StudyVedanta
Skip to the verse
V.215.115.3

Chapter 15 · 20 verses

Read slowly

The tree of birth and death roots itself, again and again, in exactly this human life.

Its branches spread everywhere, from the lowest forms to the highest worlds, fed by the very strands of your own nature. But it is here, in this life, that its roots actually take hold, and here, the commentators agree, that they can also be let go.

2Chapter 15
The verseSpoken by Krishna
Voices6 commentators · 5 schools · modern voices
The readingAbout 5 minutes, unhurried
अधश्चोर्ध्वं प्रसृतास्तस्य शाखा गुणप्रवृद्धा विषयप्रवालाः।अधश्च मूलान्यनुसन्ततानि कर्मानुबन्धीनि मनुष्यलोके
adhaśh chordhvaṁ prasṛitās tasya śhākhā guṇa-pravṛiddhā viṣhaya-pravālāḥ adhaśh cha mūlāny anusantatāni karmānubandhīni manuṣhya-loke

That tree's branches, thickened by the three strands of nature, reach downward and upward, with the objects of the senses as their tender shoots. And below, in the human world, its roots stretch on, binding one to action.

Bhagavad Gita 15.2
0:00 / 0:00

Saved for this reading session

Three movements · tap a label to switch

Sanskrit recitation by Swami Brahmānanda

Audio from the Gītā Supersite, IIT Kanpur

The reading read whole, as one unhurried piece

Where it stands

Krishna has just named the tree of samsara and its one supreme root, unseen and beyond this world. Now he turns to what you can actually see: the branches spreading in every direction, the tender shoots at their tips, and the roots that quietly re-form, right here, in the human world.

The teaching

One tree, branching everywhere, rooted again and again in exactly this life.

Follow the branches first. They run downward into the lower births, human, animal, down to the things that do not even move, and upward into the higher births, the gods and, at the summit, the world-maker Brahma. Every kind of existence there is hangs somewhere on this one tree. What swells these branches is the three gunas, sattva, rajas, and tamas, the very strands your own nature is woven from. They work like water poured at a root: wherever you are in contact with them, the tree keeps spreading, lush and thick. And at the tip of every branch, fresh shoots keep budding out, the objects of the senses, sound, touch, color, taste, and smell, tender and attractive the way new growth always is, and it is exactly there that attachment first closes its hand. The supreme root above was already named. But this tree drops a second kind of root too, downward, into the human world, and this is where the commentators sharply part ways. Some call these roots the impressions left in you by past enjoyment, attachment and aversion arising only after the deed and quietly driving the next one. Ramanuja calls them the deeds themselves, with nothing separate standing behind them. Madhva calls them, more surprisingly, forms of the Lord, since only the Lord truly allots what any deed will yield. Sridhara insists that only the Lord is the tree's true root at all, and that everything else is a lesser, borrowed longing. What all of them agree on is where this second rooting happens: in the human world, and nowhere else, because only the human birth carries the standing to set fresh action moving. Every other birth, beast or god, only lives out fruit already earned.

The doubt that rises

If the whole tree, root and branch, is the very shape of bondage, why does this verse single out the human world, the place where you feel most able to choose and to act, as exactly where its binding roots run deepest?

Where the paths divide

Advaita Vedanta

Read as a tree mapped precisely enough to be felled.

Shankara reads the branches as the bodies and conditions each being earns through its own past deeds and learning. The secondary roots are the leanings of desire and aversion that arise only after action and, in turn, drive fresh merit and demerit; he calls them 'action-following' for exactly this reason. Nothing here is decorative. A tree charted this exactly, branch, shoot, and root, is a tree that can, later, actually be cut down.

Vishishtadvaita

Read as one seamless map of the cosmic field.

Ramanuja roots the whole tree in the world of Brahma and tips it at the human being, one continuous field with no gaps in its account. For him the downward roots are simply the karmas, the deeds themselves, performed while a being is human; there is no separate residue apart from the act. By those very deeds come the lower births, and by those same deeds come the higher ones too.

Dvaita

Read against a rival account, explicitly rejected.

Madhva declines the reading of the roots as impressions of desire, calling it a break in the passage's own logic. The roots, for him, are the forms of the Lord and of nature, with the gunas as a lower root beneath Him. The Lord is called 'connected with action' only because He allots each being's fruit exactly according to its own deeds, never because He is bound the way the being is.

Kashmir Shaivism

Read honestly, from a fragment too thin for more.

What survives under Abhinavagupta's name here is brief: a restatement of the verse's own claims, and one further clause naming the tree's branches as the manifold play of universal consciousness. That much is real and worth holding. A fuller Shaiva reading of the gunas as consciousness's own contracting powers, and the down-roots as the mechanism of self-forgetting, would be a plausible extension, but it is flagged here as extrapolation, not reported as his own words.

Bhakti

Read with the Lord named as the one true root.

Sridhara is unambiguous: the Lord alone is this tree's principal root; every other so-called root is lesser, a buried longing for some enjoyment not yet spent. Only in the human world does the right to act exist at all, which is why a self arriving there, still carrying longings from other births, falls again into action that fits what it still craves.

Modern

Read as a precise diagram of where bondage actually forms.

Madhusudana marks the human birth as the tree's own midpoint: below it, the descent to the beasts; above it, the ascent to the world of Truth. The secondary roots are impressions of attachment and aversion, roots only in a qualified sense, since Brahman alone remains the tree's one unqualified root beneath everything else.

All six readings agree the human world is where this tree roots itself anew. They part on what, exactly, is doing the rooting: your own past impressions, your own present deeds, the Lord's forms working through you, or, on the thinnest surviving evidence, consciousness's own play forgetting itself. This page does not choose between them, and neither, plainly, does the verse.

A question to carry

What are you, right now, letting take root in you, and would you still let it, if you pictured it as one more shoot on this same tree?

So look, today, at what buds at the tip of your attention, and at what you are still quietly leaning on from before. Both are named in this one verse, and both, every reading here agrees, can be released in this very life, the only life where they took hold.

Each school is voiced from the commentators named above. Their full words, every translation, and where the schools agree and differ wait in the reading desk just below. Open the commentary desk.

Having named the tree and its one supreme root in 15.1, Krishna now traces its branches, its shoots, and the secondary roots that run down into the world where Arjuna, and every listener, actually stands.

Where they agreethe convergence

One tree, branching down into the lower births and up into the higher ones, fed by the gunas, budding into the objects of sense, and rooted downward, specifically and only, in the human world, through action.

Across schools and centuries the commentators come to the same ground. These are the points they share, and the voices that hold each one.

4schools

The branches of this one tree reach both ways: down into the lower births, up into the higher ones, the whole span of possible existence as the limbs of a single tree.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Dvaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja · Madhva · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and 3 others’ words

This verse continues the picture of the cosmic tree of samsara opened in 15.1. Its branches spread in two directions at once, downward into the lower births, human, animal, and on down to the unmoving things, and upward into the higher births, the gods and, at the summit, the world-maker Brahma. The whole span of possible existence is laid out as the limbs of a single tree.

Asked in question 1, below
2schools

The three strands of your own nature are what make these branches grow thick, the way water at the root swells a tree's limbs; wherever that contact holds, the tree keeps spreading.

Across Advaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Śrīdhara, and 1 others’ words

The three gunas, sattva, rajas, and tamas, are what swell and thicken these branches, exactly as water sprinkled at a tree's root makes its limbs grow lush. Wherever there is contact with the gunas, the tree of births keeps spreading; the gunas are named as the very nourishment of continued worldly existence.

Asked in question 2, below
3schools

The objects of the senses are the tender new shoots at the branch-tips, and it is exactly there, at those tips, that attachment first takes hold.

Across Advaita, Dvaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Madhva · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Madhva, and 2 others’ words

The sense-objects, sound and the rest, are read as the tender shoots at the tips of these branches, the fresh, attractive growth where attachment first takes hold. As new shoots keep appearing at a branch's end, so the objects of sense keep presenting themselves at the ends of the faculties, drawing the being further into the world.

Asked in question 3, below
3schools

Below the one supreme root, secondary roots stretch down into the human world, bound up with action, though the commentators read what these roots actually are in sharply different ways.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and 2 others’ words

Alongside the one supreme root already named, this tree drops secondary roots downward into the human world, and these are bound up with action. The commentators differ sharply on what these secondary roots actually are, but they agree that whatever runs downward here ties the being to karma, and that this rooting is said to happen specifically in the human world.

Asked in question 4, below
3schools

The human world is named for a reason: it alone carries the fitness for fresh action, so it is here, and only here, that the tree roots itself anew, and here, too, that the rooting can be stopped.

Across Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, BhaktiŚaṅkara · Rāmānuja · Śrīdhara · Madhusūdana
In Śaṅkara, Rāmānuja, and 2 others’ words

The human world is singled out because it alone carries the fitness to perform fresh action; every other birth, beast or god, only undergoes the fruit of deeds already done as a human being. This is why the verse names the human world by name, rather than leaving the roots' location unspecified.

This is the shared ground; it can be carried as it is. Below is where they differ.

Where they differthe divergence

The question they answer differently
What runs downward into the human world as the tree's secondary roots: the impressions left by past action, the actions themselves, or the very forms of the Lord?
The traditional commentators
Advaita Vedāntasee this school across the GītāŚaṅkara
The downward roots are the inner leanings of desire and aversion, born after the fact from the fruit of past deeds, and in turn driving fresh merit and demerit; the exact mapping exists to prepare the tree for felling.
Read as the anatomy of the transmigration-tree, charted so it can later be cut down.
Viśiṣṭādvaitasee this school across the GītāRāmānuja
The downward roots are simply the karmas themselves, the actions a person performs while human, which alone give rise to both the lower and the higher births.
Read as one unbroken map of the cosmic field, rooted in Brahma's world and tipped at the human being.
Viśiṣṭādvaita, in their fuller words

Ramanuja reads the whole tree as rooted in the world of Brahma and tipped at the human being, a single continuous map of the cosmic field. For him the downward roots are simply the karmas themselves, the very actions a person performs while human, which give rise to both the lower births, man and beast, and the higher births, the gods, with no separate class of impression apart from the deed.

Rāmānuja
Asked in question 6, below
Dvaitasee this school across the GītāMadhva
The roots are not impressions of attachment and aversion at all; they are the forms of the Lord and of nature, with the gunas beneath Him as a lower root, since only He truly allots the fruit of every deed.
Read against a rival account rejected as breaking the passage's own sequence.
Dvaita, in their fuller words

Madhva rejects the reading of the roots as attachment and aversion outright, calling it a break in the passage's own sequence. For him the roots are the forms of the Lord and of nature, with the gunas as a lower root beneath Him; the Lord is called 'connected with action' only in the sense that He allots the fruit exactly according to each being's own deeds, a scriptural citation from the Bhallaveya branch confirming the tree's fuller, Lord-grounded anatomy.

Madhva
Shaivasee this school across the GītāAbhinavagupta
The one surviving clause names the tree's branches as the manifold play of universal consciousness; the source is too thin to say more about the roots without flagging it as extrapolation.
Honest limit: only a fragment of this reading survives.
Shaiva, in their fuller words

The extant fragment attributed to Abhinavagupta is thin, largely a restatement of the verse's own terms, but it adds one notable clause: the cosmic tree's branches are named as the manifold play of universal consciousness. This is offered here only as far as the fragment supports; a fuller Kashmir Shaiva reading of the gunas and the roots in this same idiom would be a flagged extrapolation, not a report of Abhinavagupta's own words.

Abhinavagupta
BhaktiŚrīdhara
The Lord alone is the tree's one principal root; every other root is a lesser, borrowed thing, a buried longing for enjoyment not yet spent, which drives the self back into fitting action once it reaches human birth.
Read with the Lord named explicitly as the tree's sole true root.
Bhakti, in their fuller words

Sridhara names the Lord alone as the tree's one principal root, with every other so-called root merely a lesser one, a buried longing for enjoyment not yet spent. Only in the human world does the right to act exist, he says, which is exactly why a self that arrives there carrying leftover longings from other births falls again into action fitted to what it still craves.

Śrīdhara
Modern voices teachers of the last two centuries, read together; they stand apart from the classical schools
A modern readingMadhusūdana
The verse traces the tree with careful precision, above and below the human midpoint, and names the secondary roots as impressions of attachment and aversion, roots only in a qualified sense, since Brahman remains the one true root beneath everything.
Read as a precise, almost diagrammatic charting of where bondage actually forms.
A modern reading, in their fuller words

Madhusudana lays out the tree with unusual precision of direction: below, from the human downward, and above, from the human upward to the world of Truth, with the secondary roots as impressions of attachment and aversion that set dharma and adharma in motion, roots in name only since the one true root remains Brahman. He is explicit that this rooting happens above all in the human world, for it is human beings, before all others, who are fit for action.

Madhusūdana
Sit with these

A few questions to carry

These ask for understanding, not recall; each answer is settled by the commentary itself.

1
In which two directions does the verse say the tree's branches spread?
2
What is said to make the tree's branches grow thick and lush?
3
What does the verse name as the tender shoots of this tree?
4
Where does the verse say the tree's secondary, action-bound roots run down into?
5
Why is the human world singled out as where the binding roots run deepest?
6
For Ramanuja, what exactly are the downward roots?
For a second sitting6 more questions
7
What does Madhva reject about the roots, and what does he put in its place?
8
How complete is the surviving record of Abhinavagupta's reading of this verse?
9
According to Sridhara, which root is the tree's true, principal root?
10
What precision does Madhusudana add to the direction of the branches?
11
What single root did the previous verse, 15.1, already name as supreme?
12
If new karma can only take root in human birth, what hopeful implication follows for the same reason?

Carry this with youwhat stays

Notice today where your own attention keeps budding: what sound, sight, or thought does your mind reach toward the way a branch reaches toward light? That reaching is the tender shoot the verse names, and it is not hard to break off once you see it clearly. Then notice what you did yesterday that you are still leaning on, still hoping will bear a certain fruit. That leaning is the root the verse says runs down into exactly this human life, the one life, the commentators agree, in which it can also be undone.

So watch, today, where your own attention buds, and notice what you are still leaning on from yesterday; both are named here, and both, in this very life, can be released.

अधश्चोर्ध्वं प्रसृतास्तस्य शाखा गुणप्रवृद्धा विषयप्रवालाः।adhaśh chordhvaṁ prasṛitās tasya śhākhā guṇa-pravṛiddhā viṣhaya-pravālāḥ

Read deeper

Everything a full study holds, folded below.

Word by word17 terms
adhaḥdownwardchaandūrdhvamupwardprasṛitāḥextendedtasyaitsśhākhāḥbranchesguṇamodes of material naturepravṛiddhāḥnourishedviṣhayaobjects of the sensespravālāḥbudsadhaḥdownwardchaandmūlānirootsanusantatānikeep growingkarmaactionsanubandhīniboundmanuṣhya-lokein the world of humans
All the commentary, woven togetherevery voice, in one place

The commentary, woven together

machine-assisted draft, pending review

Convergence

his verse continues the picture of the cosmic tree of samsara opened in 15.1. Its branches spread in two directions at once, downward into the lower births, human, animal, and on down to the unmoving things, and upward into the higher births, the gods and, at the summit, the world-maker Brahma. The whole span of possible existence is laid out as the limbs of a single tree.

Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Madhvācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

The three gunas, sattva, rajas, and tamas, are what swell and thicken these branches, exactly as water sprinkled at a tree's root makes its limbs grow lush. Wherever there is contact with the gunas, the tree of births keeps spreading; the gunas are named as the very nourishment of continued worldly existence.

Śaṅkarācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

The sense-objects, sound and the rest, are read as the tender shoots at the tips of these branches, the fresh, attractive growth where attachment first takes hold. As new shoots keep appearing at a branch's end, so the objects of sense keep presenting themselves at the ends of the faculties, drawing the being further into the world.

Śaṅkarācārya · Madhvācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Alongside the one supreme root already named, this tree drops secondary roots downward into the human world, and these are bound up with action. The commentators differ sharply on what these secondary roots actually are, but they agree that whatever runs downward here ties the being to karma, and that this rooting is said to happen specifically in the human world.

Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

The human world is singled out because it alone carries the fitness to perform fresh action; every other birth, beast or god, only undergoes the fruit of deeds already done as a human being. This is why the verse names the human world by name, rather than leaving the roots' location unspecified.

Śaṅkarācārya · Rāmānujācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

Divergence

Advaita Vedānta

Shankara reads the branches as the bodies and conditions each being earns by its own deeds and learning, and the secondary roots as the inner leanings of desire and aversion born from the fruit of past action, called 'action-following' because they arise only after the deed and in turn drive fresh merit and demerit. The entire, exact mapping serves one purpose: a tree this precisely charted is a tree that can, in time, be felled.

Śaṅkarācārya

Viśiṣṭādvaita

Ramanuja reads the whole tree as rooted in the world of Brahma and tipped at the human being, a single continuous map of the cosmic field. For him the downward roots are simply the karmas themselves, the very actions a person performs while human, which give rise to both the lower births, man and beast, and the higher births, the gods, with no separate class of impression apart from the deed.

Rāmānujācārya

Dvaita

Madhva rejects the reading of the roots as attachment and aversion outright, calling it a break in the passage's own sequence. For him the roots are the forms of the Lord and of nature, with the gunas as a lower root beneath Him; the Lord is called 'connected with action' only in the sense that He allots the fruit exactly according to each being's own deeds, a scriptural citation from the Bhallaveya branch confirming the tree's fuller, Lord-grounded anatomy.

Madhvācārya

Kashmir Śaiva

The extant fragment attributed to Abhinavagupta is thin, largely a restatement of the verse's own terms, but it adds one notable clause: the cosmic tree's branches are named as the manifold play of universal consciousness. This is offered here only as far as the fragment supports; a fuller Kashmir Shaiva reading of the gunas and the roots in this same idiom would be a flagged extrapolation, not a report of Abhinavagupta's own words.

Ācārya Abhinavagupta

Bhakti

Sridhara names the Lord alone as the tree's one principal root, with every other so-called root merely a lesser one, a buried longing for enjoyment not yet spent. Only in the human world does the right to act exist, he says, which is exactly why a self that arrives there carrying leftover longings from other births falls again into action fitted to what it still craves.

Śrīdhara Svāmī

Modern

Madhusudana lays out the tree with unusual precision of direction: below, from the human downward, and above, from the human upward to the world of Truth, with the secondary roots as impressions of attachment and aversion that set dharma and adharma in motion, roots in name only since the one true root remains Brahman. He is explicit that this rooting happens above all in the human world, for it is human beings, before all others, who are fit for action.

Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

A Seeker Asks

If the whole tree of births is the trap, why does this verse single out the human world, the place where I feel most alive and able to act, as where the binding roots run deepest?

Because the human world is the one birth with the standing to perform fresh action at all. Every other birth, animal, plant, or the exalted worlds of the gods, only undergoes the fruit of deeds already done in some earlier human life. Only here can new karma actually be set in motion, which is exactly why the verse locates the action-bound roots here and nowhere else.

Śaṅkarācārya · Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhusūdana Sarasvatī

The same capacity that makes human life feel most vivid, the freedom to choose and to act, is the very capacity that ties the knot tighter. Ramanuja is direct that it is the deeds themselves, not some separate residue, that root the tree downward here; the vividness and the vulnerability are one and the same fact.

Rāmānujācārya

But this same singling-out carries a hopeful edge. Sridhara holds that the Lord alone is the tree's true root, so what runs down into human life are only leftover longings, not anything final; and if action can only take fresh root here, then here is also the only place any of these commentators locate the power to stop, to let the fresh rooting cease.

Śrīdhara Svāmī · Madhvācārya

Contemplation

Notice today where your own attention keeps budding: what sound, sight, or thought does your mind reach toward the way a branch reaches toward light? That reaching is the tender shoot the verse names, and it is not hard to break off once you see it clearly. Then notice what you did yesterday that you are still leaning on, still hoping will bear a certain fruit. That leaning is the root the verse says runs down into exactly this human life, the one life, the commentators agree, in which it can also be undone.

Sit with this · sonnet-5-authored

All the translations and commentary7 translations
Translationsthe verse re-voiced; tap a translator
The commentatorsthe schools expound the verse

Pull up a chair.

You have come to sit with this verse. When you are ready to hear the translators and the commentators in full, open a tradition in the doorways below, or add a voice by name above.

Also hear this verse, tradition by tradition.

Where this teaching echoesin the Haripath