentators in particular: action offered to the Lord, without aiming at its fruit, purifies one's inner being, and that purity makes possible the rising of knowledge, and it is through that knowledge that one is finally released. So liberation here is gradual and mediated, not instant. Several note the force of the word 'too' (api) in 'they too are freed': those who merely practice this karma, like the direct knower, reach the same release, though by a slower road. The work itself, done in the Lord's spirit, becomes the path home.
This is the shared ground; it can be carried as it is. Below is where they differ.
Where they differthe divergence
Advaita Vedānta, in their fuller words
On this reading the freedom is gradual liberation reached by stages. Disinterested action offered to the Lord first purifies the inner being; that purity allows true knowledge of the self to arise; and it is knowledge, finally, that frees one from merit and demerit alike. The word 'too' is read to mark this as a secondary, slower route compared to the direct knower's. Faith is defined as trust in the unseen matter taught by scripture and teacher, and fault-finding (asuya) as the displaying of faults in what is virtuous, here the resentful charge that the teacher is unmerciful in setting one to painful action.
Viśiṣṭādvaita, in their fuller words
These commentators read the verse as naming three distinct grades of person, gathered together by the word 'too' (api). First, those who actually carry out this meaning of scripture as Krishna's settled judgment; second, those who do not yet carry it out but have faith in it; third, those who lack even faith but at least do not cavil, do not declare such a meaning impossible. All three are freed from beginningless bondage-causing action, because faith and freedom from caviling by themselves wear away sin, so that before long even the latter come to practice and are released. One of these commentators insists the praise is precisely that karma-yoga itself, directly, gives liberation; it is not jnana-yoga but this very practice that is the principal means.
Dvaita, in their fuller words
These commentators take the verse as a deliberate refutation of the doctrine that knowledge and action are to be combined as a joint means to liberation. The word 'too' is read not as conjunction but as 'how much more so': even those who merely do withdrawn, desireless action are released by way of knowledge, so how much more the one who has direct sight of the Lord. All such actions, obligatory and occasional alike, are means only because they aim at the direct sight of the Lord; that direct sight, seeking nothing further, is itself for release. Because action heard of directly as a means is thus itself only a mediated, subordinate aid, the idea that knowledge and action stand together as one combined means is set aside.
Śuddhādvaita, in their fuller words
Here the stress falls on action as the Lord's command, done in trust of his word. They too are freed either by the actions themselves or by release from the actions, obtaining mukti. One of these commentators frames the verse within a larger purpose: the teaching was given through Arjuna not for Arjuna's case alone but to set all good paths in motion for everyone who would act this way; for any such person no bondage born of works accrues. Works done as the Lord's command, in faith of his word and without envy, themselves become means of liberation.
Bhedābheda, in their fuller words
This commentator reads 3.31 only by pairing it immediately with its negative counterpart in the next verse. He turns at once to those who do not welcome this teaching, whose minds are confounded by the Sankhya and other systems: deluded in all knowledge and mindless, they are to be known as ruined. The accent here is the contrast, the downfall of the fault-finder, rather than a separate account of the freedom of the faithful.
Kashmir Śaiva, in their fuller words
This commentator reads 3.31 together with the following verse as a single contrast. Whoever, resting on this view, does whatever he does, that action does not bind him. By contrast, those who have no faith in this knowledge are lost, because their very being is pervaded without ceasing by the fear of birth, death, and the rest. Faith in the teaching is what dissolves that pervading fear and so unbinds action.
Bhakti, in their fuller words
These devotional commentators read the verse as praise meant to win the seeker's glad acceptance of the teaching. Faith is firm trust in Krishna's own word, and freedom from caviling is refusing the complaint that this is fruitless, toilsome action toward one who is in truth a deliverer. Those who do this view step by step are, like the full knower, released from karma. Some of them also offer the three-grades reading: those who practice, those who only have faith, and those who at least do not cavil, all freed, since faith and non-caviling let faults dwindle until one practices at last and is liberated. One calls the teaching an absolute rule of action, to be followed in full without scruple.
A modern reading, in their fuller words
The modern commentators draw out the two conditions for a present-day reader. Faith (shraddha) is described as a whole mental attitude, faith in one's own Self, in the scriptures, and in the teacher, compounded of reverence and humility. Freedom from fault-finding is treated as equally indispensable: one commentator states the condition is twofold, faith in the teaching and absence of fault-finding with teacher and teaching, and where either is missing the gate stays closed. He also universalizes the offer to any human being of any order, stage, or tradition, grounding it in the recognition that body, senses, mind, intellect, objects, and works are none of them truly one's own.
A few questions to carry
These ask for understanding, not recall; each answer is settled by the commentary itself.
For a second sitting
Carry this with youwhat stays
Notice that this verse asks two things of you, and they are simpler than they look. The first is faith: a willingness to trust the teaching even where you cannot yet see for yourself that it is true. The second is to stop finding fault, especially the quiet grievance that life's duties are a cruel burden laid on you by an unkind hand. Watch for that resentment when it rises; it is the very thing that keeps the gate shut. Underneath both lies one clear recognition that steadies everything: your body, your senses, your mind and intellect, the objects around you, even your works, are none of them finally your own. When you act from that recognition, with trust and without complaint, the same actions that once bound you begin to loosen their hold. The condition is met by anyone, of any background; what is required is not status but this twofold inner posture, faith and the refusal to find fault.
When you act in trust and without complaint, remembering that body and senses, mind and works are none of them finally your own, the same duties that once bound you begin to loosen their hold.
Read deeper
Everything a full study holds, folded below.
Word by word
All the commentary, woven together
The commentary, woven together
machine-assisted draft, pending review
Convergence
rishna here states the fruit, the reward, of the teaching he has been giving. He has urged action done as offering, without grasping at results. Now he says what such action yields: those who live by this view are freed from karma, from the bondage of works. Several commentators note that this verse, with the two that follow, deliberately states the outcome so the seeker knows what is at stake in accepting or rejecting the teaching. The 'view' or 'settled judgment' (matam) is Krishna's own considered doctrine, handed down through scripture, not a passing opinion.
Braided from 12 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha · Śrīla Baladeva · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Swami Ramsukhdas
Two inner conditions must be met for this freedom, and the verse names both. The first is shraddha, faith: a settled trust that what the teacher and the scripture declare is true, even where the matter lies beyond what one can presently see or prove. The second is anasuya, the absence of fault-finding. To find fault is to impute a defect to what is in fact good. The specific fault the commentators have in view is the resentful thought that Krishna, the teacher, is unkind or cruel for yoking us to painful, toilsome action. To be free of asuya is to refuse that grievance against the teacher. Several commentators stress that both conditions are required together: where either faith or freedom from fault-finding is missing, the gate to liberation stays shut.
Braided from 12 commentators
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Baladeva · Śrī Puruṣottama · Swami Sivananda · Swami Ramsukhdas · Sant Jñāneśvar · Lokmanya Tilak
This path is open to all who are qualified, not to a narrow class. The word manavah (men, human beings) is read broadly. One commentator says it picks out everyone qualified for the scripture that bears on the self, and warns against reading it narrowly. A modern commentator puts it most plainly: any human being of any varna (social order), ashrama (stage of life), dharma, or tradition may take up this teaching and be freed. The freedom itself is from karma described as merit and demerit, dharma and adharma, the good and bad works that bind a person to further birth and experience.
Braided from 7 commentators
Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika · Swami Ramsukhdas · Śaṅkarācārya · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Śrī Nīlakaṇṭha · Dhanapati Sūri
How the freeing happens is spelled out by the Advaita commentators in particular: action offered to the Lord, without aiming at its fruit, purifies one's inner being, and that purity makes possible the rising of knowledge, and it is through that knowledge that one is finally released. So liberation here is gradual and mediated, not instant. Several note the force of the word 'too' (api) in 'they too are freed': those who merely practice this karma, like the direct knower, reach the same release, though by a slower road. The work itself, done in the Lord's spirit, becomes the path home.
Braided from 8 commentators
Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrī Ānandagiri · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śaṅkarācārya · Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama · Madhvācārya
Divergence
Advaita Vedānta
On this reading the freedom is gradual liberation reached by stages. Disinterested action offered to the Lord first purifies the inner being; that purity allows true knowledge of the self to arise; and it is knowledge, finally, that frees one from merit and demerit alike. The word 'too' is read to mark this as a secondary, slower route compared to the direct knower's. Faith is defined as trust in the unseen matter taught by scripture and teacher, and fault-finding (asuya) as the displaying of faults in what is virtuous, here the resentful charge that the teacher is unmerciful in setting one to painful action.
Śaṅkarācārya · Śrī Ānandagiri · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri
Viśiṣṭādvaita
These commentators read the verse as naming three distinct grades of person, gathered together by the word 'too' (api). First, those who actually carry out this meaning of scripture as Krishna's settled judgment; second, those who do not yet carry it out but have faith in it; third, those who lack even faith but at least do not cavil, do not declare such a meaning impossible. All three are freed from beginningless bondage-causing action, because faith and freedom from caviling by themselves wear away sin, so that before long even the latter come to practice and are released. One of these commentators insists the praise is precisely that karma-yoga itself, directly, gives liberation; it is not jnana-yoga but this very practice that is the principal means.
Rāmānujācārya · Vedānta Deśika
Dvaita
These commentators take the verse as a deliberate refutation of the doctrine that knowledge and action are to be combined as a joint means to liberation. The word 'too' is read not as conjunction but as 'how much more so': even those who merely do withdrawn, desireless action are released by way of knowledge, so how much more the one who has direct sight of the Lord. All such actions, obligatory and occasional alike, are means only because they aim at the direct sight of the Lord; that direct sight, seeking nothing further, is itself for release. Because action heard of directly as a means is thus itself only a mediated, subordinate aid, the idea that knowledge and action stand together as one combined means is set aside.
Madhvācārya · Śrī Jayatīrtha
Śuddhādvaita
Here the stress falls on action as the Lord's command, done in trust of his word. They too are freed either by the actions themselves or by release from the actions, obtaining mukti. One of these commentators frames the verse within a larger purpose: the teaching was given through Arjuna not for Arjuna's case alone but to set all good paths in motion for everyone who would act this way; for any such person no bondage born of works accrues. Works done as the Lord's command, in faith of his word and without envy, themselves become means of liberation.
Vallabhācārya · Śrī Puruṣottama
Bhedabheda
This commentator reads 3.31 only by pairing it immediately with its negative counterpart in the next verse. He turns at once to those who do not welcome this teaching, whose minds are confounded by the Sankhya and other systems: deluded in all knowledge and mindless, they are to be known as ruined. The accent here is the contrast, the downfall of the fault-finder, rather than a separate account of the freedom of the faithful.
Śrī Bhāskara
Kashmir Shaivism
This commentator reads 3.31 together with the following verse as a single contrast. Whoever, resting on this view, does whatever he does, that action does not bind him. By contrast, those who have no faith in this knowledge are lost, because their very being is pervaded without ceasing by the fear of birth, death, and the rest. Faith in the teaching is what dissolves that pervading fear and so unbinds action.
Ācārya Abhinavagupta
Bhakti
These devotional commentators read the verse as praise meant to win the seeker's glad acceptance of the teaching. Faith is firm trust in Krishna's own word, and freedom from caviling is refusing the complaint that this is fruitless, toilsome action toward one who is in truth a deliverer. Those who do this view step by step are, like the full knower, released from karma. Some of them also offer the three-grades reading: those who practice, those who only have faith, and those who at least do not cavil, all freed, since faith and non-caviling let faults dwindle until one practices at last and is liberated. One calls the teaching an absolute rule of action, to be followed in full without scruple.
Śrīdhara Svāmī · Śrīla Viśvanātha · Śrīla Baladeva · Sant Jñāneśvar
Modern
The modern commentators draw out the two conditions for a present-day reader. Faith (shraddha) is described as a whole mental attitude, faith in one's own Self, in the scriptures, and in the teacher, compounded of reverence and humility. Freedom from fault-finding is treated as equally indispensable: one commentator states the condition is twofold, faith in the teaching and absence of fault-finding with teacher and teaching, and where either is missing the gate stays closed. He also universalizes the offer to any human being of any order, stage, or tradition, grounding it in the recognition that body, senses, mind, intellect, objects, and works are none of them truly one's own.
Swami Sivananda · Lokmanya Tilak · Swami Ramsukhdas
A Seeker Asks
If simply having faith and not finding fault can free a person, even before any real practice, does that not make liberation too cheap, a matter of mere assent rather than transformation?
The verse does not say faith replaces practice; it says faith and freedom from fault-finding are what make practice possible and effective. For most commentators the actual freeing still comes through action done as offering, which purifies the inner being so that knowledge can rise, and it is that knowledge that finally releases one. So the road is real and gradual, not a shortcut.
Madhusūdana Sarasvatī · Dhanapati Sūri · Śrī Ānandagiri · Śaṅkarācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī
The reason faith alone is praised so highly is that, for one who does not yet practice, faith and non-caviling already begin wearing away the sin and faults that block the way; such a person, with faults dwindling, comes before long to practice the teaching and is then liberated. Faith is thus the seed of transformation, not a substitute for it.
Rāmānujācārya · Śrīla Baladeva
What is being ruled out is not seriousness but its opposite: the resentful, fault-finding stance that closes the heart against the teacher and the teaching. Where either genuine faith or freedom from fault-finding is absent, the gate stays shut. So the requirement is exacting in its own way; it asks for a real change of inner posture, the refusal of grievance and the giving of trust, which is precisely where transformation starts.
Swami Ramsukhdas · Swami Sivananda
Contemplation
Notice that this verse asks two things of you, and they are simpler than they look. The first is faith: a willingness to trust the teaching even where you cannot yet see for yourself that it is true. The second is to stop finding fault, especially the quiet grievance that life's duties are a cruel burden laid on you by an unkind hand. Watch for that resentment when it rises; it is the very thing that keeps the gate shut. Underneath both lies one clear recognition that steadies everything: your body, your senses, your mind and intellect, the objects around you, even your works, are none of them finally your own. When you act from that recognition, with trust and without complaint, the same actions that once bound you begin to loosen their hold. The condition is met by anyone, of any background; what is required is not status but this twofold inner posture, faith and the refusal to find fault.
Sit with this · Swami Ramsukhdas
All the translations and commentary
Pull up a chair.
You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, tap a name in The seating.